Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Civil Liberties

Affirmative Action (Police State Edition)

Jesse Walker | 6.17.2009 1:03 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The Guardian reports:

Thousands of people are being stopped and searched by the police under counter-terrorism powers simply to provide a racial balance in official statistics, the [U.K.] government's official anti-terror law watchdog has revealed.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Berlau on Obama's New Regs: So Much for That

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Civil Liberties
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (25)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Pro Libertate   17 years ago

    Whoa.

  2. Warty   17 years ago

    It's pretty rare that a government's stupidity manages to surprise me. Kudos, UK.

  3. Cabeza de Vaca   17 years ago

    This doesn't suprise me at all.

  4. John   17 years ago

    "None of the many thousands of searches had ever led to a conviction for a terrorist offence, he said. He noted, too, that the damage done to community relations was "undoubtedly considerable"."

    That is right, none. They haven't found one blasted thing doing these searches. I would love to rip on Britian, but doesn't the TSA do the same thing here? Be sure to pick out the old lady from Kansas for special scrutiny so that no one will think we are racists.

  5. Cabeza de Vaca   17 years ago

    "I would love to rip on Britian, but doesn't the TSA do the same thing here? Be sure to pick out the old lady from Kansas for special scrutiny so that no one will think we are racists."

    Exactly.

  6. Warty   17 years ago

    My grandma loves when she gets taken aside in the airport for special security, John. They're keeping us safe.

  7. mike   17 years ago

    This actually demonstrates deeper thinking than the TSA strategy. Where the TSA picks obviously unthreatening individuals in order to avoid the appearance of profiling, the Brits realized they can keep checking all the brown people if they just check a few thousand more white people to balance things out. Whoever had this idea knows a thing or two about being a bureaucrat.

  8. JB   17 years ago

    Britain is run by complete fucktards.

  9. MNG   17 years ago

    "Britain is run by complete fucktards."

    With bad teeth.

  10. Strayhorn   17 years ago

    Wow. Orwell really was an optimist.

  11. Jaybird   17 years ago

    I realized that I had been co-opted when I saw that I had been pulled aside for special screening and, instead of thinking something that involved that Austrian fellow, I thought "good, I get to skip the line".

  12. Cloner   17 years ago

    "Where the TSA picks obviously unthreatening individuals in order to avoid the appearance of profiling'

    I love getting picked. I always tell them, make certain to check under the scrotum.

  13. doubled   17 years ago

    Inconvience and piss off the lawful to avoid inconviencing and offending the lawless. Nice. How did we get here again?

  14. Julio   17 years ago

    Federal prosecutors have offered Detroit City Councilwoman Monica Conyers a plea deal as part of their wide-ranging investigation of City Hall corruption, but she has not accepted it, the Free Press learned today.

    The development comes a day after the U.S. Attorney's Office revealed that two key figures in a sludge-disposal deal admitted paying Conyers thousands of dollars in bribes to secure her support for a $1.2-billion city contract with Synagro Technologies. Conyers, who initially opposed the 2007 deal, switched her position as the council voted 5-4 to let Synagro dispose of wastewater sludge.

    http://www.freep.com/article/20090616/NEWS01/90616057/Monica+Conyers+faces+deadline+for+plea+deal

  15. Julio   17 years ago

    Earlier in the day, Conyers addressed the controversy during her weekly live television program on WHPR-TV (Channel 33), but gave no indication of what she would do.

    "I just want to say that first and foremost publicly that I am a child of God," she said. "And that all these things that are going on right now that I believe in my heart that God will deliver me from them. And so I say to all of the people out there if you're not praying for me, then you're just adding to the problem.

  16. Julio   17 years ago

    Why is God so hard on his brown children? They endure so much!

  17. Geoff Nathan   17 years ago

    Actually Britain is getting it doubly wrong. See, the whole idea is to do RANDOM screening. If you do targeted screening (AKA 'profiling') then the bad guys can just recruit someone without the requisite characteristics and they'll skip right through. If the screening is truly random then it actually works.
    But Britain is doing simulated random screening--screening 'brown people', then adding lots of non-browns to make it look as if they are not discriminating. If you really want to make planes safe (not that they are actually in any danger in the first place, but that's a different story) then you have to make the screening totally NON-predictable. But both the TSA and the British equivalent are doing security theater, not real security.
    For real security, try flying into or out of Israel. There they conduct interviews that are likely to actually find the bad guys. I know--I experienced a couple several months ago.

  18. Seamus   17 years ago

    "I just want to say that first and foremost publicly that I am a child of God,"

    She ought to consider the possibility that God is about to send her to a long time-out in jail.

  19. Brandybuck   17 years ago

    Be sure to pick out the old lady from Kansas for special scrutiny so that no one will think we are racists.

    I do a lot of flying, and I've noticed that those getting the specialized wand treatment invariably fall into one of two categories: 1) The woman with large purse and gazillion bottles of liquids/gels/lotions she cannot live without; and 2) some harmless and bewildered old guy.

    p.s. I'm flying out again this weekend, so I'll make sure to confirm my confirmation bias on this point.

  20. dbcooper   17 years ago

    This happened to me last year. The cop was pretty apologetic, straight forward with the reason for the stop, and chatted to me about rugby.

  21. Some Guy   17 years ago

    That is right, none. They haven't found one blasted thing doing these searches. I would love to rip on Britian, but doesn't the TSA do the same thing here? Be sure to pick out the old lady from Kansas for special scrutiny so that no one will think we are racists.

    How many terrorists were caught as a result of the non-white lady from Kansas searches?

  22. Robert   17 years ago

    If the screening is truly random then it actually works.

    How? By stopping a percentage of terrorists equal to the percentage of population screened?

  23. Aaron Boyden   17 years ago

    Sounds good to me. If they're stopping everybody, then everybody knows what a nuisance the police are being, and can sensibly evaluate whether any possible added safety is worth the hassle. Otherwise, the whites will let the police get away with anything without a second glance if it's only being done to brown people, and obviously that'll produce a bit of justified resentment among the brown people.

  24. Sean Healy   17 years ago

    I made it through Israeli pre-flight security drunk off my ass a few weeks ago. Let's just say the M16-toting 19 year old girl who interrogated me on the way out inspired emotions other than fear.

  25. Isaac Bartram   17 years ago

    According to the article, these searches have nothing to do with airport screenings or even some other more questionable but security related procedure, like scrutiny and even bag searches on public transit.

    These are random stops and searches of members of the public in the course of their daily lives. Even the most ardent security mom in America would be outraged if these kinds of searches were even contemplated by law enforcement here.

    An example in the story, a middle aged diplomat, stopped over during his morning commute. No suspicious activity, no probable cause, no nothing. Just pulled over and random and interrogated and searched.

    Instead of being outraged at the way this policy is being implemented, the Gruniad should be outraged that the policy exists at all in a country that once prized "English Liberties".

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Research Suggests People Who Work From Home Are Having More Babies

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the January 2026 issue

The John Galt of Comic Books

Brian Doherty | From the January 2026 issue

Here Are 5 Wars Trump Started or Expanded in 2025

Matthew Petti | 12.26.2025 1:00 PM

Justice Department Says Filming Immigration Raids Is 'Domestic Terrorism'

Autumn Billings | 12.26.2025 10:00 AM

From Nixon to Trump, the 'War on Drugs' Has Been a Disaster for Americans' Freedom

Steven Greenhut | 12.26.2025 7:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks