Why We're Covering the Conventions … and How You Can Help!
Gentlemen, start your contrariness! Ten days before this week's swoop-down of 15,000 journalists (including a handful of us from reason) onto Denver for the Democratic National Convention, two media harrumphers I frequently agree with, Jack Shafer and Jeff Jarvis, both advocated journalistic boycotts of the proceedings. Said the Buzzmachinist:
The outcome of the conventions is known. There will be no news. Why are these news organizations sending so many staffers there?
Ego.
That's it, pure a[n]d simple: Our man in Denver. Instead of your woman.
Amenned the Pressboxer:
They fight their colleagues for the honor to attend because a political convention is a gas to cover. It's like a vacation, only no spouses! There's free food, plenty of booze, nice hotels, lots of pals in the press and politics dishing gossip, and the assignment is easy to report.
Either Jarvis and Shafer haven't been to a major-party political convention in a while, or they've forgotten what the view's like from the cheap seats, where the vast majority of the 15,000 sit (and where I've witnessed three of the past four crimes against democracy). The only "ego" involved there is that teensy weensy little thing of yours that got crushed on Day 1, under the boot-heel of technology that never works, passes that rarely get you where you need to go, and the dispiriting sight of overstaffed, moneybags news organizations yukking it up while you scramble to actually work. Free food? If you like lukewarm boiled hot dogs, sure. Nice hotels? I've heard of those. Vacation? Only if your idea of leisure involves four hours of sleep a night, free-speech cages, and the existential horrors of watching American politics up close and personal.
Why do it? Aside from the random kicks in learning about Hawaiian independence movements, getting interviewed by Jerry Brown, discovering that the DNC chair is a dot-com weenie with a mind of cheese, and taking photographic evidence of the "Axis of Ass," there is the non-insignificant matter that reason is a political magazine of ideas, with deeply skeptical, independent-skewing readers who have some specific fears about both a John McCain presidency and a Barack Obama restoration. Since the Democratic flock will be collected in one place, it's an excellent week for hunting wabbit. Would a unified Democratic government usher in an era of re-regulation? Does Obama's anti-Iraq War stance indicate bold new foreign policy thinking or just that Darfur is a better target than Baghdad? Will the Dems' de facto advantages on stuff like the drug war, immigration, and anti-anti-gay measures ever translate into actual policy worth a damn? Would an Obama-Biden White House forget about limiting Executive Power the moment they felt it coursing through their veins? These are the questions (and if you have more, Dear Readers, please leave them in the comments, and we'll try to get them answered).
Jarvis and Shafer both claim that C-SPAN is more than enough to handle whatever news there is this week, but that assumes, wrongly, that the news at any given time is limited to whatever's being said from the podium–a concept that's even less accurate about conventions than it is for Congress (where the horse-trading that seals deals happens exclusively off-camera). More importantly, these things are well and truly conventions, huge gatherings of professional practitioners, fans, and journalists who are constantly combining and producing noteworthiness far away from the arena. Here, for example, are four events taking place at 1:30 p.m. today:
Symposium on Philanthropy: A Driving Force for Change with CNN founder Ted Turner, Quiznos founder Rick Schaden, and Google's Larry Brilliant, sponsored by the Democratic National Convention Committee, Boettcher Hall, 950 13th St.
Symposium on Retirement Security with Adams Group CEO Tucker Hart Adams, Center for American Progress' Dr. Christian Weller and Stamford Mayor Daniel Malloy, sponsored by the Democratic National Convention Committee, Ricketson Theatre, 14th and Curtis Sts.
Symposium on Transportation Infrastructure with former Rep. Dick Gephardt (D-Mo.), Gov. Ed Rendell (D-Pa.), Policy Link President Angela Glover Blackwell, Atlanta Mayor Shirley Franklin, and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), sponsored by the Democratic National Convention Committee, Space Theatre, 13th & Curtis Sts.
Immigration Reform and the Next Administration featuring New Democratic Network director of Hispanic programs Andres Ramirez, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), National Council of La Raza President Janet Murguia, and America's Voice executive director Frank Sharry, sponsored by the New Democratic Network, Hilton Gardner Inn, 1400 Welton St.
The stuff off-camera is where party heavyweights talk ideas, reassure swing voters that the candidate doesn't really mean his campaign rhetoric, and/or express frustration that their pet causes are being ignored. Meanwhile, the streets are filled with over-militarized cops, Mumia-loving commies, and as many at 200,000 funny-looking people. And yes, sometimes being inside for the speeches can be a more profound experience than watching on the boob tube back home.
So watch this space this week and next for reportage, hijinks, and some peeks behind the curtain of the political sausage factory. Let the games begin!
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Pictures, Matt. Lots and lots of pictures, please.
I'm dressing up like Calvin Coolidge this year! My costume is totally kawai!
Don't we already know the answers to these questions? If we didn't, why would we expect to learn the truth by asking politicians and their cohorts?
I can't really muster up enough feeling to care. I am resigned to getting screwed no matter who wins this election.
I'd vote for Silent Cal any day.
well it should be interesting, i mean 2 nights of the Clinton klan and folk from MICH and FLA
I can't really muster up enough feeling to care. I am resigned to getting screwed no matter who wins this election.
well it should be interesting, i mean 2 nights of the Clinton klan and folk from MICH and FLA
It will be very interesting to see if Bill 'n' Hill have made the calculation that the best way to preserve their core support for the Presidency is to monkeywrench Obama's convention, a little. Give the faithful something to be pissed off about/remember - the Stolen Nomination of '08, kinda like the Stolen Election of '00.
By agreeing to a roll call, the Obamatrons have set the table for a fight over MI and FL. Has it been resolved yet whether they will be seated? How much of a vote they get? I haven't heard anything.
There's a great set of DNCC (and RNCC) links on USA Media Guide. They have links to the official sites, the protest sites, local Denver media coverage, where to watch them online, and links to blogs reporting from them.
The link is http://www.USAMediaGuide.com
Just heard on NPR that MI and FL will be seated in full, but that it won't make a difference in the vote.
there is the non-insignificant matter that reason is a political magazine of ideas, with deeply skeptical, independent-skewing readers who have some specific fears about both a John McCain presidency and a Barack Obama restoration.
And there's tinker's damn we can do about either.
Will the Dems' de facto advantages on stuff like the drug war, immigration, and anti-anti-gay measures ever translate into actual policy worth a damn?
No. Next question?
Matt, you've already answered your own "why" question: it's a circle-jerk for policy wonks and politics geeks, but a big, honking yawner for the other 99.99% of us.
It's an infomercial with a freak show on the side. Have fun!
"Just heard on NPR that MI and FL will be seated in full, but that it won't make a difference in the vote."
That, in a nutshell, summarizes the duopoly's approach to voting rights. Recognize voting rights once we're sure those votes won't makw a difference.
I just found this message subject in my spam filter:
"Jamie Lynn: Britney impregnated me with Ron Paul's sperm"
Not really on point, but I just had to share.
What happens when a nation is gripped by the most important election it has ever seen?.
What ostentatious displays can you expect when a self-entitled, egomaniacal politician with a gift for lofty rhetoric finally receives his due.
What does it look like when the number one DNC dog-and-pony show reaches its critical mass.
Well, it looks like this.
Just heard on NPR that MI and FL will be seated in full, but that it won't make a difference in the vote.
I think they've just tossed out the window their ability to enforce rules on when primaries are held. If they didn't enforce the rules this time around, it will be very hard to enforce them next time.
I've got my fingers crossed for some mayhem. Go Hillary!
Alas, the Hip Hop mayor is not going to make it. It would have been fun watching Obama avoiding him like toxic waste.
Jesus H. Christ, Matt, the link in this line is precisely why you're one of my favorite political journos.
Stop it, Matt, every line is a priceless gem.