Recently at Reason.tv: Sam Tanenhaus on The Death of Conservatism
Sam Tanenhaus is the editor of The New York Times Book Review and the author, most recently, of The Death of Conservatism, a controversial new book which argues that the contemporary right has forsaken the intellectual rigor and seriousness of William F. Buckley and Whittaker Chambers in favor of shallow partisan politics.
On September 8, Reason.tv's Nick Gillespie sat down with Tanenhaus before he delivered a talk at Washington's American Enterprise Institute. "What conservatism has lost," says Tanenhaus, "is the capacity to elevate the argument. The genius of Buckley was that he made liberals think and write better."
Approximately 8.30 minutes. Shot by Meredith Bragg and Dan Hayes. Edited by Dan Hayes.
Go here for embed code and downloadable versions.
This is also available at Reason.tv's YouTube page (subscribe today).
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Amazingly similar to what Lionel Trilling wrote in 1950 in The Liberal Imagination, with his famous quotes that "In the United States at this time liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition." And "But the conservative impulse and the reactionary impulse...do not, with some isolated and some ecclesiastical exceptions, express themselves in ideas but only in action or in irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas." And he wasn't defending classical liberalism, either, as this was post-New Deal. So this criticism has always been thus from liberals.
Apparently Maureen Dowd did not get the memo.
Sounds to me like someone has a wee bit too much spare time on their hands here.
Jess
http://www.real-privacy.net.tc
The genius of Buckley was that he made liberals think and write better
Conservatism has been brain-dead for 50 years. The left wins by default.
So this authors definition of true conservative is a CIA operative (Buckley) and a guy (Chambers) so dumb that he actually thought at one time that communism could work.
No mention of changing demographics? Tsk-tsk-tsk.
Here's a better diagnosis.
NAM? Really?? I would misspell your name as Dick Host if that wouldn't get me a wrist-slap as a homophobe.