Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

As Goes Mel, So Goes …

David Weigel | 5.12.2006 11:54 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

So, is this it? Are pro-flagellation social conservatives finally going to jump off the Bush bandwagon?

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Science Panel Coerced Into Including Supporters of Abstinence-Only Sex Ed

David Weigel is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (33)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jersey McJones   19 years ago

    Wow! Good for Mel!

    JMJ

  2. Braveheart   19 years ago

    FREEEEEEEEEDOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!

  3. GM   19 years ago

    Ponnuru . . . yech.

  4. Evan   19 years ago

    "The fear-mongering we depict in the film reminds me of President Bush and his guys".

    Which is nothing like the fear-mongoring from the various salvationist religions, right? I mean, when you say to people, "you are all sinners, the wages of sin are death, in order to escape you must repent and come to church and pray and fork over your money to our coffers", that's not "fear-mongoring" at all, right Mel?

    Fucking hypocrites abound. He's right, of course, but he's got no room to talk whatsoever.

  5. Warren   19 years ago

    Oh man, One can only hope this escalates into an all out intra-zealot meltdown.

    I'm making popcorn.

  6. Dave W.   19 years ago

    The problem is that this movie will drive its audiences to kill political officials the same way the last one caused audiences to kill Jewish people./sarc

  7. Evan   19 years ago

    Farces Wanna Mo needs to work on his sarcasm a little bit.

  8. Randolph Carter   19 years ago

    Evan,
    Jesus never told anyone to go to church or give money to "the church" - don't paint all christians with that brush.

  9. Brian   19 years ago

    I've been hoping for some evangelical v. papist feudin'

  10. Evan   19 years ago

    Randolph,

    Regardless of the "go to church" or "give money" aspects, salvationist religion in general is all about fear mongoring. It's about scaring people, via the whole "sin" and "fiery pits of hell" thing, into "being saved". The above are just details.

  11. 76   19 years ago

    Jaymicjay: You're not even trying anymore, are you.

  12. David   19 years ago

    I wonder how quickly consevatives will turn on Mel Gibson after touting him as the antithesis of liberal Hollywood.

  13. Randolph Carter   19 years ago

    Evan,
    It's true that religions based on salvation idea tend to look to the next world rather than this one, but I think it's important to distinguish between church dogma and the actual teachings present in the sacred text the religion is based on. As far as fear-mongering and brimstone, that's basically a tactic churches started to use once they realized they could get some temporal power. It's certainly not what motivated the apostles or early christians.

  14. David T. Beito   19 years ago

    He was never on the bandwagon to begin with. He has been a long-time skeptic of the Iraq war.

  15. gaijin   19 years ago

    ...salvationist religion in general is all about fear mongoring.

    Evan: Is salvationist religion a particular kind or are you suggesting all religions (by virtue of their focus on an afterlife) are salvationist?

  16. BLG   19 years ago

    David T. B.,

    You're right. He has made anti-Iraq war statements in the past. As a matter of fact, he made those comments on a podium with Michael Moore when 'Passion' was at the height of its box office punch. I recall the conservative blogosphere erupting for a brief spell, but most pro-Bush christian types just swept it under the rug. However, he seemed to loose some of his golden-boy luster after those comments. My admiration for him boomed by about 100 dB, though.

  17. gaijin   19 years ago

    As far as fear-mongering and brimstone...It's certainly not what motivated the apostles or early christians.

    Randolph, I agree and would add that I beleive it is a grossly inaccurate stereotype to suggest that it [fm&b] is what motivates most of today's christian theists.

  18. Randolph Carter   19 years ago

    Apologies for making another potential religion thread. Dammit.

    On another note, Mel Gibson is pretty cool for drawing a connection between two governments that draw/drew their power from fear of dissolution.

  19. Jeff P   19 years ago

    On the subject of fear mongering, I submit this 'cuz it's funny:
    Kissing Hank's Ass
    http://www.jcnot4me.com/Videos/Kissing_Hanks_Ass-video.mov

  20. mk   19 years ago

    It looks like Mel has made the jump from Social Conservative to Declinist. Soon, he'll be blowing off lunch meetings with Rick Santorum (yes, he has done that)to dine with Chalmers Johnson and making references to "Imperator Bush".

    An improvement imo.

  21. Viking Moose   19 years ago

    MK:

    will Gaius be there, too?

  22. mediageek   19 years ago

    "I've been hoping for some evangelical v. papist feudin'"

    Screw that. I wanna see some Executive branch v. bloodthirsty Mayan feudin.'

    Warren, don't forget to sprinkle a little bit of red pepper on the popcorn. Gives it some zing.

  23. scape   19 years ago

    Gibson reveals he used present day American politics as an inspiration, claiming the government callously plays on the nation's insecurities to maintain power.

    Definite popcorn flick. The Mayan Civilization brought down by porn, meth, immigration and a nipple.

  24. mk   19 years ago

    will Gaius be there, too?

    Sure, I'd send them a round of drinks, wouldn't you?

  25. Phileleutherus Lipsiensus   19 years ago

    Will Gibson be nailing Bush's hands to a cross any time soon?

  26. Evan   19 years ago

    gaijin: salvationist refers to religions that are based on its adherents being "saved", by their adherence/worship, from various terrible things.

  27. eric mattingly   19 years ago

    I agree with Evan. If you're telling people to accept a given dogma or spend all eternity suffering, then you are fear mongering and by definition preaching fire and brimstone. Not all Christians believe this, but the vast majority do-- and so does Gibson, ergo he is being hypocritical.

  28. Scott   19 years ago

    Please explain how Christianity is not based entirely on fear mongering. Being told that failing to follow a strict behavioral code will result in an eternity of punishment from a loving God is not exactly a positive message.

  29. Randolph Carter   19 years ago

    For a full explaination, Scott, crack open the gospels. Jesus never threatened people (except moneychangers in the temple, which is a pretty interesting episode). He did not gain one follower by saying "follow me, or you'll go to hell." He did it through a message of love & compassion, plus a little incentive of "the kingdom of heaven." Many early Christians (being unfamiliar with or unwilling to accept the idea of a life after death, especially our modern conception of heaven as a place where you walk around on clouds and meet a bunch of already dead people) thought that the point of Jesus' teachings was to build a "kingdom of heaven" on earth. Before you scream "theocracy," they didn't want anyone else to have to change, they wanted to be separate and do their own thing.

    Christianity started its downward spiral with the Emperor Constantine, who got the daft idea of offering people the choice of conversion or death. This original mixing of temporal and spiritual authority really screwed the pooch, and continues to screw said pooch.

    But don't make sweeping statements about Christianity if you only have a caricature of what it's really about.

    GOD! sorry again about the religion thing, it just bugs me when people malign a set of moral teachings that are, at their base, pretty good.

  30. The King   19 years ago

    Hump, death, hump, death, hump, death?

  31. Robert   19 years ago

    Religions aren't based on sacred texts. Sacred texts are based on religions.

  32. thoreau   19 years ago

    Where is gaius, anyway?

    I miss him.

  33. ynot4tony2   19 years ago

    Can ANYONE find any more "criticism" of Bush from Mel, other than what's contained in the single quote "The fear-mongering we depict in the film reminds me a little of President Bush and his guys"?

    Nope. This is the case of the leftist media taking ONE SINGLE LINE out of an entire interview and makes that the ENTIRE STORY.

    Does that single line qualify as "scathing"? Did that one line really "slam" Bush? These are two terms used in most "news" stories about Gibson's interview in Hotdog magazine.

    Why do so many media outlets focus on the same solitary quote? Why do they parrot the words "slams" and "scathing"? It's simple: WEAK MINDS THINK ALIKE!

    The media are a bunch of Bush haters looking for any excuse to show conservatives "turning" on Bush.

    Hell, the media could focus on a single quote from me, and use it to portray me as a Clinton supporter.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Child Protective Services Investigated Her 4 Times Because She Let Her Kids Play Outside

Lenore Skenazy | 8.9.2025 7:00 AM

Religious Dissenters Fled Holland (The Netherlands) and Established Holland (Michigan)

Stephanie Slade | From the August/September 2025 issue

They Fled Socialism and Came to the U.S. Legally. Now the Trump Administration Is Trying To Deport Them.

Billy Binion | 8.8.2025 5:19 PM

A Terrible Environmental Law Finally Did Something Good: It Paused Construction of Alligator Alcatraz

Autumn Billings | 8.8.2025 4:28 PM

From Terror Sanctions to Military Strikes? Trump's Cartel Policy Sidesteps Congress

Matthew Petti | 8.8.2025 2:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!