Contributors
"Are Property Rights Enough?" (page 30) was born out of an online dust-up between Contributing Editor Kerry Howley and libertarian journalist Todd Seavey about the relationship between libertarianism and feminism, ignited by a disagreement over the individualist implications of the work of Simone de Beauvoir. "Libertarianism needn't be any one thing," says Howley, 27, a fellow at the University of Iowa's literary nonfiction program. "It's great to have dissension and disagreement. My definition will probably encompass more people who don't self-identify as libertarian, but maybe if people are willing to push the boundaries of what libertarianism is about, they will self-identify that way." Howley blogs at Slate's Double X, a site for women.
Todd Seavey, an editor at the American Council on Science and Health, is the self-proclaimed "last sane moderate on this planet." Seavey, 40, blogs at ToddSeavey.com (motto: "conservatism for punks") and hosts monthly debates at Lolita Bar in downtown Manhattan. "I like science, thus the day job—as well as fantasy, thus some writing for comic books," Seavey says. "And I think it's important to keep the distinction between facts and imaginary things in mind. People of the utopian left bent, as perhaps Kerry is, sometimes get carried away imagining how people ideally ought to live, just as Tories sometime over-romanticize a vision of the past."
Daniel McCarthy, 31, is a senior editor at The American Conservative and editorial director of Young American Revolution, a magazine published by Students for Ron Paul's successor group, Young Americans for Liberty. In his contribution to the property rights forum, he strives to put cultural libertarianism into historical context. "There are times and ways in which liberty can be more left-wing or more right-wing, at least relative to what else is happening," he says. "Relative, I guess, to the direction of authoritarianism." McCarthy lives in Arlington, Virginia.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I'm sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won't get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there's more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp. I'm not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that! It's just that he, like many types of religionists, seems to take it literally, take it straight...the Bible's books were not written by straight laced divinity students in 3 piece suits who white wash religious beliefs as if God made them with clothes on...the Bible's books were written by people with very different mindsets..
..in order to really get the Books of the Bible, you have to cultivate such a mindset, it's literally a labyrinth, that's no joke
My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I'm sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane.
We could just offer to buy all the
poppy farmers entire crop just to take it off the market. This would directly help the farmers, and solve the drug
problem in the Western Nations.
nwrt
asfasf
is good
thank u
G?nstige Hochzeitskleider und Abendkleid sind hier, was Sie wollen.