Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

FCC Off

Jesse Walker | 1.19.2007 1:58 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Jack Shafer gives a concise summary of the case for scrapping the Federal Communications Commission.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Rise of Stem Cell Research

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

PolicyTelecommunications Policy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (15)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. J sub D   19 years ago

    God. I hate to agree with Slate. But on this, I do.

  2. Warren   19 years ago

    When was the last three-letter chunk of government to be decommissioned?

  3. ed   19 years ago

    WPA

  4. de stijl   19 years ago

    CCC

  5. Madpad   19 years ago

    If we get rid of the FCC, who'll keep T.V. stations from letting Grammy winners say "fuck?"

    I hate to agree with Slate.

    I used to think of Slate as a (I hate to use this moniker) 'liberal' publication, but they're actually usually contrarian, quite often anti-authoritarian and often free-market. Some of the better writing out there on prominent issues.

    I read them just to get their oddball take on stuff.

  6. Warren   19 years ago

    CCC?

    You mean the Chattanooga City Council no longer convenes?

  7. de stijl   19 years ago

    Civilian Conservation Corps

  8. JW   19 years ago

    CAB

    Shafer's premise makes far, far too much sense and thus, will never fly inside the beltway.

  9. Chris S.   19 years ago

    C-O-N-S-T-I-T-U-T-I-O-N

    Oh wait, that's 12 letters. Does that count four times?

  10. Larry A   19 years ago

    Sorry, that was not "a concise summary of the case for scrapping the Federal Communications Commission."

    Concise would be "government regulation sucks."

  11. biologist   19 years ago

    Slate has actually contained a lot of libertarian, dare I say even Reasonesque fare lately.

  12. J sub D   19 years ago

    Slate has actually contained a lot of libertarian, dare I say even Reasonesque fare lately.

    I guess I'll have to start visiting Slate. Perhaps, first impressions are not always accurate.

  13. biologist   19 years ago

    J sub D: some examples that reminded me of reading Hit and Run:

    Legalize It: How to solve Afghanistan's drug problem.

    More Nicotine Madness: Harvard School of Public Health weighs in.

  14. citizengnat   19 years ago

    FCC Off

    we need to put that on t-shirts

  15. kevrob   19 years ago

    The ICC (Inrerstate Commerce Commission) has gone bye-bye. Some of its functions survive in the Surface Transportation Board.

    I'm all for ditching the FCC. We might also have more newspapers in the U.S. if the ban on cross-ownership of broadcast stations and papers in the same market were ended. I live in a 1-daily town, where the outfit that publishes the paper owns an AM and an FM and a VHF NBC-TV affiliate. They used to publish two papers, one bought from Hearst, which was going to fold it, otherwise. Their broadcast competitors can own multiple stations, but if any of them started a newspaper, or bought a suburban daily and expanded it to cover the whole metro area, the Justice Dept. would pitch an antitrust fit. That's just nuts. The antitrust rules themselves maintain the newspaper monopoly!

    Kevin

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

James Comey Says His Grudge-Driven Prosecution Is Unconstitutional Retaliation for His Criticism of Trump

Jacob Sullum | 10.31.2025 6:00 PM

They Face $1 Million in Fines—for Someone Else's Code Violations

Billy Binion | 10.31.2025 5:31 PM

iRobot Faces Bankruptcy After Elizabeth Warren Helped Kill $1.65 Billion Amazon Merger

Joe Lancaster | 10.31.2025 3:35 PM

How Opioid Settlement Money Turned Into a $600K Party Fund

Mariana Trujillo and Layal Bou Harfouch | 10.31.2025 1:46 PM

Trump's National Guard Plan Edges the U.S. Closer to a Permanent Federal Police Force

Jacob R. Swartz | 10.31.2025 12:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300