NYT's Kakutani on the Heroic Hunk of La Cabaña
Writing in the New York Times, Michiko Kakutani reviews journalist Michael Casey book Che's Afterlife: The Legacy of an Image, a meditation on Alberto Korda's iconic photo of the brutal (but handsome!) Argentinean revolutionary. The first attempt at crafting a Guevera "brand," Casey points out, was by his former compañero Fidel Castro, shortly before Guevera was killed in Bolivia:
It was a clever marketing plan on Mr. Castro's part: Che's denunciations of the Soviet Union made him popular among "thinkers and artists of the Western European left, many of whom had lost faith in the Soviet Union," while his condemnation of imperialism "sat well with young radical students in the United States and Europe, who were impatient for societal change and for whom the very word revolution was inspiring."
It's a decent piece, free of most of the mythologizing one consistently finds in press accounts of Guevera's nasty, brutish, and short life (though an article on Che that fails to mention his stint as executioner at La Cabaña prison is sort of like a piece on Squeaky Fromm that ignores her vacation cottage at Spahn Ranch. In Che's Afterlife, Casey writes, with just a touch of understatement, that the stories from La Cabaña "paint a disturbing picture of Che."). Kakutani is a bit off, though, when dismissing those who have tried to correct the Che-as-freedom-fighter myth:
Though anti-Castro Cubans continue to denounce him as a murderer with a cold capacity for violence, Che is embraced in Latin America and the Middle East and by antiglobalization protestors as "a die-hard foe of yanqui imperialism"; in Hong Kong as a symbol of rebellion against the authoritarianism of the Beijing government; and in the United States by immigrant activists, demanding "the right to inclusion, to be considered part of the American Dream."
Kakutani observes inadvertently that only those with direct experience of Guevera's murderous reign in Cuba—Cuban exiles—have a negative opinion of him. This is a great oversimplification, as is the idea that he is uniformly "embraced" in Latin America. After an informal check, it appears that Reason.tv has no Cuban exiles on staff, though my colleagues Ted Balaker, Nick Gillespie, and Alex Manning managed to produce the terrific video Killer Chic:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A great cartoon about the real pirates:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/cartoons.aspx
Back to the topic, my favorite picture of Ernesto:
http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9512/che_excavation/che.jpg
Every Che-worshipper should be slapped once, firmly, across the face. And then they should get a swift kick in the rear. Just once. If that doesn't fix the problem, nothing will.
Bonus: We can create a new government agency to do it as part of the stimulus package, cause what matters is that the money is spent, not that it's spent efficiently!
"Kakutani observes inadvertently that only those with direct experience of Guevera's murderous reign in Cuba-Cuban exiles-have a negative opinion of him."
Obviously, they are simply reactionary bourgeois trying to undermine the Glorious Workers' Revolution!
Irony? You decide.
Every Che-worshipper should be slapped once, firmly, across the face.
Like that will ever happen.
I haven't given up hope that in 50 years or so it'll become 'chic' to debunk Che-chic though.
50 years ago Christopher Columbus was a mythologized hero, and eventually it became cool to talk about him as a genocidal mass murderer. So I suppose eventually people will have to admit that Che Guevara was at least as bad.
I couldn't get through Motorcycle Diaries. Such hagiographic bullshit would be hard to take on someone I liked; watching it about a mass murderer was unbearable.
I waiting for the day when the children of envirowhackos bitch about "Big Solar" or "Big Fusion" or whatever magic green technology has replaced oil thanks to The Won.
Pre-empting the grammar nazis: "I'm waiting..."
Hazel Meade,
I highly doubt it will ever be "chic" to debunk Che-chic. Mostly because the people with the time on their hands on to make something "chic" rarely hold real jobs, and latch onto the worst idols.
"I waiting for the day when the children of envirowhackos bitch about "Big Solar" or "Big Fusion" "
You're just shilling for Big Rabbit Crap!
Hey, that's Squeaky Fromme with an "e" at the end. Failed presidential assassins get no respect.
"Though anti-nazi Westerners continue to denounce him as a murderer with a cold capacity for violence, Adoph Hitler is embraced in the Middle East and parts of Europe and America and by skinheads and pan-Arabists as "a die-hard foe of Jewish imperialism"
There fixed it. It says the same thing just in terms people can understand. The guy who wrote that sentence as it referred to Guavera is a fuckwad.
I waiting for the day when the children of envirowhackos bitch about "Big Solar" or "Big Fusion" or whatever magic green technology has replaced oil thanks to The Won.
Neither is going to replace oil any time soon. We're more likely to start experiencing energy shortages.
When our living standards fall, people will start caring less about the environment.
Too bad that the enviros with their socialist tendencies are sowing the seeds for exactly the kind of economic stagnation that will undermine their own goals.
We'll have "clean coal"... produced by state-run unionized coal industries doing mountaintop removal.
I highly doubt it will ever be "chic" to debunk Che-chic. Mostly because the people with the time on their hands on to make something "chic" rarely hold real jobs, and latch onto the worst idols.
I highly recommend you watch 'The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford'.
Jesse James used to be mythologized as a 'robin-hood' type figure - showing up in Bob Dylan's lyrics, for instance.
The film totally debunks that image. Jesse James was a proto-klansman, ex-irregular, fighting on behalf of the Confederacy. Also a sociopathic murderer.
But the film is actually about the phenomenon of mythologizing certain figures in general. On a personal level, you have this story about someone who believes in the 'myth' of Jesse James and gets disillusioned when he's exposed to the reality.
Fantastic movie. Really a lesson to anyone tempted to hold up Che Guevara, or Jesse James, or Pancho Villa, or any other similar figure as a hero.
occasionally these things do come full circle.
I heard that was a good movie Hazel. I will have to watch it. It is interesting how myths work. When I went to grade school in Kansas, James was portrayed as basically a terrorist. Then I went to Missouri, where he was from, and I got the whole bullshit robin hood myth.
"only those with direct experience of Guevera's murderous reign in Cuba-Cuban exiles-have a negative opinion of him"
Well, that is pretty bad reasoning, as of course those who left the nation because of the movement Che was a part of are going to have a negative opinion of him...
Che was a cheap, brutal thug.
But I would think one might want to know, why in the world do so many in the 3rd world like the guy?
Maybe because there was horrible, horrible, government backed inqeuality and repression that Che was seen as standing up to, and the U.S. was seen as sanctioning or backing...
Maybe because there was horrible, horrible, government backed inqeuality and repression that Che was seen as standing up to, and the U.S. was seen as sanctioning or backing...
Yeah, and Pol Pot was just some guy who figured he had 'way to many Cambodians.
Just don't get me going on the traitor George Washington.
.. "Whiskey Rebellion" Hobbit
to = too
.. joez law
But I would think one might want to know, why in the world do so many in the 3rd world like the guy?
Maybe because there was horrible, horrible, government backed inqeuality and repression that Che was seen as standing up to, and the U.S. was seen as sanctioning or backing...
Yes, and no.
This isn't about "government-backed" inequality, so much as capitalism vs. communism. Most of the people on the left saw, and still see, the capitalist system as a system of oppression and exploitation. Which is why they supported Marxist guerilla movements like those Guevara was involved in.
In order to view America's anti-communism as an act of "oppression" you first have to see capitalism as oppressive and communism as liberating. If you aren't looking at it through that historical lens, then Che is no liberating hero, and America is no repressive imperialist.
Try looking at it through the other lens. We were RIGHT to oppose all these Marxist-Leninist-Socialist movements. Millions of people in Latin America are freer today, and economically better off, because of our "meddling". But we get no credit for that. Instead, the psycho left continues to insist that we're a bunch of evil capitalists bent on exploiting those poor Latin Americans. Cuba is a socialist paradise, and Mexico is a sweatshop ridden maquiladora hellhole.
All the peasants of the 3rd world probably knew of communism was the rhetoric, and all they knew of the US was its support of regimes which used force and fraud, or supported the results of past systems of force and fraud, to put them in the crappy place they were.
Who cares if the psycho left of the US love Che? What should concern us is his appeal to the peasants of the 3rd world. And that is somewhat understandable is my argument...
Hazel
The U.S., in taking a massive dump on the 3rd world poor, and supporting regimes which targeted opposition, made it so that for many of those folks the only alternative to shitsville was Marxist-Leninist-Socialist regimes...We're not faultless there...
MNG,
Maybe it's just possible that the US and European left TOLD THEM that we were rich and they were poor because we stole from them. Ya think?
I doubt they really understood much of Marxism-Leninism other than the rhetoric. However, it's very easy to tell a poor person that the reason he's poor is because he was stolen from. It's much harder to teach him economics.
It's easy to say "your life sucks because of those evil people exploiting you. go kill them."
It's difficult to say "your life sucks because of a complex combination of institutional and cultural weaknesses and a lack of industrial development."
John, why did you have to go and Godwin the thread? Why, John?
We have that turgid, syphilitic, rabble-rousing, now-embalmed piece of shit Lenin to thank for the popularity of Marxism in the third world. I think it might be worth the death sentence I would get to go to Moscow and blow up the rat's coffin.
Nah, on second thought, I'm just too lazy.
When watching that video, one thing really stood out: the laughable yet stomach-turning faux-earnestness of Sean Penn as he announced to the audience at Cannes that Del Toro had won another bullshit "let's pat ourselves on the back" award. His pathetic, deliberative posturing is indicative of everything that is wrong with Hollywood: the belief that their utterances are somehow more weighty than those of the common man because they make $20 million for 2 months work; the bullshit notion that what actors do is so necessary and vital to the health of the United States. The ridiculous belief that their political utterances reveal how brave they are, even though working in an ideologically homogenous Hollywood and living in the United States pretty much guarantees they will suffer no real consequences for their "activism"'. Or perhaps it is their smug assertions that latching on to the latest cause du jour (Darfur, Tibet, debt forgiveness) somehow makes people who get paid to act like Moe Howard, for example, worthy of taking a seat next to global decisions makers. These preening pieces of shit are a fucking joke.
"All the peasants of the 3rd world probably knew of communism was the rhetoric, and all they knew of the US was its support of regimes which used force and fraud, or supported the results of past systems of force and fraud, to put them in the crappy place they were."
Instead of speaking in generalities, perhaps you should give us concrete examples of what the US has done to so wrong those of the third world.
"Or perhaps it is their smug assertions that latching on to the latest cause du jour (Darfur, Tibet, debt forgiveness) somehow makes people who get paid to act like Moe Howard, for example, worthy of taking a seat next to global decisions makers."
Given that many "global decision makers" are political slugs, I figure these useless twits aren't bringing down the average too much.
Did I just "useless twits"? I meant useful idiots.
"Well, that is pretty bad reasoning, as of course those who left the nation because of the movement Che was a part of are going to have a negative opinion of him..."
Yeah, and you also forgot to add all the people who have half a brain and are repulsed by mass murderers will have a negative opinion of him.
"Well, that is pretty bad reasoning, as of course those who left the nation because of the movement Che was a part of are going to have a negative opinion of him..."
You are so right. The dislike of Guevara is entirely due to the animosity those unforgiving grudge-holders have concerning their flight from Cuba. Those he forced to leave were probably all stooges who worked for the previous horrible regime; they just won't let go. All those murderers he committed, the torturing of dissenters and political opponents? Those were merely the result of quirky personality traits that made him all the more charming, right?
"Che was a cheap, brutal thug."
Given the content of your other posts, the above sentence wins the "Most Unconvincing Statement or Qualification of 2009 Award".
We have that turgid, syphilitic, rabble-rousing, now-embalmed piece of shit Lenin to thank for the popularity of Marxism in the third world. I think it might be worth the death sentence I would get to go to Moscow and blow up the rat's coffin.
Do you have, like, a profile on some online dating site somewhere I can check out?
B
You're not what one would call "smart" are you?
Yes, those that left Cuba probably hate Che and Castro because of the things they did to them, fucking duh, that was my point. MM made imo a poor point by arguing thus: "well, the author didn't mention what those who were brutalized and opposed by Che thought of them, and they had a familiarity with him." This would be like saying "well, the author of a book on George Washington did not ask people who actually had a familiarity with him, like the Redcoats."
A better argument would be to point to anyone who came across the guy's path.
"Instead of speaking in generalities, perhaps you should give us concrete examples of what the US has done to so wrong those of the third world."
You really need me to list the petty dictators and thugs we have provided support to in that area in the past? Or our direct military interventions in S. America? Jesus read a book. Or just go to the internet
http://www2.truman.edu/~marc/resources/interventions.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Public_Safety#Uruguay
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Charly
The U.S., in taking a massive dump on the 3rd world poor, and supporting regimes which targeted opposition, made it so that for many of those folks the only alternative to shitsville was Marxist-Leninist-Socialist regimes.
Kind of a chicken and egg thing here. If the opposition to the current regime was already Marxist-Leninist-Socialist, then US support for the current regime didn't really make it the "only" alternative.
I suspect there are a lot of messy details on just how, in various countries, a bourgeouis/liberal/democratic center was obliterated from both the "right" and the "left", but lets not pretend that one branch of the opposition in many countries wasn't funded by the Soviets and had as part of its revolutionary mission the radicalizing and polarization of politics.
though an article on Che that fails to mention his stint as executioner at La Caba?a prison
This is the NYT you are talking about. They always leave out relevant facts. This is the newspaper that white-washed even Stalin!
The NYT is a piece of shit. Anyone that claims the NYT is a great newspaper is a piece of shit.
[Yawn] ...
I'm a libertarian, but the "Che Hating Obsession" gets old.
Remove the speck from our "own eye" first as the good book says.
- The U.S. allied itself with the brutal Stalin against Nazism. Thus he was "our monster" ... Hitler on the other hand was the "enemy monster".
Foreign policy is very Machiavellian. If he kills for U.S. interests (Pinochet, Marcos, Somoza, The Shah, Trujillo, Batista, Suharto, Mobutu, Saddam (1980-88), Mubarak, Osama Bin Laden during the Soviet Invasion, King Abdullah etc) then he is an important allie who Uncle Sam backs with mine and your tax dollars.
However if he kills against U.S. interests (Allende, Khomenni, Castro, Che, Arbenz, Lumumba, Ben Bella, Franco, Chavez, Ortega, Saddam (1991-2001), Ahmadinejad, Osama Bin Laden post Soveit Invasion etc) then he is an "evil" villian who must be destroyed.
I believe that both Ron Paul (R) and Dennis Kucinich (D) have done a good job of pointing this out. We as Americans should be the ones to demand an end to propping up any brutal tyrants !
"Do you have, like, a profile on some online dating site somewhere I can check out?"
Heh heh. I'm old. It just wouldn't work out.
Foreign policy is very Machiavellian. If he kills for U.S. interests (Pinochet, Marcos, Somoza, The Shah, Trujillo, Batista, Suharto, Mobutu, Saddam (1980-88), Mubarak, Osama Bin Laden during the Soviet Invasion, King Abdullah etc) then he is an important allie who Uncle Sam backs with mine and your tax dollars.
However if he kills against U.S. interests (Allende, Khomenni, Castro, Che, Arbenz, Lumumba, Ben Bella, Franco, Chavez, Ortega, Saddam (1991-2001), Ahmadinejad, Osama Bin Laden post Soveit Invasion etc) then he is an "evil" villian who must be destroyed.
Depends on the interests. I don't mind if the 'interest' at stake is in opposing (say) Soviet expansionism, or Marxist guerilla movements.
Don't really see the problem with using Islamic nutjobs as tools either, as long as we clean up afterwards. We should have gone through and assassinated the lot of them when we were done.
I just wear Che shirts because it scores me hot hippie chicks.
Chillax people
Speaking of "murderers" & "killers" ... maybe 'reason' (oh the irony) could do a report on the CIA trained terrorists like Luis Posada Carriles ("South America's Bin Laden" who blew up Cubana Flight 455 in 1976), Orlando Bosch (his partner in crime), Felix Rodriguez (point man for Oliver North in Iran/Contra, trained central American contra death squads, ordered execution of Che Guevara), Alpha 66, Brigade 2506 etc
all blow up Havana hotel lobbies, strafe Cuban beaches with gun fire, poison Cuban water supplies and crops, and basically run their very own "exile" Hezballah in South Florida while Uncle Sam either looks the other way, or helps them.
Go to Versailles restaurant in Miami & these old cowardly Gusano Assassins will be sitting up front.
All Libertarians should abhor the travel restrictions on U.S. Citizens to Cuba. A damn North Korean is free to fly to Havana, but I can't take a flight there from Tampa.
I would never even visit Cuba (except maybe to get cigars), however I'm disgusted by the fact that supposedly "free" Americans are unable to visit Cuba to see for themselves and make up their own minds.
"Che was the most complete human being of our time, our era's most perfect man."
--- Jean Paul Sartre
Che Guevara is a worldwide hero ...
meanwhile this site is flush with douchebags.