Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

From "Stimulus Progression" to "Audio Branding" in 60 Years: A Short History of Contemporary Capitalism

Jesse Walker | 4.13.2006 9:15 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

In The New Yorker: a fascinating profile of the Muzak corporation.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Gretchen Wilson Beware

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (12)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. David   19 years ago

    For some reason, just seeing the word muzak causes muzak versions of Burt Bacharach songs to play in my head. Must be a flashback to being 5 years old and at Sears.

  2. Warren   19 years ago

    For Ann Taylor, you do something completely different. The Ann Taylor woman . . . wants everything bright and positive and optimistic and uplifting, so you avoid offensive themes and lyrics, and you think about Sting and Celine Dion . . .

    HA! That guy totally Diss - Missed Sting as inoffensive Ann Taylor Musak. I've been saying that for years. Well actually what I've been saying is more along the lines of "Sting is an over-rated ass, high on the smell of his own farts".

  3. Warren   19 years ago

    The company that became Muzak was founded by George Owen Squier, a career Army officer, who was born in Dryden, Michigan, in 1865. Squier earned a doctorate in electrical engineering from Johns Hopkins University

    WTF? What was electrical engineering in 1865? Edison's light was still over a decade away, not even an electric motor to run a fan on. There was the telegraph, but I can't think of a single other electrical device to be engineered. How could there possibly be a doctorate program?

  4. David   19 years ago

    He was born in 1865, Warren. So he could be looking at a doctarate 25 years later, say 1890. Besides, the telegraph was an electric device as was in use by 1865.

  5. Jesse Walker   19 years ago

    The article says he was born in 1865, not that he earned his doctorate then.

  6. Jesse Walker   19 years ago

    David beat me to it. Never mind!

  7. Warren   19 years ago

    Ah ha, punctuation trouble. Like the illiterate slut, I missed a period.

  8. Tim Cavanaugh   19 years ago

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but this article is a piece of shit. Owen knows nothing about the topic and is another pathetic boomer who needs to insert his own Klassik Rock Koolness every other paragraph. How bold he is, to be dismissing "bland, soulless" elevator music. Imagine the courage it takes to brave the wrath of Percy Faith and Mantovani at this late date! And the science he deploys...it's mind-boggling: The stark contrast between the Colonel's Taylorite pseudo-science and the state-of-the-art precision of contemporary Muzak, which is so custom-designed it requires a questionnaire of "seven or eight" questions!

    Anyway, I've been itching to rip this article up and I've got a lot more to say, but since I missed my chance I'll just say: David Ownen, you're no Marshall McGladbrooks.

  9. Jesse Walker   19 years ago

    Eh, I see that stuff as an acknowledgement of Muzak's traditional status among tastemakers. "People began to use the company's name as a generic term for anything bland, soulless, and uninspired--so much so that today many don't realize that the word has a non-pejorative application." That's true, innit?

  10. Tim Cavanaugh   19 years ago

    A by-no-means exhaustive catalogue of Owen's terminology:

    syrupy orchestral "elevator music"

    no longer terribly popular anywhere, except in Japan. ("The Japanese think they love it, but they actually don't," a former Muzak executive told me. "They'll get over it soon.")

    sanitized instrumental arrangements

    Muzak's bowdlerized hits

    anything bland, soulless, and uninspired

    sever itself from its stodgy past

    boring background music

    And then this gem:

    When I was in high school, my father brought home a Muzak-like record called "The Beatles Songbook, Vol. 4," by the Hollyridge Strings. He meant the purchase as a gesture of conciliation, but from my point of view the album might as well have been called "Why We Are in Vietnam" (or, more to the point, "Why I Am Not Going to Clean Up My Room"). As popular music acquired its increasingly rich topology of cultural, political, and sexual associations, Muzak?s bowdlerized hits seemed more and more like an affront.

    Imagine! The Man with all his hangups trying to bust the music of Owen and his Supah-Phreaky generation. I'd say he's not just acknowledging the status: He's letting his freak flags fly in right-on solidarity. (The Hollyridge Strings, by the way, were arranged by the great Stu Phillips. The work he did on the Beatles Songbook is really interesting, and if Owen weren't so offended by the idea that a square could cover the soundtrack of his life he would know that.)

    I restate, more vigorously, my original point: Owen hasn't got Clue One what he's talking about, from an historical, musical, cultural, sociological, or demographic perspective. Any spare Gladwell or even David Ross the New Yorker's got hanging around would have done a better job on this article. Maybe I'll write this argument up on my own site, but I'm not going to put it into the form of a disagreement with my right honorable colleague.

  11. Jesse Walker   19 years ago

    Owen casts himself (or his teenage self, anyway) in the doubter role. Does he stand by his former position, or does he reject it? You can make a case either way -- I read that Beatles story as self-mocking, but maybe I'm prone to projection. (At age 13 I claimed to have been offended by a Muzak version of a song by my then-fave rockers Styx.) Modern Muzak has certainly won over the adult Owen; and if its "audio branding" is no more scientific than "stimulus progression," it's certainly interesting, especially for those of us who have spent far too much time watching commercial radio stations attempt to do a much less precise version of the same thing.

  12. Warren   19 years ago

    Tim,
    At first I thought you were attempting sarcasm. But now I have no idea what you're raving about. Are you sincerely suggesting that the slushy orchestral remixes of pop tunes that made up the audio backdrop to my 70's youth are some overlooked musical masterpieces? The only thing I can figure is that you have some deep hated of Owen. Did he get some job you were up for? Does he owe you money? Fuck your sister?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Maryland's New 3 Percent Tax Will Chill the State's Emerging Tech Sector

Tosin Akintola | 7.6.2025 6:30 AM

Conflicts and Contrasts Make Jerusalem Endlessly Fascinating

Jacob Sullum | From the August/September 2025 issue

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!