Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

What's Left in Sweden?

Nick Gillespie | 9.18.2006 8:34 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Sweden's centre-right opposition secured a narrow victory in yesterday's general election, ending 12 years of rule by the Social Democrats, who have governed for 65 of the last 74 years.

Fredrik Reinfeldt, the next prime minister, declared victory shortly before 11pm after a nail-biting finish which gave his four-party Alliance for Sweden a wafer-thin parliamentary majority.

His group was on course to win 178 seats in the 349-seat parliament - seven ahead of the Social Democrats and its allies on the left. With 99.7% of Sweden's districts counted, Mr Reinfeldt's alliance led with 48.1%, compared with 46.2% for the left. "The Swedish people have voted in an alliance government," Mr Reinfeldt told cheering, flag-waving supporters….

The loss for the Social Democrats, who have held office since 1994, represents a big political shift for Sweden, which is normally wary of the centre right. The Social Democrats, who won around 35.3% of the vote - their worst share since 1914 - are seen to embody Sweden's "social model" which is praised across Europe for allowing strong economic growth while providing generous cradle-to-grave benefits.

More here.

For a great history of the Swedish welfare state--and a prescient tale of its decline--read Johan Norberg's excellent recent essay in the National Interest, in which he points out, among other things, that Sweden's total tax burden as a percentage of GDP in 1950 was less that of the United States and that the Swedish-model welfare state didn't really get cranked up until the 1970s.

Reason interviewed Norberg a few years back, focusing on his book In Defense of Global Capitalism. Read the Q&A here.

And check out blog and commentary by Johnny Munkhammar, a mainstay at the Swedish free-market think tank, Timbro.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: "Satanists battle Christians in northeastern state"

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (11)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Stockholmian   19 years ago

    Victory o/

    Sure, the Moderates have moved slightly towards the center but it still felt a lot better to to go to work today knowing that the Social Democrats and their communist party lapdogs won't rule for another four years.

  2. joe   19 years ago

    'Mr Reinfeldt, whose party suffered a crushing defeat at the last election in 2002 after pledging tax cuts of ?9.4bn, carefully toned down his message to reassure the electorate that the "social model" would be safe in his hands. Voters, who believe the model needs to be reformed but not dismantled, were encouraged by more modest tax cuts of ?3.2bn over two years which would mainly be targeted at low-paid workers. The cuts would be paid for by reducing unemployment benefit from 80% of previous income to 65%...

    The election was watched closely across Europe because many leaders have hailed the "social model" as an example for the rest of the EU. Politicians including the German chancellor, Angela Merkel - who has said that Sweden shows that changes can be introduced without cutting off generous state provision - will be relieved that Mr Reinfeldt is not planning to take the axe to the "social model".'

    It's always good when a party comparable to our own Democratic Party comes to power.

  3. Mustafa Shag   19 years ago

    Yes, let's spin a center-right victory in Europe into good news for the American Democrats.

    [cue dixieland jazz]

    "Happy Days Are Here Again..."

  4. Mustafa Shag   19 years ago

    Yes, let's spin a center-right victory in Europe into good news for the American Democrats.

    [cue dixieland jazz]

    "Happy Days are Here Again..."

  5. kohlrabi   19 years ago

    OMG, Joe, you're tireless!

  6. Eric II   19 years ago

    Kinda OT, but funny: A Swedish gang fight, or what passes for one. Apparently sponsored by L.L. Bean.

  7. wsdave   19 years ago

    We got a rumble in Brighton tonight!!!

  8. R C Dean   19 years ago

    joe, could you point out for me the Democratic proposals to cut back the welfare state and reduce taxes?

    Last I saw, the Dems were plumping for higher taxes and a bigger welfare state.

  9. Gilbert Martin   19 years ago

    Well the Dems are for getting rid of the "tax cuts for the rich".

    I expect many of them consider that to be cutting welfare, since in their convoluted minds allowing "the rich" to keep more of their own money actually constitutes the government "giving" them a handout.

  10. Rick Barton   19 years ago

    joe:

    ?modest tax cuts of ?3.2bn over two years which would mainly be targeted at low-paid workers. The cuts would be paid for by reducing unemployment benefit from 80% of previous income to 65%...

    Sounds like a step in the direction of a freer and more prosperous Sweden.

    It's always good when a party comparable to our own Democratic Party comes to power.

    joe, when do we ever se the Dems advocating tax cuts to be paid for with budget cuts? When the Dems advocate budget cuts, it's to spend the money somewhere else. Can you use your pull with the Dem folks to fix this bad habit?

  11. Rex Rhino   19 years ago

    Actually, the Bush's modest plan to allow private investment of part of social security payments was virtually identical to the plan proposed by the Social Democrats in Sweden. It was condemned as being "right wing" by the U.S. Democrats.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Police Blew Up This Innocent Woman's House and Left Her With the Bill. A Judge Says She's Owed $60,000.

Billy Binion | 6.6.2025 1:51 PM

As Trump Threatens Columbia's Accreditation, the School Should Stop Trying To Placate Him

Autumn Billings | 6.6.2025 1:21 PM

Texas Cop Who Killed Unarmed Man Is Not Entitled to Qualified Immunity

Tosin Akintola | 6.6.2025 1:00 PM

The 5 Worst Green Energy Projects Funded by Biden

Jeff Luse | 6.6.2025 12:45 PM

Why Can't Elon Musk and Donald Trump Both Win?

Christian Britschgi | 6.6.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!