JAMA Reports on a Public Health Controversy: Should the Surgeon General Lie, or Should He Tell the Truth?
An article in the current Journal of the American Medical Association reports on criticism of the Surgeon General's Office for misrepresenting its own report on the health hazards of secondhand smoke by implying that "brief exposure" can cause heart disease and lung cancer. This claim strongly influenced news coverage of the report, which played up the "no safe level" angle and suggested that if you're going to stand near a smoker you might as well be swallowing botulin. You have to pay for the full text of the JAMA article, but Michael Siegel, whose criticism is quoted in the piece, has a summary. Instead of defending the surgeon general's statements, a CDC official changed the subject, pretending the point was that people who already have heart or lung disease should avoid secondhand smoke.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
He should do the President's bidding, like all good soldiers do.