Truth—the Best Propaganda?
For most of the Cold War, the United States' "public diplomacy" efforts mostly emanated from the United States Information Agency, which generally set up shop in embassies and libraries abroad, attempting to counter Soviet propaganda and get out the good Yankee word. Since the agency was killed in 1999 (its duties were folded into the State Deptartment), former USIA hands have become pretty embittered about what they feel was a short-sighted kneecapping of the crucial hearts-and-minds mission.
The Iraq-propaganda story, unsurprisingly, has been the straw that broke this particular camel's back. Here's an excerpt from a Dec. 18 column by retired USIA vet Guy Farmer:
During my 28-year career with the old U.S. Information Agency, one of my specialties was foreign media placement. And not once, never, did I pay for placement because that was the only way to maintain credibility with our local media contacts. What the Pentagon doesn't understand - and may never understand - is that once you start paying for media placement, your credibility is shot to hell and you've moved from the semi-respectable public affairs/public diplomacy business over the line into the murky world of paid publicity and advertising. That's a dividing line that every self-respecting journalist, Americans and foreigners alike, understands.
A personal anecdote: Early in my Foreign Service career, while serving as American embassy press attache in a Latin American democracy, I discovered that another agency of our government was paying for media placement. I immediately went to the ambassador and asked him to put a stop to that sub-rosa media activity on grounds that it was unethical and furthermore, that we could afford only one press attache at a time. He agreed and told the other guys to cease and desist, much to their chagrin. We - myself and my Press Section colleagues - went on to set media placement records in that front-line country, which shall remain nameless for obvious reasons.
Whole thing here. And here's a more recent account from old USIA Nigeria hand Patricia Lee Sharpe. Excerpt:
Working in Nigeria as a USIS Information Officer counteracting Soviet disinformation, I made an astonishing but reassuring discovery: facts are powerful and truth trumps fiction rather easily. A quick consultation with researchers back in Washington would give us what we needed to set the record straight on the latest gross distortion of US history or policy. We'd generate an honest story in a lively style with a Nigerian angle and it would be published.
Public diplomacy during the USIA era had an amazing placement record, but the whole process depended on credibility. Our material was self-serving, of course, but it was reprinted by influential local publications because it was relevant and trustworthy. That respect rested on two pillars: facts--and honest open attribution. Nothing phoney. Nothing hidden. We didn't slip cash to editors or reporters. We didn't conceal our authorship. […]
Of course, we had nothing to hide in those days either.
Another thing: This extremely effective USIA information operation in Nigeria was an incredibly inexpensive, in-house operation.
Both links via John Brown's Public Diplomacy Review.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"What the Pentagon doesn't understand - and may never understand - is that once you start paying for media placement, your credibility is shot to hell and you've moved from the semi-respectable public affairs/public diplomacy business over the line into the murky world of paid publicity and advertising. That's a dividing line that every self-respecting journalist, Americans and foreigners alike, understands."
Hmmmmmm...
Why do ex-USIA types hate America?
"What the Pentagon doesn't understand - and may never understand - is that once you start paying for media placement, your credibility is shot to hell and you've moved from the semi-respectable public affairs/public diplomacy business over the line into the murky world of paid publicity and advertising. That's a dividing line that every self-respecting journalist, Americans and foreigners alike, understands."
"I made an astonishing but reassuring discovery: facts are powerful and truth trumps fiction rather easily."
Amen.
Amen.
huh, truth trumps fiction, who woulda thunk it?
I made an astonishing but reassuring discovery: facts are powerful and truth trumps fiction rather easily.
Which explains why no one in the Mideast peddles or believes the blood libels or the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
New book title: Manufacturing the Illusion of Consent"
It puts me in mind of the Milton Friedman line:
"Underlying most arguements against the Free market is a lack of belief in Freedom itself."
so let me see about reworking that quote, to wit:
"underlying most arguements against the Free press, is a lack of belief in Freedom itself".
Which I think sums up RC Deans feelings (as expressed here) as well.
My apologies for singling Dean out, but I would point out that the only countries that believe in the "blood libels or the Protocols of the Elders of Zion" are those that have the same attitude towards the free press as the Bush admin.
only countries? do countries believe things? or do people? how bout the folks here in the US during any admin johnny likes that believe the libels or protocols? not sure you need to apologize cause I'm not sure you made any sense.
My apologies for singling Dean out, but I would point out that the only countries that believe in the "blood libels or the Protocols of the Elders of Zion" are those that have the same attitude towards the free press as the Bush admin.
You mean, "view critics as hostile, but at worst covertly fund some supporters in another country"? Damn, I'm more critical of the Bushies by the day, but we (and millions of people in the region) could only wish those governments had that attitude.
So, uh, what country was Armstrong Williams in?
Obligatory clarification: Feel free to strike the italicized phrase if you consider the Armstrong Williams thing to be the worst the Bush administration has done in this regard.
I would point out that the only countries that believe in the "blood libels or the Protocols of the Elders of Zion" are those that have the same attitude towards the free press as the Bush admin.
So members of groups like Aryan Nations live in the parts of the United States that don't have a First Amendment? I never realized Idaho had a government-run press.
Dear Grylliade: I love America. That's why I proudly represented our nation abroad for nearly 30 years. To criticize the practice of paying for media placement doesn't mean you hate America; it means you respect the concept of a free press, here and elsewhere. Have a nice day.
Dear Grylliade: I love America. That's why I proudly represented our nation abroad for nearly 30 years. To criticize the practice of paying for media placement doesn't mean you hate America; it means you respect the concept of a free press, here and elsewhere. Have a nice day.
Guy Farmer
Sorry, Guy W. Farmer. It's a pretty standard joke on this site, to insinuate that anyone who criticizes anything that's done to "fight terror" must hate America; why else would they criticize our Glorious Leader? It's meant as sarcasm, not as a serious statement.
I don't actually think you hate America; quite the opposite, in fact. I am proud of you, and others like you, for standing up and saying that what the Bush administration and the military are doing in this case is not only wrong, it's counter-productive. It needs to be said. Speaking truth to those in power is never easy, and I'm glad that you had the stones to do so.
I just hope Guy W. Farmer checks this site again. It would be a shame if he was turned off and never came back to read grylliade's reply.
Mr. Farmer,
What grylliade said. That stale joke gets flung around hourly on these threads, and the humor is based on the absurdity of anyone thinking its subject, such as yourself in this case, actually hates America.