Earlier today I uncritically passed along a numbers-dump by pollster Mark Penn claiming that there were 20 million Americans blogging, of whom exactly 452,000 were using it as their primary source of income. As I know well but conveniently forgot, there are people who, unlike Mark Penn, have studied these numbers closely over the years, and they say Penn's full of it. Here's the longtime Salon tech journalist Scott Rosenberg, author of a new book on my desk entitled Say Everything: How Blogging Began, What It's Becoming, and Why It Matters.
The methodology of Penn's piece seems to be: gather as many numbers as you can and don't worry about the fact that they are from many different sources at different times using different methodologies and even differing definitions of what it means to "be a blogger" — just toss them all together and start drawing conclusions. Those conclusions, in turn, seem to be based on a misapprehension that bloggers are by definition opinion writers. Many are, to be sure; but many others — particularly in the "pro blog" world Penn focuses on — concentrate on becoming expert sources in a particular area, or informational services, or link reviews.
So there you have it.
Link via Romenesko, where you can also learn that "Newspaper movies get made because good drama usually involves moral dilemmas -- and when it comes to complicated choices, the daily work of a newspaper reporter is a perfect vehicle."
UPDATE: That "Fail" image above was created by Jason Lefkowitz, who would love it if Penn himself was aware of that fact.
Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
[...]gather as many numbers as you can and don't worry about the fact that they are from many different sources at different times using different methodologies and even differing definitions of what it means[...]
Wasn't the World Health Organization using this very method for statistical reporting on AIDS in Africa in the late 90's?
"Newspaper movies get made because good drama usually involves moral dilemmas -- and when it comes to complicated choices, the daily work of a newspaper reporter is a perfect vehicle."
Give me a fucking break. It seems most journalists have a hole in their back, because they are so fucking busy patting themselves there over how courageous and necessary they supposedly are.
If there are really 452,000 bloggers relying on their blogs as their primary source of income, a great number of them are either homeless or on food stamps.
I had a blog that was in the top 500,000 in traffic and I made more money before lunch in my day job than I did all year from the blog.
Wasn't the World Health Organization using this very method for statistical reporting on AIDS in Africa in the late 90's?
His methodology seems valid as the same technique is utilized by climatologists and blessed by the IPCC.
K-Rod Returns !!!
"Newspaper movies get made because good drama usually involves moral dilemmas -- and when it comes to complicated choices, the daily work of a newspaper reporter is a perfect vehicle."
Give me a fucking break. It seems most journalists have a hole in their back, because they are so fucking busy patting themselves there over how courageous and necessary they supposedly are.
If there are really 452,000 bloggers relying on their blogs as their primary source of income, a great number of them are either homeless or on food stamps.
I had a blog that was in the top 500,000 in traffic and I made more money before lunch in my day job than I did all year from the blog.
Mark Penn? Wasn't he Hillary's chief pollster?