Warrior and Antiwarrior in Detailed Debate
Scott Horton of Antiwar.com and an anonymous Marine non-com officer engaged in a long, detailed, and surprisingly polite exchange of e-mail debates on American foreign policy. The correspondence pulls together the sensible sides of the debate over U.S. policy in the Middle East very well (and at great length), and is worth reading in full.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Wow... I look forward to reading the exchange after work (or, shall I say, after the Iowa caucus). Go Paul!
The correspondence pulls together the sensible sides of the debate over U.S. policy in the Middle East very well .
Well, we gave it a shot here at H&R, but it was a little too "open source." I look forward to reading it.
Excellent and respectful discourse. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Screw respectful...it actually outlines a libertarian view of the war without regurgitating old lefty arguments. A truly excellent...and sadly rare piece of work.
Let that exchange be a lesson to all of ya that like to froth at the mouth and growl and snap and snipe at those you disagree with, you dumbfucks.