Lights Out

Felix Gonzalez-Torres, who died of AIDS in 1996, intended the warm incandescent bulbs in his 1993 installation Untitled (Strange Music) to burn out and be replaced, part of a cycle of expiration and renewal. To substitute long-lasting, environmentally friendly compact fluorescent bulbs would change the piece beyond recognition. But that's just what the European Union expects gallery owners, curators, and contemporary artists to do.
European Parliament Directive 2005/32/EG banned the sale and importation of 100-watt incandescent bulbs starting September 1, with lower wattages phasing out over time. There is no exception for artists or museums, and getting caught selling wasteful old-style bulbs brings a whopping $70,000 fine.
Sales of incandescent bulbs were up 150 percent in the E.U. in August, but hoarding isn't a viable option to protect the bulb-intensive works of Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, Olafur Eliasson, Carsten Höller, Jorge Pardo, and the many others joining Gonzalez-Torres on the endangered list.
The E.U. has stood by the total ban, with spokesman Ferran Tarradellas boldly overstating his case in ArtForum: "It's utterly ludicrous to ask the commission for the sake of art to leave a product on the market that could be dangerous for the environment, health, and the consumer. Otherwise exceptions could be asked for when an artist wants to use antiperson [sic] landmines, enriched plutonium, or CFC."
Katherine Mangu-Ward (kmw@reason.com) is a senior editor at reason.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I'm sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won't get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there's more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp. I'm not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that! It's just that he, like many types of religionists, seems to take it literally, take it straight...the Bible's books were not written by straight laced divinity students in 3 piece suits who white wash religious beliefs as if God made them with clothes on...the Bible's books were written by people with very different mindsets..
My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I'm sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane.
..in order to really get the Books of the Bible, you have to cultivate such a mindset, it's literally a labyrinth, that's no joke
rsyery
fgjfgjfgjdf
thank you man thanx a lot's
is good
thank u man
That's cool!