Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Honest to Goodness, the Bars Weren't Open This Morning—They Must've Been Voting for the President or Something

Jesse Walker | 7.18.2005 10:54 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Seymour Hersh's latest report for The New Yorker says that Washington ran a covert operation to help Iyad Allawi's list in Iraq's January election.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Is It Safe?

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (19)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Franklin Harris   21 years ago

    Is is as unexpected as the results of an expose that uncovers that the sky is blue.

  2. John   21 years ago

    Yeah! More X/Knitters/Exene/John Doe references, please!

    We're desperate. Get used to it.

  3. Hakluyt   21 years ago

    Franklin Harris,

    The U.S. has a long tradition of trying to strong-arm foreign elections.

  4. Franklin Harris   21 years ago

    One of these days, I'll post something here without a typo!

    Anyway: "Is is" should be "It is."

  5. joe   21 years ago

    The standing question about the Great NeoCon Crusade has been whether they are trying to promote democracy, or merely "democracy."

    Score one for Option B.

  6. phocion   21 years ago

    That's quite a conundrum. Do you attempt to rig an election to prevent another nation's rigging from giving a majority of votes to one party? Is an election specially rigged to be more representative an improvement over a government that was simply appointed? Glad I'm not in charge of answering those questions. Obviously it will be some time before elections there meet Western standards, US meddling or not.

    As for the timing of the election, it has yet to be seen whether it was held too late or too early. If things stabilize somewhat after the constitution is ratified and the first elections under it are held, then I think the case can be made that the elections were too late. If the establishment of a sovereign state leads to greater sectarian warfare, then it was too early. Six months out, I think the jury's still out on the wisdom of having the election when we had it.

  7. Hakluyt   21 years ago

    phocion,

    In the main the U.S. was intimidated by the Shi'ites in Iraq; indeed, its because of their protests that elections were held in the first place. The Bush administration wouldn't have held an election were it not for domestic Iraqi pressure. That's why their claims about leading the way re: the election are hopelessly dishonest.

  8. joe   21 years ago

    To be fair, Bush also brought Allawi into our country last fall to try to tip the outcome of our elections, too.

  9. Josh   21 years ago

    Is is as unexpected as the results of an expose that uncovers that the sky is blue.

    This is Sy Hersh: the correct analogy is an expose that reveals the sky is green.

  10. Dynamist   21 years ago

    Josh: Wouldn't it be that the sky was recolored as part of a military-industrial scheme, and the government cooperated in a cover-up to convince us that the sky was supposed to look just as it does?

  11. joe   21 years ago

    Wait, wait, is he fat? Hersch, is he fat?

    Dammit, how are we going to get people to ignore the information in the article if we can't call the guy fat?

  12. Dynamist   21 years ago

    "Hey, everybody, the fat guy is crying wolf again! Who wants to read his article?"

  13. Matt   21 years ago

    When has Sy Hersh been wrong?

  14. Hakluyt   21 years ago

    Matt,

    Hawks of every stripe have been after Hersh ever since My Lai; some even call him a "terrorist." 🙂

  15. Matt   21 years ago

    My Lai happened, right? The Israelis have nukes, right (The Samson Option)? Prisoners were tortured at Abu Ghraib, right?

    I guess we havent invaded Iran yet. Wasnt that predicted for this summer? Seems to me he's right alot more than he's wrong.

  16. Palchak   21 years ago

    Counterpoint: Yes, and so what? Politicians attempting to manipulate political process; film at eleven.

  17. gaius marius   21 years ago

    he has been wrong in the past, mr matt -- he's not superhuman. but most of the time he's been extraordinarily correct.

    it's simply easier, if you are of a certain political religion, to demonize the man than to deal with the unpleasant truths he has a habit of writing about.

    i will say that hersh's exposure of what we all knew to be quite likely is important simply because his work documents and evidences the event in as rigorous a manner as is possible in the national-security-secrecy state.

  18. joe   21 years ago

    Wrong? He's been WRONG?

    We can't trust somebody who has a history of getting stories wrong, regarless of his evidence.

    We should just trust the president. He wouldn't steer us wrong.

  19. Dynamist   21 years ago

    joe: At last the pills are taking effect. I promise everything will be clear soon...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Energy Department Moves To Fast-Track Advanced Nuclear Reactor Approvals

Ronald Bailey | 2.5.2026 10:30 AM

'This Job Sucks'

Christian Britschgi | 2.5.2026 9:45 AM

Mike Johnson Wants To Spare ICE the Hassle of Getting the Right Warrant Before Forcibly Entering a Home

Damon Root | 2.5.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: You Can Check Out Any Time You Like, but You Can Never Leave

Charles Oliver | 2.5.2026 4:00 AM

Drug Dogs Should Not Be Unleashed To Authorize Apartment Searches, a SCOTUS Brief Argues

Jacob Sullum | 2.4.2026 4:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks