Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

The Shorter John McCain

Jesse Walker | 9.24.2008 3:25 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

I'd rather debate pressing issues behind closed doors with my colleagues than on national TV where voters might see me.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: I'd Rather Lose a Campaign Than Blah Blah Blah

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

PoliticsCampaigns/ElectionsJohn McCain
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (53)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Hogan   17 years ago

    The postponed debate was on foreign policy.

  2. Jesse Walker   17 years ago

    I doubt it would have stayed there, but you're right. Text adjusted accordingly.

  3. Episiarch   17 years ago

    Jesse, you linked to Dave thread as the discussion place, yet posted in this one. Does that make this the shadow thread?

  4. Terry Michael   17 years ago

    Amazing. You fall way behind in the polls (today's WashPost/ABC poll gives Obama a 9 pt national lead), so you demand the rules be changed. Guess McCain is now cruising around in "The Straight Balk Digress"?

  5. Poysun   17 years ago

    Title of the 2008 election:
    Old Man and the Negro. Does America want either?
    Tune in on November 4th to see the results!

  6. Terry   17 years ago

    Terry Michaels you can't trust the WashPost/ABC polls and what rules are be changed?
    When something unexpected happens that is more important then a dual press conference that requires the senators presence then the campagins should be suspended.
    I know this is very difficult for you to understand, actually impossible, as it is for anyone who calls themselves a "libertarian democrat". I suggest schmuck for short.

  7. joshua corning   17 years ago

    McCain made a terrible mistake by doing this....it might be fatal to his election bid.

  8. Mo   17 years ago

    Terry,
    The debate is less important than fixing the crisis, but the Clinton Global Warming thingamajig isn't? He's still going to that.

  9. Terry   17 years ago

    Joshua you want to bet?
    Just the opposite. McCain as in somethings, is right way before the crowd.

    PS I don't like McCain, but he is better then Obama.

  10. Terry   17 years ago

    Mo what are you talking about?

  11. svf   17 years ago

    AP: Obama likely to keep debate as McCain seeks delay

    Barr should be all over this shit... Obama can debate Bob... everyone wins... Bob gets on national TV, Obama helps Bob siphon away McCain's votes...

    I know it's fucking insane to even ponder it, but this year you never know...

  12. Seitz   17 years ago

    McCain made a terrible mistake by doing this....it might be fatal to his election bid.

    I'm curious what Mr. "I don't know much about the economy, the fundamentals of which are strong" thinks he's going to do to solve everything? I don't want that guy anywhere near these negotiations.

  13. henry   17 years ago

    I guess John McChicken is more afraid of Obama than he was of the NV.

    Hey, John--its BUSH who does the waterboarding, not Obama.

    What a fucking joke this clown is turning into. Yes, there just isn't enough hysteria-inducing grandstanding in DC right now on this subject--let's have the McCainiac and Biden there, in full blather.

  14. Episiarch   17 years ago

    as it is for anyone who calls themselves a "libertarian democrat". I suggest schmuck for short

    I was going to go with "douchebag" but yours is shorter.

    Barr should be all over this shit...

    Maybe he will be. Give him a chance.

  15. fishfry   17 years ago

    If Obama's smart, he wins big on this. McCain's announcement plays into his rep as impulsive and hot-headed. And, it also plays right into the fact that Palin is ducking the press like crazy. If Obama is smart he makes both these points, then shows up to the debate by himself. He points out that we have a lot of smart people in Washington dealing with the economic issues; that there must NOT be a rush to a bad bill, but rather a thoughtful process that gets it right. The absence of McCain at the debate will speak volumes.

  16. zoltan   17 years ago

    I wish I could get on the Barr bandwagon and say he'll take advantage of this, but I think too many people will think this is a good idea except Obama supporters who already have their vote locked.

  17. Terry   17 years ago

    "He points out that we have a lot of smart people in Washington dealing with the economic issues;"
    That is debatable if they're but those people aren't senators who are responsible for what the taxpayer money is spent on.
    If Obama doesn't want to take responsibility he should resign.

  18. joshua corning   17 years ago

    Just the opposite. McCain as in somethings, is right way before the crowd.

    After writing 2 paragraphs trying to convince you otherwise I really do not know what Obama can do but follow McCain back to Washington.....

    I guess we will see how this pans out.

  19. Terry Michael   17 years ago

    I probably shouldn't dignify with this reply those of you who engage in name calling in your sophomoric "comments" (e.g. "schmuck" and "douchebag.") But is it too much to ask that you try to make some arguments here rather than engage in ad hominem attacks? It gets really tiresome.

  20. Mo   17 years ago

    Terry

    McCain said he would put politics aside and return to Washington Thursday to focus on the nation's financial problems after addressing former President Clinton's Global Initiative session in New York.

  21. Lost_In_Translation   17 years ago

    If Obama doesn't want to take responsibility he should resign.

    Sorry, but this was the funniest thing I've heard all day.

  22. SIV   17 years ago

    I would have thought the smart thing to do was to show up at the foreign policy debate and keep jacking it to the economy and throw Obama off his
    script. The McCain campaign has been running smart for a while but I don't get this move at all. Would anybody even notice if not for the government panic?

  23. Episiarch   17 years ago

    But is it too much to ask that you try to make some arguments here rather than engage in ad hominem attacks?

    Terry, some of us find your moniker of "libertarian democrat" to be ludicrous and deserving of scorn. Your puff piece on Obama's "positives" was beyond ridiculous, for starters, and was torn to shreds in the comments. You want arguments? Go review that thread.

  24. svf   17 years ago

    The McCain campaign has been running smart for a while but I don't get this move at all.

    Is Russ Verney working for McCain now...?

  25. BDB   17 years ago

    I know what's going on. He's taking political advice from Bob Shrum. Srssly, he's the only guy that suggested this before today.

  26. SIV   17 years ago

    But is it too much to ask that you try to make some arguments here rather than engage in ad hominem attacks? It gets really tiresome.

    "Tool" is shorter than Schmuck or douche bag.

  27. joe   17 years ago

    The McCain campaign has been running smart for a while

    Huh? He's been shitting the bed for a week. First Flailin Palin, and then he falls on his face over the meltdown.

    He's taking political advice from Bob Shrum. Oh please oh please oh please.

  28. Jeff   17 years ago

    The debate was on foreign policy. The first debate was originally on the economy but was moved back because Obama didn't want foreign policy to go last.

    Obama has fooled the nation.

    Obama voted to give a homeowner Hale Demar a felony for protecting his home and his family against a robber because he used a handgun.

    Never before did I think America would elect a marxist like Obama.

    This election is utter madness. The media has shoved this marxist down our throats.

    This marxist who runs ads calling Limbaugh a racist and how Lou Dobbs has doubled hate crimes in America. Hate crimes haven't doubled.

  29. Jeff   17 years ago

    The debate on foreign policy can be delayed until next week.

    McCain said he would go to the debate if it is settled by friday morning.

    Obama is the one who wouldn't go to any townhalls with McCain.

    Obama is the one who has to decamp for three days for the debate.

  30. henry   17 years ago

    "McCain said he would go to the debate if it is settled by friday morning."

    I am guessing you posted this without any sense of irony whatsoever.

  31. joe   17 years ago

    The first debate was originally on the economy but was moved back because Obama didn't want foreign policy to go last.

    Actually, both sides wanted that. McCain thought a foreign policy debate right now could help him stem Obama's momentum, while Obama thought that having the domestic policy debate last would help him by being the freshest one in the voters' minds in November.

    No, the only changes in the debates that have been insisted on by one candidate are this gimmick, and the McCain camp's insistence that Sarah Palin not have to give long answers or have back-and-forths with Joe Biden.

  32. BDB   17 years ago

    Obama has called McCain's bluff. That was ballsy.

    Either McCain walks back his statement, or Obama gets an "empty chair" debate where he has all three networks to himself. For free.

  33. Dave T   17 years ago

    Lou Dobbs has doubled hate crimes in America. Hate crimes haven't doubled.

    But don't be confused, Lou Dobbs is a hateful piece of shit.

  34. joe   17 years ago

    The debate on foreign policy can be delayed until next week.

    But a $700 trillion bailout package for Wall Street has to be passed NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW!!!

  35. joe   17 years ago

    Er, billion.

  36. Don the libertarian Democrat   17 years ago

    Jesse, Too Good!

  37. Lost_In_Translation   17 years ago

    joe,

    I think once hyper inflation hits, the revalued cost of the bailout might be in the T's

  38. BDB   17 years ago

    K LO says Palin should step in!

  39. joshua corning   17 years ago

    But a $700 trillion bailout package for Wall Street has to be passed NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW!!!

    That will be the cost of the bail out in 2028 after the Democrats again fuck up the financial sector.

    Fannie Mae is dead! Long Live Fucky Mae!!!

    Fucky Mae...instead of using tax dollars to create a market for trash subprime loans this time will just create a market for pure poison.

  40. Fluffy   17 years ago

    Right, Jeff. Obama is the Marxist in the campaign, even though McCain is the one who wants the whole world to stop while he goes back to Washington for the express purpose of yelling at other members of Congress until they support throwing 700 billion of the taxpayer's dollars at Goldman Sachs.

    Because that's what he's going to Washington to do. Not to try to "find a solution" or whatever. He explicitly stated that he's returning to Washington because his canvass of the Republican caucus led him to believe the bailout wouldn't pass. That's not acceptable to John McCain, so he wants to play "I'm Hitler and you're Schuschnigg" with the Senate until they do what he wants.

  41. zoltan   17 years ago

    Dave T, you forgot fat.

  42. joshua corning   17 years ago

    If there was no Fannie Mae there would be no market for Sub-prime loans and we would not be in the crisis we are in.

    According to joe the government is the "peoples" government and the government created and in fact now owns Fannie Mae.

    The actions of Fannie Mae has severely harmed Wall Street. Which makes me wonder why Joe is so against the government paying back billions to the businesses that were harmed by the "people"?

    Should not the "people" be held responsible for the harm they cause?

  43. Terry   17 years ago

    "Obama is the Marxist in the campaign, even though McCain is the one who wants the whole world to stop while he goes back to Washington"

    No Fluffy, he is stopping his campaign and suggests Obama do the same so they can do the jobs they are paid to do, that of Senator.
    Understand?
    What kind of name is "Fluffy" for a human being or even a dog for that matter.
    Are you some kind of weirdo?

  44. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ)   17 years ago

    PAY ATTENTION TO MEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

  45. ChrisH   17 years ago

    is it too much to ask that you try to make some arguments here rather than engage in ad hominem attacks?

    Well, they were more like ad nominum attacks...

  46. Mo   17 years ago

    The debate was on foreign policy. The first debate was originally on the economy but was moved back because Obama didn't want foreign policy to go last.

    Actually, the McCain campaign wanted the foreign policy debate to go first. The Obama campaign wanted the economy debate to be last. So they wanted the same thing.

  47. joe   17 years ago

    joshua, you never answered my questions below about S. 190, the Fannie Mae "reform" bill John McCain signed onto, that you claim would have prevented this problem if the Barack Obama hadn't voted against it. So now I'm gong to ask you again:

    joe | September 24, 2008, 1:41pm | #

    joshua,

    Now tell us why requiring Fannie and Freddie to own only securitized mortgages rather than individual mortgages - which is what S190 would have done - would have prevented a financial meltdown caused by securitized mortgages.

    and

    How do you vote against a bill that's killed in committee, when you aren't on that committee?

  48. shecky   17 years ago

    What's the fuss? After McCain fixes the economy on Friday, he'll debate Obama.

  49. joe   17 years ago

    Fucky Mae...instead of using tax dollars to create a market for trash subprime loans this time will just create a market for pure poison.

    Actually, that's exactly what John McCain's "reform" bill proposed to do - forbit Fanny Mae from purchasing mortgages, and requiring them to purchase mortgage-backed securities instead.

    Why does John McCain want to destroy the economy, joshua? Is it because he was getting a kickback from the Fannie Mae lobbyist who's running his campaign?

  50. joe   17 years ago

    I want to beat up joshua some more.

    Mr. Corning, if there wouldn't have been a subprime market but for Fannie and Freddie, why did Bear Stearns and Lehman buy so many subprime loans and their derivatives that they are facing bankruptcy?

    If Fannie Mae was the only reason lenders and loan purchasers felt insulated from the risks of this market, then why did AIG sell so many insurance policies to protect against potential losses in that market that they, too, are facing bankruptcy?

    Here, let me lighten the mood: how is John McCain like a sleazy mortgage broker? They both got rich by fucking people.

  51. GILMORE   17 years ago

    joe,

    you turn this whole story into a cartoon the way you try to simplify the role of what "subprime" has to do with this issue.

    Loosehttp://www.forbes.com/opinions/2008/09/22/crisis-derivatives-financial-oped-cx_bm_0922malkiel.html

  52. joe   17 years ago

    GILMORE,

    Are you fucking kidding me? I am overemphasizing the subprime role?

    Lemme guess - this had been a thread, no wait a series of threads, full of nuance and painfully earnest efforts to take in the full scope and complications of the issue, and then mean ol' joe comes along. Are you fucking kidding me?

    Gee, GILMORE, I'm sorry I didn't live up to the standards set by joshua corning. You know, the guy who made such totally non-cartoonish arguments that I responded to.

  53. GILMORE   17 years ago

    No, joe i didnt mean to just ballbust you

    but calling these series of threads any source of enlightenment is a stretch

    subprime lending was a source of the current problem. but it was started by cheap money (the monetary policy of the US for decades) and government promotion of 'housing for everyone!' incentives for lending, and government rule changing about leverage limits.

    The source of the problem in almost all elements starts with bad, well-intentioned government. So bitching about wall st and short sellers is basically complaining about the side effects

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Autumn Billings | 6.2.2025 5:30 PM

Harvard International Student With a Private Instagram? You Might Not Get a Visa.

Emma Camp | 6.2.2025 4:57 PM

J.D. Vance Wants a Free Market for Crypto. What About Everything Else?

Eric Boehm | 6.2.2025 4:40 PM

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!