Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Culture

Pre-Friday Fun Link

Jesse Walker | 8.6.2009 10:19 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

A funny story about a heathen's adventures at God camp.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Google: The Next Microsoft (As in, Target of Federal Antitrust Enforcers)

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

CultureReligion
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (37)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Mad Max   16 years ago

    'A funny story'

    Yes, I'm sure Chris Rock is trembling in his boots for fear of the competition.

    And I would like to thank Timmy Reed for reminding us how insufferable atheists can be. I should know, since I used to be one myself. (used to be an atheist, I mean - I'm still insufferable, but in comparison to how insufferable I was as an atheist, my current persona is downright Mister Rogers - esque).

  2. Lester Hunt   16 years ago

    I'm an atheist but I am extremely sufferable.

  3. Daniel Reeves   16 years ago

    I'm an atheist and I'm kind of insufferable.

  4. squarooticus   16 years ago

    I guess I'm "sufferable" in the sense that religion almost never comes up as a topic: I don't preemptively scoff at religious nuts, but I tend to avoid situations in which my atheism would be an issue.

  5. Tositos   16 years ago

    I wish fun things ever happened to me in life ever.

  6. Mike Laursen   16 years ago

    I should know, since I used to be one myself.

    What turned you? Were you like a I'm-an-atheist-because-religion-is-irrational atheist, or an I'm-an-atheist-because-I'm-mad-at-God atheist? If the former, I'm going to guess it was a dame, because that's the only thing that makes a rational man turn all irrational. If the latter, you weren't really ever an atheist.

  7. Mike Laursen   16 years ago

    By the way, I was going for moderate insufferability there.

  8. johnl   16 years ago

    That's not right Mike. *All* guys are atheists, but some pretend not to be for girls, and when that works for them, it's not irrational.

  9. EoT   16 years ago

    I really didn't think that guy was so bad. He admitted his actions were youthful misbehavior, and none of his jokes were vicious or even that mean.

    Honestly, people are way too sensitive about religion.

    Which makes them so deliciously easy to troll....

  10. ????   16 years ago

    I'll say!

  11. AkaDad   16 years ago

    I'm an Agnostic, which means there's a slight chance that I'm not insufferable, but in all likelihood I am.

  12. Zoe at that camp   16 years ago

    Suffer the little atheists to come to me.

  13. Elliott   16 years ago

    If theists are irrational, are not atheists? Unless one's atheism is coupled with agnosticism - that is, agnostic atheism - but I'd assume most atheists AND theists are also agnostic. (Few people are arrogant enough to claim they 'know.')

    At any rate, libertarians are usually rational. But I guess a person can be rational in one respect and irrational in another... to a point.

  14. Art-P.O.G.   16 years ago

    But I guess a person can be rational in one respect and irrational in another... to a point.

    Not really a guess, more of an axiom. Some people are more rational than others, but I've seen little evidence of a completely rational person. I don't even know if being completely rational would be a good thing.

  15. Jim Stewert   16 years ago

    Wow, you go boi! I like it!

    RT
    http://www.anon-web-tools.net.tc

  16. domoarrigato   16 years ago

    That's not right Mike. *All* guys are atheists, but some pretend not to be for girls

    I've often thought that religion is a priviledge of comfort for the weaker sex.

  17. ktc2   16 years ago

    Elliott,

    So, is it arrogant to claim "to know" there is no Zeus or Odin as well?

  18. ktc2   16 years ago

    Domoarrigato,

    And yet oddly, few things in this world are more anti-woman than the major monotheistic religions.

    Kind of reminds me of this quote:

    "It's interesting to speculate how it developed that in two of the most anti-feminist institutions, the church and the law court, the men are wearing the dresses." - Flo Kennedy -

  19. domoarrigato   16 years ago

    Mad Max | August 6, 2009, 10:44pm | #

    ... I mean - I'm still insufferable

    Repeated for posterity

  20. domoarrigato   16 years ago

    And yet oddly, few things in this world are more anti-woman than the major monotheistic religions.

    odd that a force that deeply captures the imagination of women is used by non-believeing a-hole men to subjugate them? not really.

  21. Elliott   16 years ago

    So, is it arrogant to claim "to know" there is no Zeus or Odin as well?

    No, that's rational. But I don't understand the comparison of God to the Flying Spaghetti Monster (and things of that nature). The concept of God (and really anything beyond cognition) is too expansive and abstract for that comparison to work.

    And sure, that's why I don't want religions having holds on government, but I'm not fond of government in any incarnation.

  22. Elliott   16 years ago

    Shucks, I forgot to put a winking smiley after "No, that's rational." If you would pretend it's there, I'd appreciate that.

  23. Elliott   16 years ago

    I forgot the winking smiley again. I've noticed the absence of the winking smiley often causes others to misunderstand my messages - which is to say, I'm a bad writer.

  24. strike through   16 years ago

    We're all born atheists. Then the brainwashing begins.

  25. ktc2   16 years ago

    If the evidence for the existance of the xtian god, the Norse god and the Greek god are all roughly equivalent (i.e. there is no scientific evidence for any of them), than why is it rational to completely reject the existance later two but not the first?

  26. ktc2   16 years ago

    "Later" and "first" as in order of occurrence in my sentence, not in history obviously.

  27. Spoonman   16 years ago

    Oh, fuck this thread.

  28. Doctor Duck   16 years ago

    The only 'rational' atheism is apatheism

    If you just ignore all that shit, how can you be insufferable?

  29. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    ktc2,

    The one problem with that is that we lack knowledge and, probably, the capacity to assess whether there's any sort of deity. That line of reasoning is more effective if you're attacking one religion (because the lack of proof supporting each works against all of them) but not against theism in general.

  30. Elliott   16 years ago

    If the evidence for the existance of the xtian god, the Norse god and the Greek god are all roughly equivalent (i.e. there is no scientific evidence for any of them), than why is it rational to completely reject the existance later two but not the first?

    That doesn't make them equal, even roughly. It just groups them together.

    That's beside the point. Theism does not equal any of them. If theism equals Christianity as well as, say, Islam, then Christianity would equal Islam.

    My point is, the antiquated stories of God killing firstborns and talking to humans is absurd, sure, but why reject ideas entirely? I said it's rational not to believe in the existence of Zeus or Odin, and you extended that statement to mean that I think it's rational to believe in the Christian god.

  31. R C Dean   16 years ago

    We're all born atheists agnostic. Then the brainwashing begins.

  32. Pro Libertate   16 years ago

    Militant agnosticism.

  33. Kevin   16 years ago

    It's anecdotal, but it seems most of the theists I know claim to know that God exists with more certainty than I'm willing to claim that I know Obama exists. Many of them even claim to know that, deep-down, I believe that God exists too, but I'm just denying it for some reason. But most atheists I know are "soft" atheists who lack belief in God but don't deny God in absolute terms. Even Dawkins believes that there "almost certainly is no God."

    In most dictionaries, atheism can be defined as a lack of a belief in God, but not necessarily an active disbelief, so, in some sense of the word, all agnostics, who neither believe, nor disbelieve, are atheists because they lack a positive belief in a god. But theism is defined more-or-less strictly as a belief in a God. So I don't really see how a theist can also be an agnostic except through inconsistency. Maybe part of a person believes, but another part doubts?

    And how is another god more expansive and abstract than the Spaghetti Monster?

  34. Mike Laursen   16 years ago

    If theists are irrational, are not atheists?

    As far as I'm concerned, people who don't believe in any of the traditional god-based religions and call themselves agnostics are just being wishy-washy. That includes those who have vague new age beliefs that there may be like some kind of universal energy thing, that's like, you know, the traditional concept of god. If a Baptist or a Catholic secretly snickers at your vaguely-defined, non-committal religious beliefs, you're are, for all practical purposes, an atheist.

  35. Mike Laursen   16 years ago

    The only 'rational' atheism is apatheism

    Never heard that word before. Thanks for introducing it to me.

  36. Mike Laursen   16 years ago

    And how is another god more expansive and abstract than the Spaghetti Monster?

    To be honest, I find your Flying Spaghetti Monster beliefs to be absurd.

  37. twv   16 years ago

    One Friday every month I shed a tear for all the dead gods. They used to romp and cavort and plot and scheme and go about their celestial roles, keeping the universe together, allowing humanity to find some relief from finitude.

    But then came monotheism. It started out as a "public option," but, well, you know.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts in Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Wait, Lilo & Stitch Is About Medicaid and Family Separation?

Peter Suderman | 5.30.2025 1:59 PM

Trump Wants $25 Million To Settle His Meritless 60 Minutes Lawsuit

Joe Lancaster | 5.30.2025 1:45 PM

Two Courts Have Ruled Against Trump's Tariffs—but Not for the Same Reasons

Jack Nicastro | 5.30.2025 1:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!