Contributors
Associate Editor Peter Suderman joins the reason staff after a stint as arts editor at the now-defunct Culture 11. His three favorite movies, for the record, are Taxi Driver, Fight Club, and Blade Runner—"because I am a stereotypical libertarian male," he explains. Suderman also has served as managing editor of National Review Online, as a writer at the D.C.-based policy shop FreedomWorks, and as assistant editorial director at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. As an undergraduate, he took time off from Asbury College in Kentucky to work at a Web development company before returning to school to get a degree from the University of North Florida in 2005. The dot-com "bubble had already burst," he says. "We were just living in Kentucky and didn't know it." At reason, he will write primarily about economic policy and health care, which he describes as "kinda fun."
Bill Flanigen, reason's current Burton C. Gray Memorial Intern, just graduated from George Washington University, where he was a senior editor at The Patriot, a "very mom-andpop conservative/libertarian" paper whose print edition had a "sporadic" publication schedule. A history major, Flanigen wrote his thesis about the Virginia constitutional convention of 1829; he confesses to exploiting his position as a library clerk to illicitly borrow books such as Democracy, Liberty and Property: The State Constitutional Conventions of the 1820s. He returned the tomes before graduating.
Our other summer intern, Amanda Carey, is a rising senior at Clemson University and reason's Charles G. Koch Summer Fellow. A political science major, Carey edits the Tiger Town Observer and is a junior fellow at the Clemson Institute for the Study of Capitalism. The latter position entails Friday afternoon get-togethers to talk "a little natural rights, a little Atlas Shrugged"; then "we always head over to Super Taco." Carey, who spent much of her summer transcribing interviews for Senior Editor Jacob Sullum, describes her stay at reason: "I learned a lot about drugs, actually."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
My only point is that if you take the Bible straight, as I'm sure many of Reasons readers do, you will see a lot of the Old Testament stuff as absolutely insane. Even some cursory knowledge of Hebrew and doing some mathematics and logic will tell you that you really won't get the full deal by just doing regular skill english reading for those books. In other words, there's more to the books of the Bible than most will ever grasp. I'm not concerned that Mr. Crumb will go to hell or anything crazy like that! It's just that he, like many types of religionists, seems to take it literally, take it straight...the Bible's books were not written by straight laced divinity students in 3 piece suits who white wash religious beliefs as if God made them with clothes on...the Bible's books were written by people with very different mindsets...in order to really get the Books of the Bible, you have to cultivate such a mindset, it's literally a labyrinth, that's no joke
fhdgtt
is good
thank u