Former Drug Lobbyist Named as Ted Kennedy's Replacement
Over at the Examiner, Tim Carney has done some helpful digging on Paul Kirk, the temporary appointee to Ted Kennedy's vacant Senate seat:
If a health-care overhaul clears the U.S. Senate this year, the key vote may be a former drug industry lobbyist who has helped raise millions of dollars from drug companies and insurers.
Paul Kirk, chosen by Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick to fill the seat of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy until a special election in January, will be the 60th Democratic senator, and he looks like a reliable vote for President Barack Obama's push to overhaul the health-care sector.
Kirk could deliver the 60th vote on health care—crucial to break a potential Republican filibuster—which would be fitting for a "reform" effort that will enrich the drug industry and could provide a boon for private insurers.
From 1996 through the end of 1999, Kirk lobbied on behalf of drug maker Hoechst Marion Roussel, which later changed its name to Aventis. Kirk, a lawyer at law firm Sullivan & Worcester, was the only registered lobbyist on Hoechst's account for those four years, in which the drug maker paid more than $150,000 for his lobbying on "FDA Reform legislation."
Kirk wrote on the forms that he lobbied only the U.S. Senate.
Carney's conclusion:
This is precisely the sort of revolving door Obama promised to shut down: Kirk was a top staffer for Kennedy, became a well-paid private sector lawyer, and then lobbied Kennedy's colleagues and presumably Kennedy on behalf of the very companies being regulated.
The GOP is looking to block Kirk's appointment on constitutional grounds.
Reason's Ron Bailey wrote about the corporate welfare buried in cap-and-trade legislation here, and noted how the Podesta family has benefited from energy lobbying here. I wrote about how the Obama administration empowers lobbyists here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
They are absolutely shameless in MA. And why shouldn't they be? No one will call them out on this.
And that is irrelevant; last I checked, Obama wasn't the governor of Massachussetts.
The Boston Globe article stated that Kennedy's family had been consulted by Gov Patrick and that Kirk had been their top choice.
Yay for hereditary seats in the legislature!
If I were to run my own news network, I would love to identify Senators by who gave them their job: Hatch would become the Senator from Disney, for example. 🙂
As lightly different take than tarran. He only promised to end this in the federal Executive Branch.
The GOP is looking to block Kirk's appointment on constitutional grounds.
They are just sroking off. Get over it GOPers, it;s done.
All Dem fanboys are now going to admit that Tom Delay's Texas redistricting shenanigans were completely legit after all. Right?
Nobody with an IQ in the triple digits thought Obama would keep lobbyists out of government. I wasn't surprised that he didn't even try. Also, this partisan appointment by the Beanstaters is beyond his purview anyway,
This is precisely the sort of revolving door Obama promised to shut down: Kirk was a top staffer for Kennedy, became a well-paid private sector lawyer, and then lobbied Kennedy's colleagues and presumably Kennedy on behalf of the very companies being regulated.
The Kirk won't necessarily stop revolving after he leaves the seat, either.
As an ex-Senator, he'll have lifetime access to the Senate floor, which is something lobbyists seem to covet. He'll be a hot commodity in the health-care lobbying field again. At least he'll probably be too ashamed to blather on about Public Service like his predecessor did...
This is precisely the sort of revolving door Obama promised to shut down: Kirk was a top staffer for Kennedy, became a well-paid private sector lawyer, and then lobbied Kennedy's colleagues and presumably Kennedy on behalf of the very companies being regulated.
Last I checked, Deval Patrick appointed him. Unless word comes out that Obama was specifically campaigning for Kirk, I don't see how this is tied to him.
I am Kirok!
why would the GOP be trying to block this? especially on CONSTITUTIONAL grounds of all things. the constitution doesn't get much respect from the GOP any other time.
They are just sroking off. Get over it GOPers, it;s done.
I can't imagine a court will actually block/delay his appointment, although it sounds like there are pretty good grounds for the challenge.
Its still bad PR for the Dems, though. The way they flop around denying Repub governors appointment powers, then give them to Dems, is embarrassing enough. Setting aside Mass constitutional requirements to rush a seat-warmer to Washington is just the cherry on top.
why would the GOP be trying to block this? especially on CONSTITUTIONAL grounds of all things. the constitution doesn't get much respect from the GOP any other time.
Because 90 extra days for people to think over the attempt to further socialize medicine is a good thing?
I'm Captain Kirk!!!
Lucky for us, this corruption is from people who believe in government:
http://volokh.com/posts/1253886830.shtml
Yay! An outsider!
Ah, well, best they don't care at any time then.
Wait, what? That's not what you meant?
Imagine my surprise.
so does anyone know, will Kirk get a Senator's salary for life as a retirement plan from the Senate, even tho he'll be in there for, what, 90 days?
Nice work if you can get it.....
Joe M -
SOME of us who live in MA are ashamed - but not any of the Dems up here. Just business as usual.
"Former Drug Lobbyist Named as Ted Kennedy's Replacement"
I'm still waiting for MA to name a replacement for Mary Jo.
so does anyone know, will Kirk get a Senator's salary for life as a retirement plan from the Senate, even tho he'll be in there for, what, 90 days?
Nice work if you can get it.....
No pension or lifetime salary, but all of the other perks last forever. Patrick pretty much gave him a golden ticket.
Just a Co-Author From the Neighborhood?
It's been a rumor since the 2008 presidential campaign that Bill Ayers ghost-wrote or co-wrote Barack Obama's memoir, Dreams from my Father. The story seems to be on fire again, though, because a new Obama-friendly book by best-selling author Chris Anderson, perhaps without realizing it, seems to confirm the rumor. Jack Cashill at the American Thinker has been investigating whether Ayers co-wrote the memoir for a while and recently picked up on key excerpts from Anderson's book, Barack and Michelle: Portrait of an American Marriage.
Cashill notes that as the deadline for Obama's memoir quickly approached, Michelle Obama recommended that her husband reach out to "his friend and Hyde Park neighbor Bill Ayers." Cashill goes on, "To flesh out his family history, Obama had taped
interviews with various family members. Andersen writes, 'These oral histories, along with a partial manuscript and a truckload of notes, were given to Ayers.' Andersen quotes a Hyde Park neighbor, 'Everyone knew they were friends and that they worked on various projects together. It was no secret. Why would it be? People liked them both.' Andersen continues, 'In the end, Ayers's contribution to Barack's Dreams From My Father would be significant--so much so that the book's language, oddly specific references, literary devices, and themes would bear a jarring similarity to Ayers's own writing.'"
Paul Kirk...will be the 60th Democratic senator...
...if you count Bobby Byrd. Given his state of health, his age and the fact that he hasn't been to the Senate floor in months, his vote is far from a sure thing. Don't you still have to actually be there to vote? Or will the Senate simply suspend that rule?
Since when does the GOP have a problem with lobbyists? When they are not on their team?
Since When does the GOP Obama not have a problem with lobbyists? When they are not on their on his team?.
Hey, who switched the preview button for the submit button?
So says the Masshole Judge:
"The (Republican) Party has not shown that it has a chance to succeed on the merits and, therefore, any risk of harm to the party will not outweigh the risk of harm to the governor and the commonwealth," Connolly wrote.
In other words, "did you guys really think I would side with you? Oh by the way, just to piss you off, I never once considered contitutionality. Suck it, bitches."
As predicted.
And how bizarre is it to balance the harm to a political party against the harm to the state as a whole in deciding a constitutional case?
I love how the Massachusetts legislature continually changes the rules for senatorial succession depending on the party of the current governor.
They should just call themselves a politburo.
I hope he can be as honest and loyal to the American people as our previous Senator, Kennedy!!!
I meant that in a joking way, but I said that because it seems this guy isn't going to favor socialized medicine, but who knows.
Well, to be fair, the state legislatures were supposed to directly select Senators before 1913. So it's hard to muster up too much outrage over the legislature essentially deciding who the senator will be.
But it does look corrupt as hell on its face.
Mass. GOP seeks to block Kennedy interim successor
(AP) - 15 hours ago
BOSTON - The Massachusetts Republican Party is seeking to block the interim appointment of Paul Kirk to the Senate seat that was held by the late Sen. Edward Kennedy.
The GOP has filed an injunction in Suffolk Superior Court that will be heard Friday morning.
Lawmakers this week passed legislation giving Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick the power to appoint an interim replacement, but laws approved in Massachusetts usually take 90 days to go into effect. Patrick signed an emergency letter that he says allows the law to become effective immediately.
And the imminent emergency was.......?
What has happened to the rule of law in our country?
Both major parties seem to have abandoned even any pretense of rule of law.