Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Why Germans Stopped Making Babies

Nick Gillespie | 7.5.2006 10:09 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Reader Rimfax points us to the latest picture book from Germany. It goes a long way--in cartoonish yet graphically disturbing detail--toward explaining low birth rates there. Read on Macduff.

At least the Bader-Meinhof-looking guy isn't wearing socks and sandals in the European manner.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Freedom of Speech for Some, Miniature American Flags for Others

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (29)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. jf   19 years ago

    The smiling baby popping out of the vagina with the "Ta-da!" look on his face is priceless. I imagine the birth of Jesus happened exactly as in that cartoon.

  2. the other Mark   19 years ago

    I have a new hero.

  3. jf   19 years ago

    I see that Ken Lay is dead of a heart attack.

    In his fucking VACATION HOME. Justice sucks.

  4. Mr. Nice Guy   19 years ago

    jf:

    At least we won't be wasting money on the guy in Country Club prison.

  5. PoN   19 years ago

    Not Safe For Work! We don't all have the good fortune to work for Reason.

  6. Daze   19 years ago

    Now we know where Teletubbies come from.

  7. Jennifer   19 years ago

    That's the sort of picture you guys hold in your mind when you're trying to . . . uh . . . achieve more "staying power," am I right?

  8. Mark VIII   19 years ago

    Hhhmmmm,

    This book is some sort of reprint.

    I had it when I was a kid.

    They're definitely swingers. No doubt.

  9. Mark VIII   19 years ago

    That's the sort of picture you guys hold in your mind when you're trying to . . . uh . . . achieve more "staying power," am I right?

    I think of Mr Bean dancing in his underpanse. That normally gives me an extra ten to fifteen.

    Seconds.

  10. Warren   19 years ago

    Not Safe For Work!
    Are you kidding? Where do you work?

    That's the sort of picture you guys hold in your mind when you're trying to . . . uh . . . achieve more "staying power," am I right?

    Now you know that's just crazy talk. It's not that she isn't a babe, it's that she gets pregnant. Nothing is more ... uh ... deflating, than the thought of responsibility. BTW, as of yesterday, this is the picture I've been working with 😉

  11. Timothy   19 years ago

    Oy vey.

  12. GM   19 years ago

    The words used for the father's genitalia - Schwaenzchen and Saecklein - are both in the diminutive. The normal, colloquial words are Schwanz (tail, literally, or dick) and Sack (you can probably guess). But the -chen and the -lein make them 'small', like -ito/a in Spanish and -ette in French. At this point in Germany, I am sure that Feminism was in full-swing, which trend probably also gave rise to the tendency of many households to demand that the male members sit rather than stand to urinate.

  13. Solitudinarian   19 years ago

    I'm not sure I buy the "use of diminutives for male genitalia=rampant feminism" theory, but the demand for male "Sitzpinkeln" is still quite high.

  14. Timothy   19 years ago

    I thought the sitzpinkel evolved from the bad design of German toilets.

  15. martin   19 years ago

    The captions are really priceless. Looks like one of those sex ed books from the 70s.
    The most infamous one, can't remember the title, had photos by Will McBride. The kind of pics now so highly illegal that they trump drugs as a cause for war, for abridgement of liberties and for politicical grandstanding. No mean feat. Then the book was available in libraries and was even used in some progressive schools. O tempora, o mores.
    At least in Germany I can wear speedoes without causing ruffled eyebrows, weird looks and funny comments. And I don't have to be afraid to be branded for life if I change from something wet into something dry in public.
    O America, o mores hilarula.

    Timothy, don't you think American toilets or no more splashproof, just noisier?

  16. GM   19 years ago

    That bad design I assume is what my anglophone friends and coworkers in Germany called "the observation platform," which allows the prudent individual the opportunity to see whether his digestive system is in proper working order.

  17. Timothy   19 years ago

    That is the design to which I was referring, yes. It is my understanding that the sitzpinkel developed to avoid splashback from this strange shelf. Having never been to Germany nor used one of their toilets, I have only diagrams and anecdotes. It's not that their isn't splash with an American toilet, but I imagine the splashback is less.

  18. ME   19 years ago

    A friend raised in Germany told me that the "observation platform" was required, because like all work products "you have to inspect it before you can ship it."

  19. s.m. koppelman   19 years ago

    1970s Germany had all the best kiddie sex-ed books. I grew up with Show Me! which was published in the US by St. Martins but it would be hard to imagine anything like it from a remotely mainstream publisher today.

  20. martin   19 years ago

    For what ist's worth, toilet trivia...

    The way I inderstand it, the design of German toilets has to do with the path of the water flow. American toilets drain to the bottom through a pipe in the floor. The stool is bolted to the pipe flange and the seal accomplished by a compressed wax ring. German splashproofs drain into a pipe protruding horizontally from the wall. This keeps the pipe from coming out the ceiling of the apartment below. The water has to flow down, through a trap loop to keep gases sealed off, back up and out. This requires a fast rush of water accomplished by a decreasing cross section and works even without a tank. In American toilets the volume of water from the tank raises the water level in the bowl causing a spill-over down the pipe.

  21. Stevo Darkly   19 years ago

    BTW, as of yesterday, this [link] is the picture I've been working with 😉

    Excellent photo!

  22. Jennifer   19 years ago

    Excellent photo!

    For purging your mind of dirty thoughts? Y'all are just cruel.

  23. Akira MacKenzie   19 years ago

    Yike! That made my genitals retreat into my thorax!

    BTW, what is it with the tendancy of some artists to draw the vulva as if it was IN FRONT of the woman, on the belly right below the navel, rather than in between the legs where it belongs? It's not as if we don't know it's there.

  24. Lowdog   19 years ago

    Wow, the similarities between Jennifer and a really, really good friend of mine are most striking. I'm sure I've mentioned it before, but that's the clearest pic of Jennifer I've seen, and aside from many personality and, um, life choices, they're very alike in the looks department, too. (Which is a positive thing, although I'm now lucky enough to have my own redhead to fawn over.) 🙂

  25. Stevo Darkly   19 years ago

    "Excellent photo!"

    For purging your mind of dirty thoughts? Y'all are just cruel.

    Not my intended meaning. It's downright smoldering.

    Out of respect for Jennifer and Jeff and what they have together, I will keep further thoughts to myself.

  26. Warren   19 years ago

    For purging your mind of dirty thoughts? Y'all are just cruel.

    Jennifer,
    Purging? Umm no, more like nurturing.

    Cruel? How so? I could, I suppose, type out (one handed) the elaborate story lines I've associated with that pic. Common decency demands that I spare you, and everyone else here, that particular horror.

    All I'm saying is that your photo is Aitch Oh Tee. I believe there is general agreement on this score. And not for nothing, but I really expect an ex-stripper to take the unrequited lust of strange men in stride.

    Of course you're just teasing us (as is the want of your kind) and I'm not taking it personally. Just an excuse to make another comment on the topic.

  27. Jennifer   19 years ago

    And not for nothing, but I really expect an ex-stripper to take the unrequited lust of strange men in stride.

    Yes, but back then it wasn't my ideas I was trying to get noticed.

  28. Marcvs   19 years ago

    Huh. I half expected a reference to Why Mommy is a Democrat. Oh well, I can't come up with a good one, but I'm sure there is one there.

    Maybe Help! Mom! There are Liberals Under My Bed! is a better choice.

  29. Ruthless Schick (-elgruber)   19 years ago

    If Brunhilde had used just a little more "blush powder," she wouldn't have had to settle for a guy with a beard.
    Just sayin'.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

California Enacts Sweeping Exemption to Development-Killing Environmental Law

Christian Britschgi | 7.1.2025 1:10 PM

Senate Votes 99–1 To Remove AI Moratorium from 'Big, Beautiful Bill' 

Jack Nicastro | 7.1.2025 12:27 PM

Why the 'Current Policy' Baseline Is a Massive Gimmick That Effectively Kills the Filibuster

Eric Boehm | 7.1.2025 12:00 PM

New Jersey Towns Face Setback in Lawsuit Against State's Affordable Housing Mandate

Tosin Akintola | 7.1.2025 11:45 AM

Why the NFLPA Kept Damning Collusion Evidence From Its Own Players

Jason Russell | 7.1.2025 11:25 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!