Tuesday Morning Variety Pack
* Matt Labash visits Detroit.
* Patrick Cockburn demystifies Deep Throat.
* Daniel McCarthy reviews the career of a quasi-libertarian senator.
* Yasheng Huang reconsiders the sources of China's economic growth.
* The perils of Godwin's Law.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
cockburn - deepthroat
someone has his mind in the gutters this morning!
That Labash piece took me completely by surprise. Not the sort of thing I ever would have expected to see in the Weekly Standard.
Not the sort of thing I ever would have expected to see in the Weekly Standard.
Labash specializes in those.
Jesse,
The (common) misapplication of Godwin's Law makes that xkcd less funny. This is my favorite.
He could do a sequel where Mike Godwin pops out and explains that his law is descriptive, not prescriptive, thus allowing the Allies to win WW2.
Here's a thought.
The firemen in Detroit should concentrate on preventing the uncontrolled spread of fires, while allowing abandoned eyesores to burn to the ground.
Incidentally, folks can check out Charlie LeDuff's website for several of the articles Labash mentions. It was actually after someone sent me a link to the "Flight of the Dead" story that I began to realize just how much of LeDuff's work I'd read and enjoyed.
Anon
Also, from the McCarthy review:
"He won acquittal for a woman who had shot her husband dead, in full view of witnesses, at a card table."
There is no further context given for this statement. In the context of the article it is clearly meant to be laudatory. But since I read Balko, I immediately thought it was one of those weird logic puzzles, where the answer is he was holding a dog.
Anon