Rats Off to Ya!
Via Fark, the New Jersey Supreme Court is looking at the case of union members who displayed a big black plastic rat at a protest and, as it happened, broke the law.
The super-sized rat — on its hind legs and bearing fangs — had been blown up and situated at a 2005 labor event until police ticketed the senior union official onsite for violating a local sign law.
The event, at Gold's Gym in Lawrence, was staged by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) to protest low wages being paid to electricians by an out-of-area contractor. The rat is a symbol used by organized labor to signal a labor dispute or the use of nonunion workers.
The labor official, Wayne DeAngelo, was fined $100 plus $33 court costs for violating a Lawrence Township ordinance preventing the display of the large, rat-shaped balloon.
The law bans banners, streamers and inflatable signs, except those announcing grand openings.
This isn't such a weird story: Those inflatable rats are everywhere. Union protestors prop one up in downtown D.C. every couple of weeks, shaming some shop or another. Lawrence's law is a pretty minor quality-of-life measure (look at that tiny fine), but that doesn't mean it's constitutional.
Headline explained here (kind of).
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Since when is $100 bucks tiny?
"Since when is $100 bucks tiny?"
When it's the IBEW paying the bills.
Are wacky waving inflatable arm flailing tube men exempt?
They're not really inflatable in that they're meant to leak in order to cause the wacky arm waving motion. They're not banners or streamers. And they're totally adorable.
I'm not saying I like the ban, but I wonder if the cops were worried that the rat symbol could be an incitement to violence against non-union workers. At least when I lived in Philly a few years ago, the IBEW was notorious for violence. The head of the local aspires to be mayor of Philly (shudder) and basically already runs the town already.
Holy Crap! I just saw two giant freaking inflatable rats the other day at a union protest - one was 15ft tall. Craziest thing I've seen in a long time (and I live in Philly, so that says something).
Who would have thought there'd be a business for renting out giant inflatable rats?
jbd -
Ahh.. you'd be refering to Dougherty.
Scary dude.
Well, lots of people find all sorts of ways to claim that "commercial speech" shouldn't be protected by the 1st Amendment when it's a business doing the speaking. So why should this be any different?
If "Buy Bob's Rugs for $100" isn't protected speech, then "Pay Me More Money To Be An Electrician" shouldn't be protected speech, either. It's an economic message the same way advertisting is.
What happens if you use an inflatable gimp?
Woohoo! A chance for libertarians to say something in defense of unions.
Giant plastic rats are clearly a form of free speech, and this libertarian is outraged!
tk: Yes, indeed, I'm talking about Johnny Dock. The Philly Inquirer runs articles about him every now and then, which you can tell have been carefully vetted by newspaper lawyers so that the word "mafia" is implied but never actually stated. (A libel suit is probably the least of the risks they face.)
I was once shanghai'ed into going to a fundraiser for his brother, who was running for judge. After a two minute conversation, I seriously wondered how the guy could have ever passed a literacy test, let alone a bar exam. But with Johnny's backing, he now graces the Philadelphia bench.
Gotta love Philly politics. It's just so over-the-top, I miss it.
I was a scab when I was in college. Admit it- you're shocked.
If the IBEW can put up a rat, can the business owner put up a pirate?
Woohoo! A chance for libertarians to say something in defense of unions.
Giant plastic rats are clearly a form of free speech, and this libertarian is outraged!
I won't say outraged, but these stupid sign ordinances piss me off. In Livonia, MI it took months and, Odin only knows how many, dollars, to resolve whether a Big Boy statue, violated a sign ordinance. Jeez.
Giant plastic rats are clearly a form of free speech
In the libertarian world, what isn't free speech? In other words, is all behavior a form of protected speech? It seems to be.
Constipation isn't free speech.
Tim and Eric are awesome.
Constipation isn't free speech.
No, but the resolution of said condition is.
Especially when you do it on the steps of a capitol building.
Technically, we're not defending unions. We're defending giant, inflatable rats.
Declaring constipation is.
Just because it says that in the title doesn't make it true.
Franklin Harris, Thanks. Made my day.
In the libertarian world, what isn't free speech?
Burning someone in Effigy. [A small town outside of Springfield.]
Burning someone in effigy, though, is permitted.
I'm waiting for a business owner to put up a big inflatable rat-trap.
Nothing that a good game of sand sphere can't fix.
Woohoo! A chance for libertarians to say something in defense of unions.
Giant plastic rats are clearly a form of free speech, and this libertarian is outraged!
Unions vs Government - Reason will side with unions
Unions vs Corporations - Reason will side with corporations
Corporations vs Government - Reason will side with corporations
Unions *ARE* corporations, so your generalization is a little bit off.
You're right! If Reason would just change it so Government crushes Corporations, lil' Reason readers could play "Government, Unions, Corporations" in schoolyards across the country.
I bet the non-union workers were getting about $20 an hour too. Unions are dying fast because they demand the lifeblood of business. I say let them go or let them get with the program. People work for less than what they demand, without the headache of slacking ass workers that are protected form being terminated among other things.
About the violence, I have seen some really terrible things happen at strikes over the years. Violence is not an option. Strike violence should automatically turn into a decertification emposed by the NLRB.
I think the ban will pass consitutiontal muster (with the possible exception of the "Grand Opening" exemption) since it's pretty content-neutral, but I still think it's an inappropriate law. You should be able to put up whatever giant inflatable crap you want as long as it isn't damaging anything or obstructing anybody.
Ah, Mike, your logic's off. We would need to have Government trump Unions for a balanced game. Otherwise you could throw Unions all the time and either 1) force Government or Corporations into compliance or 2) result in an endless stalemate.
Strangely, Detroit comes to mind...
Dan T.'s rules were a little confusing because he stated the trumping relationship backwards in one case. If you normalize, he had:
Corporations trump Government
Corporations trump Unions
Unions trump Government
My fix is:
Government trumps Corporations (this rule changed)
Corporations trump Unions
Unions trump Government
Of course, it wouldn't really be a proper Reason Rochambeau unless it also included "Damned Dirty Hippies" as a possible throw.
What about an inflatable woman? Not that I've got one...
JBinMo -
A Giant inflatable woman? Cool...
I say the contractor should hire a giant inflatable cat.
They have the right to display giant inflatable rats all they want as far as I'm concerned, but I've never understood the hostility against "scabs" that unions have. It's quite counterproductive.
Nasty tactics against non-union workers is something that's also gone hand in hand with the racism in American organized labor, and leftists tend to get evasive or simply dismiss it as capitalist propaganda when you bring it up.
"Rats Off To Ya...."
Tom Goes the The Mayor?
Unions *ARE* corporations
Sorry, Rex Rhino, 'fraid not. Corporations are profit-seeking exploiters of the ignorant. Unions, as you know, are above such petty concerns; organized solely for the benefit of the public good and the defense of the lil' guy.
Grand Opening: Rat 4 Sale. Make an Offer!
Obviously unions suppress entrepreneurial talent.
You should be able to put up whatever giant inflatable crap you want as long as it isn't damaging anything or obstructing anybody.
I used to live in the neighborhood of a Ford dealer who consistently displayed a giant inflated something, usually seasonally related, on the roof of his showroom. Silly me, I thought it was cool.
...the racism in American organized labor, ...
Shhh! That's a secret of the left. Kind of like the retarded step-brother in the attic.