The $44 Billion Black Hole
In case you missed it, here's a funny story from last week:
In an apparent slip, a top American intelligence official has revealed at a public conference what has long been secret: the amount of money the United States spends on its spy agencies.
At an intelligence conference in San Antonio last week, Mary Margaret Graham, a 27-year veteran of the Central Intelligence Agency and now the deputy director of national intelligence for collection, said the annual intelligence budget was $44 billion.
That's about $150 million a year for every man, woman and child in this wondrous land of ours. It's also up from the $26.7 billion spent in 1998, the last year the spooks 'fessed up (they continue to resist Freedom of Information lawsuits asking for spy budgets going all the way back to the 1940s).
Feel intelligent yet?
Link via Secrecy News, which also points to this Federal Times article on same.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
$150 million per person? Think you have a typo there...
Unless there are 293.3 people in the U.S.
293 vast, mighty people capable of crushing some lesser countries in their meaty fists, may not need powerful spy organizations, no.
I swear to God I won the City of Long Beach's Junior High School Math Bowl in 1983....
Well, I can see at least 0.000006 people right here in the office, so that sounds about right.
Don't tread on the Mega-People!
Shouldn't that be "Eric the .0000005b"?
re:$44 billion, Y'know, I'd kinda always assumed it was more than that...
Well, just the R&D for those cool little gadgets probably eats about half of that.
Not to mention Jennifer Garner's wardrobe for all those undercover missions.
Oh, wait, you mean TV isn't real? Damn.
Shouldn't that be "Eric the .0000005b"?
"Eric the 5E-7b" Hmm... ...Nah
Jennifer Garner's wardrobe
Heck, we could probably afford Section 1 (and all the other sections) with that budget. Then imagine all the debates we could have!
$44 billion, and the most creative denial they can formulate for some FOIA requests is the Glomar response? They could at least hire a few writers and make the excuses entertaining.
Actually, that should be "Eric the (5E-7)b", it occurs to me...
Eric:
Now you sound like a Tax Code subsection.
I'll feel more intelligent when you get going on the FOIA suit captioned Welch v. OMB. Stop bitchin'. Start doing your journalist job.
Next CIA "Leak" Investigation in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
Now you sound like a Tax Code subsection.
I'm wounded.
To the more serious point here, is $44B so much to be spending? I'll happily pay $150 a year for our intelligence apparatus.
Now, if the complaint here is that our intelligence SUCKS, well, then I'm sympathetic.
But if it's just that we're spending a lot, and libertarians don't like that, well, let's get serious here.
Let us not forget that it was the Intelligence Community that produced the $44B figure. That means it obviously has to be accurate, right?
I'll happily pay $150 a year for our intelligence apparatus.
Yeah, if it worked worth a damn. I'm trying to remember the last major threat assessment the CIA got right.
We don't hear about the ones they geet right, RC.
No news is good news, know what I mean?
CIA budget '98: $26.8B
Total Intelligence budget '05: $44B
Theoretically the latter figure includes the National Security Agency, which is said to be much larger than the Central Intelligence Agency, right?
Can someone explain what we're supposed to do with these numbers?
Grid:
Apparently it involves dividing by 293.3.
To the more serious point here, is $44B so much to be spending?
For the quality? I think so.
Let's see, intelligience agency spending jumped from some $26 billion dollars in 1998 to $44 billion now? Memory fades, but did not something rather big and disastrous happen to the US between that time? And was not failures of intelligience a big reason given as to why that atrocity was not prevented?
Granted, throwing money at a problem is rarely the optimal solution, but it is the one Congress usually settles on. In short, that big increas in intelligience budgets is a big shock, how?
MJ, it's not that it's a shock for the budget to increase, it's that it takes tremendous measures to even find out what the budget is.