Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Senate Judiciary Committee Bleg

Julian Sanchez | 8.2.2005 1:00 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

This has already made the rounds, but in case you want to add to the seven questions Matt Welch had for the new Supreme Court nominee, Senate Democrats are taking suggestions.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Architect of the Iraq War Addresses "Intelligent Design"

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (10)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. anon   20 years ago

    Only women senators care what I think?

    Weird.

  2. Warren   20 years ago

    anon,
    Yeah that is weird.

    Julian, I think your seven questions are great. I'm going to cut and paste each of them into that site.

  3. gaius marius   20 years ago

    jesus christ. they're taking requests from the crowd? play freebird!

  4. Steven Crane   20 years ago

    Allow me to be the first:

    "John Roberts, why do you hate America?"

  5. nmg   20 years ago

    I like this one: "5) You're on a lifeboat, but it can only hold 8 of the original 10 amendments without sinking, killing your whole family. Which ones go?"

    I'd go with the 3rd, since it's basically irrelevant today, and the .... 8th I guess, since two of the three clauses are meaningless.

    nmg

  6. ChicagoTom   20 years ago

    I think Matt's question #4 is where Robert's scares me the most. Although I am not expert, I believe his record is one of supporting the expanding powers of the Executive and limiting the ability of the Judiciary to review some of these expanded powers.

    Arthur Silber had a pretty good couple of posts about this here and here

  7. thoreau   20 years ago

    Judge Roberts, what is the air speed velocity of an unladen swallow?

  8. Portlander   20 years ago

    Judge Roberts, you do realize that the appearance of this committee on Saturday Night Live during the Thomas confirmation was not news footage, but a satire? With that understanding in place, what is your favorite porn scene: straight, lesbian, 2 guys and a girl, or two girls and a guy?

  9. Axel Kassel   20 years ago

    "Judge Roberts, if Senator Voinovich announced that he would cry if you tried to reverse Roe v. Wade, would that affect your judgment on the case?"

  10. thoreau   20 years ago

    Judge Roberts, the question is very simple: Where is the beef?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Haste Begets Lawlessness

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 12:01 AM

D.C. Pauses Plans To Hike Minimum Wage for Tipped Workers

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 6:00 PM

It's Rand Paul and Elon Musk vs. Donald Trump Over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'

Eric Boehm | 6.3.2025 4:35 PM

Female Nude Spa in Washington Can't Bar Transgender Clients With Male Genitalia, Federal Court Rules

Billy Binion | 6.3.2025 4:20 PM

Trump Cut Funds From Wasteful Projects To Spend on Wasteful Statue Garden

Joe Lancaster | 6.3.2025 3:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!