Sell, but Don't Tell
Last June, after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that bans on direct shipments to consumers by out-of-state wineries were an unconstitutional barrier to interstate commerce, the Minnesota legislature changed state law to allow such shipments. Yet it retained Minnesota's prohibition of Internet sales and advertising by wineries. The upshot is that wineries are free to sell directly to consumers, but they can't do it or talk about it online, a crippling restriction for small operations without local distributors. The Institute for Justice, which filed one of the lawsuits that led to the Supreme Court decision, is challenging Minnesota's advertising and sales restrictions, which apply to both in-state and out-of-state wineries but not to liquor stores, as a violation of vintners' rights to free speech and equal protection.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good luck enforcing that law against out of state vinters'.
Sounds like a case of sour grapes to me.
(I'm sorry, I couldn't resist.)
I think PA just passed a law that prohibits people from receiving shipments of wine at their homes; we have to have it shipped to the "State Store" and pick it up there. We have some of the stupidest liquor laws here.
All to protect the children, I'm sure
Hmm...I never lived in Minnesota so I'm not sure about the goals of this particular state sponsored legislation.
Is this action some sort of statewide protectionism to give an advantage to local wine producers; some kind of religious statement; a fear of underage drinking (er..and the internet)?..or all of the above?
Just curious..