Imperial Eukaryotes
Friday fun link: watch four maritime empires grow and decline.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I think they forgot Ireland.
India should've been a much larger bubble than either Canada or Australia.
Only if they did it by population. By land area ...
I was more thinking of economic benefit to the empire. Of course, I'm probably wrong - don't know how much Australia or Canada contributed to the British economy back in the first half of the 20th century.
not much seeing as Canada became independent in 1867 although Canada did provide over 60,000 dead bodies by 1918, was that for england... or france I always get that confused?
One of the points Lord Durham made in his report in 1837 was that governing Canada cost the British Treasury about 20 times what the revenues were.
Granting self-government was his second recommendation.
His first was to turn Canada over to the US.
lucky for you guys you didn't get us, You did manage to get stuck with Alaska though I heard a very wise American once say that you can see Russia from there
y - a - d
I live in Victoria.
ah, not still lamenting being dumped by the British and getting stuck with us redneck hayseed are you?
yea well it only cost the Canadian treasury 10 times what it brings in in revenues....
I should be glad the Americans were too smart to take us.
Otherwise, I would have been wading through rice paddies in the Mekong Delta ca. 1970.
Did I miss Mexico's pustule burst off?
Mexico splits off around 1821 as "Mexican Empire."
Why do South Africa and Canada split off around 1930?
Canada and South Africa were technically self-governing colonies until the Statute of Westminister in 1931.
Is my computer messed or was there just no sound? I would enjoyed hearing bubbles burst or some similar noise; the bigger the bubble the louder the burst.
Is my computer messed
Check its diaper.
But be sure to click the "HD." Four colored circles look fuckin' awesome like that!
I watched the video through an RDP connection, why did they start at 1800? I'd have been curious to see how large (or small) a bubble the U.S. would have been off Britain.
They also left off the Louisiana Purchase.
Haiti, too!
It would we interesting if they also included the US, Russia/Soviet Union/Russia, China and Japan as well.
I'm still not clear what the schematic represents, I think it is land area, but, if so, they should have included Prussia/Germany, the Netherlands and Italy.
Germany would have been fun - a rapid expansion (assuming we're doing something like land area rather than population or revenue) and then an abrupt and complete deflation.
Twice.
The second empire wasn't a maritime empire.(The first empire had shit-tons of Africa colonies.)
Would you have wanted to cross the North Atlantic by ship in May of 1942?
Missing the dutch empire. and I had no idea the french overseas territories were more numerous than the other people. Poor Spain though, their laziness really fucked them over.
Spain was not lazy. It was the fact that Spain's empire was purely extractive rather than mercantile.
Unlike the British aristocracy, the Spanish aristocracy refused to engage in commerce.
I think the portuguese had a saying that went roughly
The British after praying to their God slaughtered the natives.
The Portuguese after a slight nod to their God slept with them.
This appears to me to be more an illustration of de-colonization rather than growth and decline of empire. I did not detect the inflation of an empire's strength due to relative increase in national capabilities, nor the effects of wars (Franco-Prussian War, 1871, e.g.) on the balance of power between these four empires.
Does the "British" blob remind anyone else of Mr. Creosote?
Wouldn't the U.S. blob have pretty much filled the screen at about 1990?
Yep. Someone once told me that there are 5 truly sovereign countries. United States, China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran.
Around 1921 Britain grows a hemmorhoid named Egypt. That thing still needs a big glob of Prep H.
nice find
Very cool.