Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Hit or Myth

David Weigel | 9.5.2007 8:12 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Not as obvious and "duh!"-inspiring as that "hot women are hot" study, but this report on how myth debunkers actually reinforce myths isn't too surprising.

Experiments by Ruth Mayo, a cognitive social psychologist at Hebrew University in Jerusalem, also found that for a substantial chunk of people, the "negation tag" of a denial falls off with time. Mayo's findings were published in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology in 2004.

"If someone says, 'I did not harass her,' I associate the idea of harassment with this person," said Mayo, explaining why people who are accused of something but are later proved innocent find their reputations remain tarnished. "Even if he is innocent, this is what is activated when I hear this person's name again.

"If you think 9/11 and Iraq, this is your association, this is what comes in your mind," she added. "Even if you say it is not true, you will eventually have this connection with Saddam Hussein and 9/11."

This is basic "don't think of an elephant" stuff, and it's a tough impulse to overcome if you're making a political argument. (Ask Larry "I have never been gay" Craig.) The implications for government-provided guides, manuals, and the like are a little more interesting. You can tell a politician not to say "Saddam Hussein didn't attack the United States" but how do you tell the people designing CDC brochures (the example at the start of this piece) that by mentioning popular myths in their warnings, they're going to make a big chunk of brochure readers confused about what was myth and what wasn't?

Jesse Walker on George Lakoff and "don't think of an elephant" logic here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: America's Taliban-Support Program

David Weigel is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (30)

Latest

With Cigarette Taxes Sky High, More New Yorkers Than Ever Turn to the Black Market

J.D. Tuccille | 9.17.2025 7:00 AM

Brickbat: Sunflower Showdown

Charles Oliver | 9.17.2025 4:00 AM

Trump Has a Habit of Asserting Broad, Unreviewable Authority

Jacob Sullum | 9.17.2025 12:01 AM

Brendan Carr and Ted Cruz Don't Think Charlie Kirk's Murder Justifies Speech Restrictions

Jacob Sullum | 9.16.2025 5:35 PM

The Perverse Incentives for Snitch-Tagging Teachers Who Criticized Charlie Kirk

Christian Britschgi | 9.16.2025 4:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300