When Flat Numbers Indicate a Rising Problem

|

As Julian notes, Slate's Jack Shafer does a fine job of dissecting Newsweek's hysterical methamphetamine cover story. Among other things, Shafer points out that Newsweek fails to cite numbers to support the idea that we are in the midst of a meth "epidemic." In particular, there are no figures indicating that use is on the rise, just an assertion that "more than 12 million Americans have tried methamphetamine, and 1.5 million are regular users, according to federal estimates."

There's a reason for this omission: The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), the source of the numbers cited by Newsweek, indicates that, if anything, meth use declined slightly between 2002 and 2003, the most recent year for which data have been reported. Prior to 2002, the survey (then known as the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, or NHSDA) used a different methodology, so the earlier numbers are not comparable. Looking just at the NHSDA numbers, past-year methamphetamine use, which was first listed as a separate category in 1999, was flat between then and 2001. Lifetime methamphetamine use, which seems to have been first reported in 1998, jumped from 2.1 percent that year to 4.3 percent in 1999, then remained more or less flat through 2001.

Trends aside, Newsweek misrepresents the situation as of 2003. It's correct that 5.2 percent of respondents reported that they had ever tried meth (again, this number should not be compared to pre-2002 figures), which translates into 12.3 million people nationwide. But the 1.5 million "regular users" claimed by Newsweek were in fact people who had used meth at any time in the previous year, even if it was only once or twice (and that number comes from the 2002 survey; the following year it dropped to 1.3 million). In both 2002 and 2003, past-month use was reported by just 0.3 percent of respondents, which indicates there were at most about 600,000 people who could be considered "regular users," and then only by a pretty loose definition. If "regular" use means at least once a week, the number would be even smaller. In other words, these data indicate that a small minority of meth users consume it regularly, which contradicts Newsweek's portrait of the drug's irresistible allure.

NEXT: That Frothy Mixture of Statism and the Dems

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Most people who claim to have used drugs on surveys only say so because they get pleasure from giving an answer they think is funny. A drug user, especially a regular drug user, might be concerned the survey might be a hoax intended to gather evidence against him.

  2. As Thomas Sowell routinely notes, mundane things, such as actual facts, are irrelevant to the demagogues.

  3. Really, the only time I’ve ever had the urge to use meth (or any other amphetamine) is when I was really, really tired. It’s nice to feel alert and competent, but then you have to deal with the crash afterwards.

    It’s just not that addictive. Vicodin’s more addictive; every time I’ve ever been prescribed Vicodin, I finish the prescription with a sad longing, and have a vague unsettled craving for days afterwards.

  4. This is all part of Newsweek’s secret plan to increase readership. 1, make public hysterical about crystal meth. 2, public supports government crackdown that makes Sudafed available only by prescription. 3, people have to go to the doctor whenever they get a cold. And 4, since everybody knows that most people only read Newsweek when they’re stuck in a waiting room, readership skyrockets. Brilliant!

    Me, I’d just put pictures of nekkid ladies in the mag to increase sales. But whatever.

  5. Is this the theatre where Reefer Madness is showing?

  6. I have a feeling that if it becomes too costly and troublesome to manufacture meth, some evil genius out there is going to figure out how to make a superdrug out of things even more common than pseudofed is now — say, baking soda & aspirin.

    If there isn’t actually one out there trying it already.

  7. I’ll get right on it.

  8. I like that the national survey is NS-DUH.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.