Legal theory rockstar Richard Epstein worries about "Executive Power on Steroids" in today's Wall Street Journal. A close reading of the clauses of the Constitution concerning control of the military, Epstein argues, rebuts the notion that the president's "inherent authority" as commander in chief exempts him from having to comply with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
The mom got the kid back, but not the car.
American Thinker says its claims about Dominion Voting Systems were "completely false."
A comparison of Texas and California suggests that legal edicts matter less than The New York Times thinks.