Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Bad Prosecutors

Radley Balko | 12.31.2007 9:37 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Over at The Agitator, cast your vote for 2007's worst prosecutor of the year.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Weigel on the Radio

Radley Balko is a journalist at The Washington Post.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Elemenope   18 years ago

    They're all rotten, but Allgood got my vote because his sloppiness and stubbornness (and complete lack of concern for justice) nearly killed people. I don't understand the thinking behind a person wanting to block evidence that may exonerate an innocent person (or definitively condemn a guilty one). It's a person's life, after all.

  2. tarran   18 years ago

    I was all set to vote for Mary Beth Buchanan, then I read the case against Forrest Allgood.

    He 'wins' by a mile. Hey, if you are going to bear false witness, you might as well do it in a manner that leads to murder. That way you can violate two commandments at once!

  3. prolefeed   18 years ago

    What's worse, Andringas further acknowledged to NY Times columnist John Tierney that the 25-year sentence was harsh, but that "Paey was to blame" for refusing a plea bargain. In other words, Andringas allowed Paey to receive a sentence Andringas himself believes Paey didn't deserve because Paey insisted on his constitutional right to a jury trial.

    Let's try and separate this statement from the egregious case being discussed, Radley. If it was for a real crime instead of the bogus case under discussion, for example someone accused of murder, would you have the prosecutor offer a plea bargain (say, 25-to-life), and if that plea bargain was turned down, put the hammer down and try the suspect on charges carrying a maximum sentence of 25-to-life? Gee, I wonder how many suspects would say, "I better take the sure conviction, rather than risk going to trial and getting a sentence that, in the worst case scenario, was identical to the plea bargain offered?"

    The whole frickin' point of a plea bargain is to offer a lesser sentence in exchange for forgoing a jury trial for a much stiffer charge. Are you really arguing that we should do away with plea bargains?

  4. Radley Balko   18 years ago

    I think they need some serious reform.

    They're prone to overcharging, and overburdened public defenders sometimes pressure their clients into accepting pleas they may not deserve.

    When you combine them with mandatory minimums, as in Paey's case, they become especially problematic. Even if you're innocent, it's awfully tempting to take a plea for something you didn't do than risk 25 years to life.

    Bit more on plea bargaining here:

    http://www.theagitator.com/2006/03/28/the-perils-of-plea-bargaining/

  5. Russ 2000   18 years ago

    Let's try and separate this statement from the egregious case being discussed...

    WTF? Justice is supposed to be blind, not ignorant.

  6. JW   18 years ago

    Radley--You need an "all of the above." Trying to decide which is the bigger scumbag among these 5 is like debating how much blacker the cover of Smell the Glove could be.

  7. de stijl   18 years ago

    The others made me outraged, but Allgood made me sick.

  8. Aresen   18 years ago

    Radley

    We want to see the final result of the poll.

    (Allgood had a big lead when I looked.)

  9. prolefeed   18 years ago

    Radley, how would you propose reforming plea-bargaining? The excessive sentences available are a product of legislators who want to play "tough on crime" to a constituency that doesn't understand the consequences of having excessive penalties. I've served as a legislative assistant, and seen legislators propose making relatively minor littering a felony.

    The prolbem isn't plea-bargaining itself -- IIRC, I read an article explaining how doing away with or limiting the scope of plea-bargaining would result in stiffer average sentences, which I doubt is the intended consequence of the "reforms" you would like.

    Fix the actual problem -- renegade prosecutors and legislators (and voters who tolerate the above).

  10. LarryA   18 years ago

    Radley, how would you propose reforming plea-bargaining?

    The main reason plea bargaining is necessary is the number of cases filed. So start off by rescending about 80% of the laws people can violate, starting with all the consensual "crimes." End the war on drugs, laws against consenting sexual behavior, gambling, and so forth.

    That would be a start.

  11. Brandybuck   18 years ago

    It sounds like these prosecutors all have the obstinancy mutant gene.

  12. Ayn_Randian   18 years ago

    Hmmm..

    Virginia - South
    Mississippi - South
    Florida - South (sort of)
    Georgia - South

    Maybe I'm pulling a correlation/causation error here...but I don't think so. Is it a function of the Bible Belt, bad schools or both?

  13. Elemenope   18 years ago

    "Distrust all in whom the urge to punish is powerful."

    Yep, good rule.

  14. patrick   18 years ago

    If only all the presidential candidates were as deserving of my vote.

  15. Adam W.   18 years ago

    Fuck 'em all. Allgood only because of the death penalty factor.

  16. Milo   18 years ago

    Sympathy vote for Nifong. Bad, but not quite bad enough to reach the top. Which is, ultimately, pretty sad in and of itself.

  17. Seamus   18 years ago

    Hmmm..

    Virginia - South
    Mississippi - South
    Florida - South (sort of)
    Georgia - South

    Maybe I'm pulling a correlation/causation error here...but I don't think so. Is it a function of the Bible Belt, bad schools or both?

    Fairfax and Prince William counties are no longer part of the South in any meaningful sense. And Fairfax County's public schools are reputedly among the best in the country.

  18. Thomas Paine\'s Goiter   18 years ago

    While they are all evil people, Allgood deserves to die in the most painful way that a human can die.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump Says the Courts Have No Business Questioning His Dubious Definition of 'Alien Enemies'

Jacob Sullum | 7.1.2025 5:40 PM

Medicaid Work Requirements Are a Short-Term Fix to a Long-Term Problem

Tosin Akintola | 7.1.2025 4:18 PM

The U.S. Is Closing Every Door on Afghan Allies

Beth Bailey | 7.1.2025 4:00 PM

Trump's Travel Ban Will Not Make Americans Safer

Benjamin Powell | 7.1.2025 3:15 PM

California Enacts Sweeping Exemption to Development-Killing Environmental Law

Christian Britschgi | 7.1.2025 1:10 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!