A Society of Volunteer Rescuers
More from Matt Taibbi's Katrina dispatch:
On our way into town, we come across a small group of shirtless civilians tinkering with a couple of beat-up motorboats. They have the look of fishermen getting ready for a long day's work….The boaters explain that they are ordinary city residents who have spent the last six consecutive days going out, pulling people out of their houses and bringing them to dry land. At first they are civil and friendly, but when we ask where the police and National Guard boats are, they suddenly take on the character of an angry, pitchfork-wielding mob.
"Ain't nobody helping these people except us," says Ryan Asmussen, a young man with a shaved head and a workingman's deep tan. "All these people are dying and nobody's helping us with them. We're out here all day long."
"They fly overhead," adds Tim Thomas, a slightly older man with a mustache. "But they're not out there on the boats. What they do is fly overhead in the helicopters, and when they see someone trapped, they hover. And then we've got to go fish 'em out."
"What about FEMA?" I ask.
The men erupt in snorts and derisive laughs. "If FEMA was here, people like us wouldn't be in a goddamn boat," Asmussen snaps. "They left it to us."
"It's a clusterfuck," says Thomas, shaking his head. "A total clusterfuck."…
[T]here is no question that the civilians have done the bulk of the boat-rescue work in the crucial first week after the storm. A kind of society of volunteer rescuers has formed organically in places like this section of Napoleon Avenue; they are all over the city, and all have similar stories of being forced into action by the sheer incompetence of the authorities.
It's a great piece. Read the whole thing.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This government views citizens as part of the problem, and would rather keep them out of the process. If they don't have the right security clearance, who knows, they might be terrorists!
I hope they were all wearing PFDs.
You know, some of those folks are probably wearing "bulky" jackets.
You know, some of those folks are probably wearing "bulky" jackets.
Look out! It's Osama Bin Laden's Crack Underwater Assassination Squad!
It turns out that govt and other highly bureaucratic organizations such as the Red Cross can be a very effecive impediment to disaster relief. Volunteer individuals don't have protocols and hierarchies to observe, respect, and dispute, and are thus often much quicker to respond to such emergencies. The downside of course is that individuals are usually not well equipped with specialized equipment and resources that may be beneficial when dealing with large disasters.
We all know that the hand wringing that will go on in DC over Katrina will result in an even more forceful federal response to future disasters. That is, I think most of us will agree, a bad bad thing.
For an option going the other way, and something that would actually improve the situation, might I suggest that FEMA should take a page from the FAA. Rather than be the sole first responders, FEMA instead should have the authority to license private organizations and their workers for emergency relief services.
This move would make vast resources of the nation available to help in an emergency. The "who rescues the rescuers" argument used by the State of Louisiana to keep the Red Cross out would be countered by the skills proved by the license the Red Cross rep would show. Integration and communication between FEMA and loads of helpers would be prearranged.
Note that it might not be profitable to actually maintain companies to do this. But preexisting companies who have a widely distributed presence, like State Farm or WalMart, could have subsets of their employees do the FEMA certification. Those people would be allowed to go into disaster zones as quickly as any government agency, and the problems we saw on TV of the city and state keeping everyone out while waiting for the federal government to show up on their white horses would vanish.
Most of all there would be a much better notion that it is "we" the people not "they" the federal government that are the first responders to a disaster. Both the recognition of volunteers or private relief services and the cooperation between them and the government efforts would be vastly improved.
One of the others mentioned in this article is also planning a book on this. I'm sure it'll be fair and balanced. Thanks for the Katrina stories in this and the other posts, I'll be sure to give you props when I add them. I'll also use the nofollow tag.
"A kind of society of volunteer rescuers has formed organically in places like this section of Napoleon Avenue; they are all over the city, and all have similar stories of being forced into action by the sheer incompetence of the authorities."
Music to an anarchist's ear.
But anarchy is never "forced" by government incompetence. Anarchy is always there ready to emerge. The only things to be regretted are the wasted effort of government and the MISPLACED FAITH in government.
Rather than be the sole first responders, FEMA instead should have the authority to license private organizations and their workers for emergency relief services.
This Chicago Tribune article talks about the fact that FEMA has contracts with individual private companies to supply relief services, in this case bus transportation.
The best bit:
I'd think broad licensing would be a much better approach than individual contracts for mustering private efforts.
INdividual volunteers helping individuals stranded and in need... Wow, what could be more libertarian than that?
Wayne-That's kind of what I was thinking. In an ideal society, it wouldn't take blinding incompetence to motivate people to help each other in emergencies.
And before the howling begins, I am not advocating communitarianism; I'm suggesting that when the shit hits the fan, decent people help those who need it.
"You know, some of those folks are probably wearing "bulky" jackets."
LOL!
But anarchy is never "forced" by government incompetence. Anarchy is always there ready to emerge. The only things to be regretted are the wasted effort of government and the MISPLACED FAITH in government.
Just so no one gets the impression that I think turning FEMA into a licensing and oversight body is the best of all worlds, let me pile on to Ruthless's sentiment here.
But we're not going to see Congress shackling itself in response to Katrina. On the other hand, I do think that it might be possible to turn the legislation that will come out of this disaster into something that positively brings private and voluntary resources to bear on future emergency relief and rescue efforts -- that, most importantly, forces the government to see volunteers as help rather than impediment or competition.
It turns out that govt and other highly bureaucratic organizations such as the Red Cross can be a very effecive impediment to disaster relief. - Shecky
The story I'm about to tell is pure anecdote. It is my own personal experience, but I have no idea if this was an isolated incident or a common problem, so help yourself to some salt grains.
I have an aunt who was involved with the relief efforts for hurricane Andrew at her church in Florida way back when. TONS and TONS of tools and materials were given to her church by the Red Cross. The church parking lot was turned into a staging area where people affected by the hurricane could come and pick up free supplies to start rebuilding their homes. I was hired to drive a forklift, inventory the stuff, and guard the lot in the evenings. I was there for about 4 months. During that time we supplied materials to (I'm not kidding here) ONE elderly woman to repair her roof. This woman's roof was not damaged during the hurricane. We had plywood, shingles, nails, tar paper and everything you could ever want to repair the roofs of a thousand homes, but couldn't do anything with it because the building code in Dade County, Florida prevents anyone but a locally licensed contractor to do so much as carry a hammer onto a roof there. So the stuff sat in the lot and got rained on night after night, week after week. As a result, all the stuff slowly went out the back door, so to speak, to people who knew which church member to grease. Brand new water heaters were given away to neighbors whose units had broken long after the hurricane was gone. Church volunteers walked out with a new flashlight every evening, or a case of batteries. The guy from the church who was running the relief effort eventually left and he took with him a pickup truck full of enough power tools to nicely outfit his garage 2 or 3 times over once he got home. At one point an entire pallet of 3/4" plywood just disappeared in broad daylight. In 4 months the ONE evening I wasn't guarding the lot the tool tent was raided and half of the power tools disappeared. As far as I could tell, not a single hurricane victim was helped while I was there, but the church still managed to burn through $1 million of Red Cross money repaving their parking lot and converting the horse barn behind the building into a nice little house for one of the volunteer cronies. I could go on. After seeing that, I will never donate a nickle to the Red Cross. The organization impedes rebuilding efforts by taking donations and diverting them to the pockets of people who were not the intended recipients. You'll do as much good setting your money on fire.
Oh, and after all this the damn minister came to me one day and bitched up a storm because I refused to attend the church services. Apparently I was the one who wasn't setting a good example.
Lot of good comments here, and as much as I'd like to rant on about anarchy and how great it is to live in a free society just begging for this type of heroism to assert itself, I have to say WOW, what a great article. Taibbi has definitely improved since his days with the NY Press -- it's like he was channeling Hunter S. Thompson. And just when I thought Rolling Stone was completely irrelevant!
On the other hand, I do think that it might be possible to turn the legislation that will come out of this disaster into something that positively brings private and voluntary resources to bear on future emergency relief and rescue efforts -- that, most importantly, forces the government to see volunteers as help rather than impediment or competition.
MikeP,
Love, lollipops and pixie dust up your anus.
Love, lollipops and pixie dust up your anus.
Thanks, Ruthless. Is that a good thing?
In particular, I hope you took "pile on to Ruthless's sentiment" as "agree with Ruthless's sentiment" rather than "disagree with Ruthless's sentiment."
MikeP,
I meant it in a good way.
Pixie dust is an old folk remedy for piles.
"forces the government to see volunteers as help rather than impediment or competition."
MikeP,
Now I think I recall the phrase that caused me to resort to the pixie dust analogy.
There it is.
Peace and love.