â€œUnlike Winston, she had grasped the inner meaning of the Partyâ€™s sexual puritanism. It was not merely that the sex instinct created a world of its own which was outside the Partyâ€™s control and which therefore had to be destroyed if possible. What was more important was that sexual privation induced hysteria, which was desirable because it could be transformed into war-fever and leader-worship.â€
So wrote George Orwell in 1984, his dystopian vision of a future where mankindâ€™s every thought, desire, and bodily tingle would be policed by the powers that be. Orwell imagined a Junior Anti-Sex League that spied on kissing and cavorting adults, and a ruling Party that sought to squash the â€œsex impulse.â€ The heroes of his nightmarish tale had to sneak off to a wood in order to explore each otherâ€™s bodies in a bit of peace and quiet.
It turns out that Orwell was suffering from premature speculation. It was not in 1984 that a major Western government made the â€œsex impulseâ€â€"the grunting, groaning sex instinctâ€"into a police matter; it was in 2009. Here in the U.K., to add to our existing panoply of Orwellian measuresâ€"5 million closed-circuit TV cameras that watch our every move; â€œspeaking camerasâ€ that warn us to pick up litter or stop loitering; the governmentâ€™s attempt to recruit child spies to re-educate anti-social adultsâ€"we now have the bizarre and terrifying situation where a woman has been arrested for having sex too loudly. In modern-day Britain, even the decibels of our sexual moaning can become the subject of a police investigation.
At the end of April, Caroline Cartwright, a 48-year-old housewife from Wearside in the northeast of England, was remanded in custody for having â€œexcessively noisy sex.â€ The cops took her in after neighbors complained of hearing her â€œshouting and groaningâ€ and her â€œbed banging against the wall of her home.â€ Cartwright has, quite reasonably, defended her inalienable right to be a howler: â€œI canâ€™t stop making noise during sex,â€ she told The Daily Mail. â€œItâ€™s unnatural to not make any noises, and I donâ€™t think that I am particularly loud.â€
Pleasurable groaning and bed banging are common noises in crowded towns and cities across the civilized world. Most of us deal with them by sticking a CD in the stereo. Those who complain are normally told to stop being prudish or to have a discreet chat with the creators of the offending sex sounds. So how did Cartwrightâ€™s expressions of noisy joy become a police case, scheduled to be ruled on at Newcastle Crown Court, one of the biggest courts in the north of England? Because, unbelievably, Cartwright had previously been served with an anti-social behavior order (ASBO)â€"a civil order used to control the minutiae of British peopleâ€™s behaviorâ€"that forbade her from making â€œexcessive noise during sexâ€ anywhere in England.
Thatâ€™s right. Going even further than Orwellâ€™s imagined authoritarian hellhole, where at least there was a wood or two where people could indulge their sexual impulses, the local authorities in Wearside made all of England a no-go zone for Cartwrightâ€™s noisy shenanigans. If she wanted to howl with abandon, she would have to nip over the border to Scotland or maybe catch a ferry to France. It was because she breached the conditions of her ASBO, the civil ruling about how much noise she can make while making love in England, that Cartwright was arrested.
This case sheds harsh light not only on the Victorian-style petty prudishness of Britainâ€™s rulers, who seriously believe they can make sexually expressive women timid again by dragging them to court, but on the tyranny of anti-social behavior orders themselves, which were introduced by our authoritarian Labour government in 1998. Anyone can apply for an ASBO to stop anyone else from doing something they find irritating, â€œalarming,â€ or â€œthreatening.â€
Local magistratesâ€™ courts issue the orders, sometimes on the basis of hearsay evidence (which is permissible in ASBO cases). In short, the applicant for an ASBO does not have to go through the normal rigors of the criminal justice system to get a civil ruling preventing someone he doesnâ€™t like from doing something he finds â€œalarmingâ€ or â€œdangerous.â€ Once you have been branded with an ASBO, if you break its conditionsâ€"by having noisy sex in your own home, for exampleâ€"you are potentially guilty of a crime and can be imprisoned.
The ASBO system has turned much of Britain into a curtaintwitching, neighbor-watching, noisepolicing gang of spies. The relative ease with which one can apply to the authorities for an ASBO positively invites people to use the system to punish their foes or the irritants who live in their neighborhoods. ASBOs have been used to prevent young people in certain areas from wearing hoods or hats (they look â€œthreateningâ€), to ban a middle-aged couple from playing gangsta rap (the expletives offended workers and children at a nearby kindergarten), and to prevent a 10-year-old boy from having contact with matches until he turns 16, after he was found to have started a fire.
And now, prudish people who previously would have been told to â€œput up or shut upâ€ over their neighborsâ€™ noisy sex have been empowered to turn one womanâ€™s private affairs into a very public trial. This, too, is Orwellian: the creation of new layers of spies and inter-communal suspicion.
In Orwellâ€™s dystopia, â€œthe sexual act, successfully performed, was rebellion.â€ So it is in Wearside in 2009, where the excessively noisy exploits of Cartwright and her possibly very talented partner are a form of rebellion against the arbitrary and interventionist nature of the ASBO-wielding authorities. They are screwing for liberty.
Brendan Oâ€™Neill (Brendan.ONeill@spiked-online.com) is the editor of Spiked.