Why Would Any President Want A Second Term?

Re-election is a fancy word for "ensuing failure"


Editor's Note: Steve Chapman is on vacation. The following column was originally published in April 2004.

Calvin Coolidge was probably not the smartest president this country has ever had, but he once composed a statement that in retrospect can only be described as brilliant: "I do not choose to run for president in 1928." If he had been re-elected, he would have presided over the Crash of 1929, to his eternal discredit. Instead, the shantytowns of jobless people that sprung up during the Great Depression were called, in honor of his unlucky successor, Hoovervilles.

But presidents refuse to learn from Coolidge's example. About the only thing that can prevent a president from running for re-election is the certainty of losing. George W. Bush was the latest to put in his bid for a second term, even though making a second term successful is about as easy as making a souffle rise twice.

The thinking among politicians and historians is that two terms are required to vault a chief executive from the ranks of the good presidents to the ranks of the greats. But re-election is also a good way to go from good to terrible. Few presidents have enhanced their stature in their second term, and many have blown their reputations to bits.

Bill Clinton would be remembered with far less controversy had he stepped down in 1996, with the nation at peace, the economy healthy and the federal budget deficit well on the way to erasure. Instead, he stuck around for the pleasure of having his sex life dissected in public and becoming the second president ever to be impeached.

Disgrace is a recurring theme of second terms. Ronald Reagan achieved the bulk of his economic program and defense buildup in his first four years, leaving much of his remaining time for the Iran-contra scandal—which involved the secret sale of weapons to Iran, with the proceeds going to rebels fighting the Marxist government of Nicaragua.

Richard Nixon, of course, had Watergate—which erupted because his aides mounted a break-in at the Democratic National Committee office in a crazed effort to ensure his, yes, re-election. He found that winning a second term doesn't guarantee you'll complete it.

But even presidents who don't embarrass themselves rarely do much to distinguish themselves, either. Dwight Eisenhower's first term gave him the opportunity to end the Korean War. His second term allowed him to enjoy a recession, the launch of the Soviet satellite Sputnik and a scandal involving his chief of staff.

Franklin Roosevelt is remembered as a great president today not so much because of what he accomplished in his second term, which featured an economic downturn and his Court-packing debacle, but what he accomplished in his third and fourth—reviving the economy and winning World War II. But presidents may no longer be elected to more than two terms.

Anyone presuming to hang around for that long can expect voter affection to cool. As presidential historian Richard Norton Smith asks, "How many TV sitcoms last eight years?" When someone invades your living room for nearly 3,000 days in a row, you're likely to forget why you ever liked him, assuming you're one of those who did like him.

Long-serving presidents face other traps. One is that they rarely have any particular vision for their second term. They ask to be re-elected mainly to complete the goals they've already begun, which often begin to look tired and irrelevant after five or six years.

That contributes to another obstacle, in the form of Congress. Midterm elections in the second term generally bring big losses for the incumbent president's party, which means the final two years are often devoted to fruitless bickering between the executive and legislative branches.

Meanwhile, notes Brookings Institution scholar Stephen Hess, presidents find that most of the trusted aides they brought to Washington are gone or on their way out. At Cabinet and White House meetings, says Hess, "They look around and they ask, 'Who are these people?'" Those few who stay may be mentally and physically exhausted long before they're done, and their boss may end up phoning it in as well.

There's something to be said for leaving too early rather than too late. But it's a rare president who has the wisdom of stripper Gypsy Rose Lee's mother in the musical "Gypsy." Her advice to her daughter: "Make them beg for more—and then don't give it to them."


NEXT: You've Got an Old-Fashioned Idea Copyright Is Something That Lasts Forever

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I thought Bush was forced to take the second term because no other politician wanted to clean up Bush’s mess.

    I didn’t understand why a democrat would want to run in 2004

  2. Why Would Any President Want A Second Term?

    For the same reason they got to their position in the first place – ego.

  3. Maybe Steve is seeing things through those “reality tinted” glasses that Bush never wears.

  4. Under what definition is this “new”?

  5. Limit presidents to one 6-year term.

  6. Also, as I recall, three of the four presidential assassinations were in the second term.

  7. There was no one more surprised than GWB when he won that election. When he saw the announcement on the WH teevee, the shocked (maybe even frightened) look on his face was priceless.

    Same type stooges, different year.

    I hate them all with the white hot intensity of a thousand burning suns.

  8. Gypsy Rose Lee’s mother also told her that everything is coming up roses, daffodils, sunshine, Santa Claus, bright lights and lollipops. That everything’s coming up roses for the mom and her.

    I didn’t understand why a democrat would want to run in 2004
    I understand it, only second tier people and wet blankets where stupid enough to win. Could you picture anyone of a higher caliber then Kerry actually getting the nomination?

  9. confederate constitution,
    Limit the president to a single four-year term.

  10. Despite the iran-contra, you can argue that Reagan’s 2nd term was one of the more successful as those things go.

    The real legacy building parts of his presidency – the tax reform of ’86 and the beginning of the (more or less) peaceful dissolution of the Soviet Union – were entirely creatures of his second term. And as opposed to Clinton, for instance, he did get a successor from his own party elected rather easily.

  11. Also, as I recall, three of the four presidential assassinations were in the second term.

    Two, actually. Lincoln and McKinley were in their second term (both in the first year of it), while Kennedy and Garfield were in the first term (and Garfield in the first few months of his first term). Of the four, Kennedy was the furthest from the previous election (almost exactly 3 years).

    RFK was, if you will, in his zeroth term when assassinated.

    The assassination attempts against Ford and Reagan were in their first terms, whereas the attempt by Puerto Rican nationalists against Truman was in his second.

    So it’s about an even split, neglecting the statistical effect of the obvious bias: there are more presidents who served a first term than served a second term. Also, presidents who served a first term may still be assassinated in their second, whereas the obverse is physically impossible (unless their opponent is John Ashcroft).

  12. I agree with confederate constition. The President should have only one six-year term, period. To me, six years is better than just four because this will allow at least some of the President’s programs to be more firmly implimented, and can be better evaluated. To counter the arguement that one six-year term would be instantly become a “Lame-Duck” term I suggest another Constitusional amendment giving the President the “Line-item veto”. I think this would be the best way to go.

  13. Tim Washburn,
    I don’t really want time for the president’s programs to be firmly implemented. President Bush has had plenty of time to implement his programs, mostly in foreign policy, and I would personally like for those policies not to have been so firmly implemented. As for the line-item veto, I am against it, mainly because it could go one of two ways: 1. It is meaningless because Congress condenses all provisions into a bill into one superprovision that the presidents signs or vetoes. 2. More likely is that the president claims the right to endlessly modify a law, taking it apart and parsing it until it is entirely unlike the bill Congress sent. This would be a good thing in some cases, but I shudder to think how most presidents would use such a power.

  14. Elvis never did encores. Many could benefit from his example…

  15. and the beginning of the (more or less) peaceful dissolution of the Soviet Union

    The dissolution of a strong eastern block was the start of the erosion of our own civil liberties. While the “enemy” was tyrannically restricting freedoms of speech and acts, no western government would or could behave similarly with their own peoples.

  16. Auf der Liste der [url = http://www.blackfridaynikech.com/%5D Nike Free [/ url] rechts dieser Moment, der Nike Free Hyper TR. Diese spezifische Casino Schuh ist eigentlich, dass moderne, da sie einfach kommen und zus?tzlich noch ein compenent des Nike “Free” Serie zu sein, ist es wirklich sicher zu geben. Wir haben dieses spezielle wenig Auswertung auf L?nge lesen Sie in diesem Boot geschrieben. In diesem Artikel k?nnen die Zuschauer zeigen, was macht dieses Casino Schuh so cool. Das ist der gro?e Start einige Leute wollen in diesem Casino Schuh zusammen mit der Notwendigkeit, um mehr zu bekommen.
    Nachdem ich das erste Mal erhalten die [url = http://www.blackfridaynikech.com/%5D Nike Free Run [/ url] Bildung Boot, waren meine ersten Gedanken, dass diese Schuhe sehen ziemlich weit drau?en zusammen mit attraktiv. Gesamtkonzeption, das Design ist neben der Farbauswahl ist wirklich erstklassig. Sie werden schien wirklich gut mit jedem E-Mail zog sie mit; Ich muss sagen, ich war fr?her sehr erfreut.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.