Politico has an article today that I think overstates the case that John McCain is taking a "burgeoning political role" in helping "reshape the Republican Party in his own center-right image." Sample:
[T]hose familiar with McCain's thinking say he has expressed serious concern about the direction of the party and is actively seeking out and supporting candidates who can broaden the party's reach.
In McCain's case, that means backing conservative pragmatists and moderates.
"I think he's endorsed people with center-right politics because he has an understanding that the party is in trouble with certain demographics and wants to have a tone that would allow us to grow," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican who is McCain's closest friend and ally in the Senate.
"At a time when our party is struggling and has a lot of shrill voices and aggressive voices, he's one that can expand our party," said John Weaver, a longtime McCain friend and strategist.
"John remains the titular head of the Republican Party and he will be until there's a new nominee," he said. "Most of the people that ran and lost you never heard from again," he said. "He's not going to be like Ed Muskie or Hubert Humphrey." […]
McCain told POLITICO in a brief interview that he was determined to play a major role in the GOP's rebuilding effort-beginning with the party's 2010 campaign.
"I think it's important, at this stage in my career, to try to support candidates that I think represent the next generation of leadership in the Republican Party," the 73-year-old McCain said[.]
McCain's got brand-recognition and some deep-pocketed donors, to be sure, but a front-row seat at the party-reshaping conference? There was only one person on the GOP ticket last year who excited the Republican base and keeps them buzzing to this day, and her name is not "John."
Judging from the article (which is probably a bad idea), the Nu McCainites will be distinguished by their non-shrillness, social inclusion, fiscal responsibility…and loyalty to John McCain. It's a potentially interesting mix, I suppose, but it seems to me the animating question among Republicans this season is what to do about government over-reach, especially on the economy. McCain's record on that is and remains decidedly mixed: He is anti-entitlement but pro-bailout, anti-redistributionist but pro-redestributionist, pro-limited government but anti-libertarian, anti-Waxman-Markey but pro-cap-and-trade, and so on.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
JB, we have Obama because we (me and a buncha other folks) were starry eyed hopeaholics that took to the bit like Pro Lib on a week long Annie Green Springs bender.
And not very well either, if you really believe McCain is at fault for Obama.
It's not the because of the last president, nor because of the republicans that voted for him in the primary. It was a result of one republican. Yeeaaahhhhhhhhh.
McCain is:
pro-Cap and Trade
pro-increasing taxes for health care reform
pro-dumping millions of dollars into the failing federal education system
pro-gun control
pro-pork barrel spending
pro-$800 billion bailout
pro-TARP
pro-increasing the deficit
Sigh, ignorance. Poor McCain, cutting everybody's taxes except for the very wealthiest, and confusing people because the plan was too complicated and he couldn't explain it. People don't even know the difference between a deduction and a credit.
This "taxing the richest only" is crap. A tax on the rich is a tax on all. As is a tax on the poor, or the middle class.
People don't earn a fixed income, they earn what they are worth more or less. So when the government taxes, it increases the burden of government on society, it doesn't make any job inherently earn less real wealth.
Ugh, the pale rider of the apocalypse returns. The republicans are as devoid of hope for finding real leaders as are the dems. Time for the Libertarians to do soemething, anything, please. There has to be a sane and tolerable prez candidate out there somewhere...
As evidence of the way things went downhill politically, in 2000 I was very glad Geo., Jr. got the prez nom instead of McCain, whom I'd greatly feared, but in 2008 I voted for McCain in the gen'l, and was glad he'd gotten the nomination rather than some other GOP threats to take it.
I don't like Huckabee, but he is not nearly as repugnant as the brain dead Edwards. My god, Edwards may be the worst presidential candidate ever. Huckabee is ok, he's just too far right religious kind of goofy.
Huckabee is ok, he's just too far right religious kind of goofy.
He's not even too far right. He's an old-school type of religious conservative Democrat that doesn't exist much anymore, who ran as a Republican and creates lots of crossover votes both way.
Because McCain's a "maverick" against ideological conservative Republicans, backing the milquetoast sellout will burnish McCain's credibility with the MSM.
I'll consider voting for John McCain when he demonstrates any understanding of the document he spent his entire adult life swearing to uphold. It ain't happened yet, but who knows? Pigs may indeed fly.
I'm gladder than ever to say I voted for McCain in 2008, bad as he was. There's no clearer way to put being anti-Obama. Voting for the LP nominee would be like saying McCain & Obama were equally bad, which is clearly not so.
It's all rather simple, leftist peoples. The Republicans aren't in power, and their crazed excesses are beginning to look restrained compared to what your guys are attempting to do.
I'm not worried about NuMcCain. I'm sure he'll be like the OldMcCain and get a bug up his ass at irregular intervals about stupid shit like athletes on steroids.
I like the guy in a lot of ways, I just wish he was sane.
Why on earth do dogmatic moonbat libertarians care what a heretic like McCain thinks or does?
Why do you think libertarians are moonbats?
Edward, kill yourself.
New meme! Hooray!
I figured Edward/Lefiti/Morris deserved one of it's own.
You figured right.
McCain's comeback will come right after Dole's. He has to wait his turn. Again.
Bob Dole is still alive?
Bob Dole is still alive
I liked the commercials that make you imagine him as a sexual being.
Oh, he's a tiger! Grrrowl!
Oh God. Retire already you old coot.
You are the reason we have the Obamination.
GOP: stop nominating people like McCain and Dole!
JB, we have Obama because we (me and a buncha other folks) were starry eyed hopeaholics that took to the bit like Pro Lib on a week long Annie Green Springs bender.
JB's totally gonna cuss at you now, dude.
At least your admit you were a douche. That's the first step.
Whoa, somebody that can barely be civil for 3 sentences calling someone else a douche?
In my world, yes someone who voted for the Obamination is worse than someone who swears.
Good thing we don't live in your world. I've read what you think of women.
Depends on the woman. I judge people as individuals and many of them come up lacking.
And not very well either, if you really believe McCain is at fault for Obama.
It's not the because of the last president, nor because of the republicans that voted for him in the primary. It was a result of one republican. Yeeaaahhhhhhhhh.
It was a lot of people's fault (mainly the people that voted for him), but McCain never should have ran and shouldn't have ran such an awful campaign.
Actualyy, McCain out-libertarianed the libertarians during the campaign. Even the patriotic libertarian (is he still around?) would have had qualms about having an advisor who was to an extent in effect an agent of a foreign government.
Shut the fuck up, LoneWacko.
Good to see that Reason's threading scheme makes it easier for libertarians to reveal their inner fascist.
Meanwhile, here's a question for the grown-ups: do any IsraeliLibertarians support OpenBorders?
Neat, new types of xenophobia and racism from LoneWacko. Or did I miss the Jew-baiting before?
Looks like John Thacker still has a problem with the truth.
Seconded.
O/T - I could get used to threaded comments.
McCain is:
pro-Cap and Trade
pro-increasing taxes for health care reform
pro-dumping millions of dollars into the failing federal education system
pro-gun control
pro-pork barrel spending
pro-$800 billion bailout
pro-TARP
pro-increasing the deficit
Yeah, way to go libertarian McCain...
He wrote CFR. He could run against Polanski and Zombie Kennedy and I'd stay home.
The only reason to vote McCain was to punch Obama zombies in the head.
I do that with my fists, not votes.
Sigh, ignorance. Poor McCain, cutting everybody's taxes except for the very wealthiest, and confusing people because the plan was too complicated and he couldn't explain it. People don't even know the difference between a deduction and a credit.
This "taxing the richest only" is crap. A tax on the rich is a tax on all. As is a tax on the poor, or the middle class.
People don't earn a fixed income, they earn what they are worth more or less. So when the government taxes, it increases the burden of government on society, it doesn't make any job inherently earn less real wealth.
Does Graham not realize that the Northeast has opted for real Democrats instead of fake Republicans?
Ugh, the pale rider of the apocalypse returns. The republicans are as devoid of hope for finding real leaders as are the dems. Time for the Libertarians to do soemething, anything, please. There has to be a sane and tolerable prez candidate out there somewhere...
Unfortunately, sane and tolerable people stay the hell out of politics.
This is true.
The House at least should be a lottery system with maybe a 4 year term and very good pay to discourage bribery.
Shut the fuck up, John McCain.
Moonbat Libertarians? Sorry, wrong spelling Morris, it is spelled 'moonbat liberals'. Glad I could clarify that for you.
Trying hard now,
It's so hard now,
Trying hard now.
Getting strong now,
Won't be long now,
Getting strong now.
Gonna fly now.
Flying high now.
Gonna fly, fly, fly. . . .
As evidence of the way things went downhill politically, in 2000 I was very glad Geo., Jr. got the prez nom instead of McCain, whom I'd greatly feared, but in 2008 I voted for McCain in the gen'l, and was glad he'd gotten the nomination rather than some other GOP threats to take it.
True. Just think of an Edwards/Huckabee general election. Ugh.
I don't like Huckabee, but he is not nearly as repugnant as the brain dead Edwards. My god, Edwards may be the worst presidential candidate ever. Huckabee is ok, he's just too far right religious kind of goofy.
he's just too far right religious kind of goofy
We have this year's winner!
He's a Democrat who got religion. Big government lover.
He's not even too far right. He's an old-school type of religious conservative Democrat that doesn't exist much anymore, who ran as a Republican and creates lots of crossover votes both way.
I said if there was some kind of combined Edwards/Huckabee ticket that would likely be enough to get me on the warpath.
McCain had an opportunity to distinguish himself from both Bush and Obama on TARP. Instead he came down on the side of "Me Too."
Not that I was leaning towards voting him prior to that. But that political decision basically made voting for Barr an easy decision.
I used to like McCain, despite all his negatives, but when he went to Lynchburg to pay homage to Fallwell he lost my respect and vote.
Maybe he wanted to get a dildo of his own from him.
I dunno, I liked him on Battlestar Galactica.
Awesome.
Yes, but instead we got President Baltar Obama.
(I can say that, right? It's not racist to compare Obama to a successful white actor, is it?)
no, you are a racist
Isn't McCain about 12 months too late for this? NOW he wants to be inclusive? What about sweet tits? And what about Joe the 'Merkin? Jeez.
Not sure how the "maverick" McCain burnishes his cred by backing the milquetoast establishment guy, Crist, in Florida, over Rubio.
No way I'm voting for Crist. Never have, never will [insert deep, Trinidadian laugh].
Because McCain's a "maverick" against ideological conservative Republicans, backing the milquetoast sellout will burnish McCain's credibility with the MSM.
I don't trust anyone who holds the useper nationalist zealot Teddy Roosevelt as his hero.
Don't you mean the anglo-saxon zeolot Teddy Roosevelt?
I'll consider voting for John McCain when he demonstrates any understanding of the document he spent his entire adult life swearing to uphold. It ain't happened yet, but who knows? Pigs may indeed fly.
Fuck John McCain.
Who gives a fuck about the GOP?
I thought this site was about liberty?
lol....i've been wondering about that lately. Every other post is either about Republicans getting a second wind, or a defense of them.
Do not want.
I will say just two words about my vote for McCain last year:
never again.
(I feel like I'm at an AA meeting: Hi, I'm filbert, and I voted for McCain.)
I started out my political life as a card-carrying member of the LP.
I'm headed back there unless the R's pull their heads out of their asses.
I'm gladder than ever to say I voted for McCain in 2008, bad as he was. There's no clearer way to put being anti-Obama. Voting for the LP nominee would be like saying McCain & Obama were equally bad, which is clearly not so.
I think it's too late for a comeback for Mccain.
http://next-world-war.blogspot.com
The really good news is that the new server hasn't crashed my browser the way the previous one used to do regularly.
At least Huckabee had balanced a budget, and succesfully run a state. IMO, we could have used a small amount of competenece in the white house.
Barbour/Huckabee in 2012!
(with Newt playing the part of Sec. of State)
God, I read that as Babar/Huckabee.
I don't know Barbour, but Huckabee is a nanny. Thanks to him, in Arkansas, you can't smoke in your car if kids are with you.
It's all rather simple, leftist peoples. The Republicans aren't in power, and their crazed excesses are beginning to look restrained compared to what your guys are attempting to do.
I'm not worried about NuMcCain. I'm sure he'll be like the OldMcCain and get a bug up his ass at irregular intervals about stupid shit like athletes on steroids.
I like the guy in a lot of ways, I just wish he was sane.