Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
A. Tuchman

Donate

Sont les mots qui vont très bien ensemble

Julian Sanchez | 8.12.2005 3:33 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Sometime Reason contributor Dave Weigel tracks Michelle Malkin's…. evolving views on the propriety of speaking for other people's kids in political debate.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A Libertarian Rorschach Test?

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (28)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. rafuzo   20 years ago

    it's very important we have people tracking and calling bullshit on these highly influential citizens ("and their paymasters"!) who hold terrible sway over the sentiments of millions. Hypocrisy, hypocrisy, and then there's this. bravo, Mr. Weigel.

  2. thoreau   20 years ago

    Michelle Malkin's children must be deeply ashamed of her.

  3. Brian   20 years ago

    Someone could write an interesting book about where people like Malkin come from. They seem to just show up one day on the tube as designated pundits but I know behind the scenes she must have been on some farm team or interning or something. Where does she get her ideas? Does she even write the stuff that comes out under her name? Who pays for it?

    There were a whole lot of bleach bottle Eva Brauns that showed up in the 90s (Monica Crowley is a good example) . . . I guess they decided they needed some international flava.

    (yeah, slow day at the office)

  4. Dogzilla   20 years ago

    "Sont des mots qui vont tr?s bien ensemble"

    AKA
    "Someday monkey won't play piano song"

  5. metalgrid   20 years ago

    Where does she get her ideas? Does she even write the stuff that comes out under her name? Who pays for it?

    Ever taken a look at TechCentralStation? Shilling isn't just the province of one kind of lunatic.

  6. mobile   20 years ago

    "Mr. Hackworth," Finkle-McGraw said after the pleasantries had petered out, speaking in a new tone of voice, a the-meeting-will- come-to-order sort of voice, "please favour me with your opinion of hypocrisy."

    "Excuse me. Hypocrisy, Your Grace?"

    "Yes. You know."

    "It's a vice, I suppose."

    "A little one or a big one? Think carefully --much hinges upon the answer."

  7. Rich Ard   20 years ago

    Why on earth would you have a copy of a Neal Stephenson book close to hand this early in the day?

  8. Akira MacKenzie   20 years ago

    Ah! From "The Diamond Age." I knew the exchange seemed familar.

  9. Rich Ard   20 years ago

    Familiar, but not memorized; it frightens me to think that perhaps mobile just enjoys Stephenson's work enough to get passages down (or not - as stated, I haven't memorized it).

  10. Todd Fletcher   20 years ago

    "Someone could write an interesting book about where people like Malkin come from. They seem to just show up one day on the tube as designated pundits..."

    She's on TV because she's photogenic.

  11. independent worm   20 years ago

    Ever taken a look at TechCentralStation? Shilling isn't just the province of one kind of lunatic.

    Occasional contributions there from our own beloved Reasonoids notwithstanding, I'm glad I'm not the only one here who thinks so. I have seen some WHACKED out stuff on my few ventures to that site. To the point where I felt my very cognition had been violated merely by having taken in some of the insane and twisted "logic" on display there.

    And while I'm on the subject, while I generally enjoy portions of the Lew Rockwell site, he's got some seriously butt-useless dopes masquerading as pundits linked there.

  12. sidereal   20 years ago

    She didn't just rise out of the devil's bowels. She put a lot of time in being insane and incoherent for the Seattle Times before she graduated to being insane and incoherent nationally.

  13. Jim Walsh   20 years ago

    "Someone could write an interesting book about where people like Malkin come from..."

    Somewhere along the way she had to have a mentor or benefactor, someone with more money than taste who saw something in her "ideas." We need to find this guy, whoever he is, and lobotomize him immediately in the interests of public safety.

  14. Mo   20 years ago

    saw something in her "ideas." We need to find this guy, whoever he is, and lobotomize him immediately in the interests of public safety

    Too late for that, doncha think?

  15. Amy Phillips   20 years ago

    Perhaps what we should do is find a place where potential benefactors congregate and then get the cops to institute a program of randomly searching them for signs that they're planning another Michelle Malkin. That way, we can reassure the public that we're protecting them from potential future acts of idiot punditry and show our commitment to preventing future Michelle Malkins. Then, when we run for reelection, no one can accuse us of being soft on pseudojournalism.

  16. Stevo Darkly   20 years ago

    But why does Michelle Malkin keep getting hotter and hotter as she gets whackier and whackier? What hand framed this fearful symmetry?

    Fortunately, I recently realized that with just a little bit of editing, I can twist any Michelle Malkin column into my wildest, most perverted sexual fantasies. Example:

    Before:
    February 6, 2002: If you are sick of hearing about teen pop star Britney Spears -- what she wore (or didn't wear) in her Pepsi Super Bowl ads, where she violated underage drinking laws, how she enjoyed being licked by a dancer in her obscene music video "I'm a Slave 4 U," and all the other self-indulgent details -- there is an alternative. Her name is Mandy Moore.

    After:
    February 6, 2002: A dozen flickering candles illuminated the bedchamber where my prize awaited me. "If you are sick of hearing about teen pop star Britney Spears -- what she wore (or didn't wear) in her Pepsi Super Bowl ads, where she violated underage drinking laws, how she enjoyed being licked by a dancer in her obscene music video 'I'm a Slave 4 U,' and all the other self-indulgent details -- there is an alternative. Her name is Mandy Moore," Michelle Malkin tried to say, but couldn't, because of the ballgag.

    Etc., etc.

  17. Jim Walsh   20 years ago

    Michelle Malkin tried to say, but couldn't, because of the ballgag.

    Well, you definitely have my attention...

  18. drf   20 years ago

    un moment, s'il vous plait:

    "voulez-vous coucher avec moi" ont cinq mots...

    which three words?

    (ha ha)

  19. Stevo Darkly   20 years ago

    Well, you definitely have my attention...

    I think thoreau and joe have previously spoken of perverse Michelle Malkin fantasies too. We could form a club. Although the meetings would be pretty lame with, like, four guys and no Michelle Malkin.

  20. thoreau   20 years ago

    Stevo, your Michelle Malkin fantasies are far better than most of mine.

    The best, however, involves her, two other hot female conservative pundits, a wardrobe malfunction...and the MUTE button on my remote!

  21. Hakluyt   20 years ago

    Stevo Darkly,

    But why does Michelle Malkin keep getting hotter and hotter as she gets whackier and whackier?

    You must like cross-eyed chicks.

  22. Phil   20 years ago

    Well, in Stevo's defense, I always kinda dug Karen Black.

  23. fyodor   20 years ago

    fwiw, it's "sont les mots" or am I missing a joke?

  24. Julian Sanchez   20 years ago

    No, that's a typo--I initially refrained from fixing it because MT stores these things by their titles and I was worried it might lose the comments or something if I changed it. But I vaguely remember having fixed a title before without incident, so maybe I'lll see what happens...

  25. Jim Walsh   20 years ago

    ...and I can't be the only guy who has pictured Ann Coulter as Ilsa She-Wolf Of The SS...

  26. mediageek   20 years ago

    I think thoreau and joe have previously spoken of perverse Michelle Malkin fantasies too. We could form a club. Although the meetings would be pretty lame with, like, four guys and no Michelle Malkin.

    Glad to see I'm not the only one with thoughts of hot, hot crazy statist action.

    Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter.

    I like to call that fantasy "Angry Sandwich."

  27. Stevo Darkly   20 years ago

    Actually, Michelle Malkin has said many things that I agree with. However, when she starts talking about pop culture and how it erodes morality, I think she gets a little unhinged.

    But moving on ...

    Gentlemen, if conservative pundits like Michelle Malkin or Ann Coulter cause us to have twisted, perverse and perhaps unhealthy sexual fantasies, then I think we need to look deep, deep into ourselves and ask ourselves some hard questions:

    1) What's wrong with these chicks, that they cause us to have these evil thoughts?

    2) Are these women dangerous?

    3) Should their writings be banned?

    4) Or should the women themselves be locked up in camps, to insure they can't infect our minds?

    5) Don't forget, once they arrive at the camp, they have to be stripped naked and then hosed down, for cleanliness.

    6) What clothing should be issued to camp residents? Something tight and skimpy, to minimize the risks of hiding contraband. I'm thinking short-shorts and belly shirts for daytime wear, and black lacy lingerie at night.

    7) Oh, God. This is seriously a problem.

  28. Julian Sanchez   20 years ago

    The only part of any of this that's even vaguely appealing is the ball gag, and for reasons having nothing to do with sex.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 806 donors, we've reached $540,694 of our $400,000 $600,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

Donate Now

Latest

Why I Support Reason with a Tax-Deductible Donation (and You Should Too!)

Nick Gillespie | 12.7.2025 8:00 AM

Trump Thinks a $100,000 Visa Fee Would Make Companies Hire More Americans. It Could Do the Opposite.

Fiona Harrigan | From the January 2026 issue

Virginia's New Blue Trifecta Puts Right-To-Work on the Line

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 12.6.2025 7:00 AM

Ayn Rand Denounced the FCC's 'Public Interest' Censorship More Than 60 Years Ago

Robby Soave | From the January 2026 issue

Review: Progressive Myths Rebuts the Left's Histrionic Takes

Jack Nicastro | From the January 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks