Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

The Italian Job

Michael Young | 6.26.2005 1:51 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

How many agents does it take to capture an Egyptian cleric living in Italy? 19. How much does it cost? Around $42,000, in one Milan hotel alone, followed by soujourns in Italian cities, or the Alps, once the job is done. Now we know why morale in the CIA has hit rock bottom.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Ink-Stained Retches

Michael Young is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (21)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. rey   21 years ago

    But who will be fired?

  2. kwais   21 years ago

    That is very embarassing. But I don't know if you can say from that story that you know why morale has hitten rock bottom. I mean, it appears that the agents were having a grand old time at taxpayers expense.

  3. Jim Henley   21 years ago

    It's like goldy and bronzey, only made of iron.

  4. tros   21 years ago

    I mean, it appears that the agents were having a grand old time at taxpayers expense.

    Except it's in the Washington Post now, so they are obligated to feel guilty about it. Also, I this gives us a working definition for "Key Ally In The War On Terror".

  5. Dave   21 years ago

    feel guilty about this incident, maybe...
    do it again, certainly...

  6. sim   21 years ago

    I had eight cops on me the last time I was pulled over for running a red light, plus the aid of a dispatcher. That they would need 19 agents to yank this guy off the street in Italian with some sort of stealth and ship him off to the ME isn't very shocking at all. And the pricetag of $42,000 doesn't even seem that high for govt work. How much should something like that cost? Anybody have a more reasonable estimate? Care to explain how you came up with it?

    Sure, whole deal may have been of questionable legality, but this would only mean it would likely take more manpower and money to do. When the govt makes something illegal, like foreign agents kidnapping and extradicting a religious leader, it tends to artificially run up the cost. Jesus, I thought this was a libertarian board, that's basic 101 right there.

    Dicker about the legality if you like, but crying about the price in money and manpower seems like you're missing the point.

  7. Dave   21 years ago

    $42,000 doesn't even seem that high for govt work.

    Reread the post again that was the bill for one hotel. The point here is that when you are spending money that is not yours on things for yourself what is gained by being frugal?

  8. Adam   21 years ago

    It was $42,000 for seven people...I'd like to know more about why the identities they assumed necessitated a lavish lifestyle, but how can anyone flat-out reject the possibility with the information provided in the article? The details are sketchy at best.

  9. DnB   21 years ago

    $42,000? That's a lot of donuts, even in Italy. Oh, for seven agents. That explains it.

  10. tros   21 years ago

    The point here is that when you are spending money that is not yours on things for yourself what is gained by being frugal?

    Yeah! That's the sort of thing that turns upper middle class "liberal" children into "hippies" when their parents pay them for good grades. In college they find themselves unable to get a job, and everyone thinks their killing their brain with all those "drugs".

  11. narciso   21 years ago

    More interesting is which reporter will be put before Pat Fitgerald''s grand jury. After all
    how many '51 year Honduran born station chief's under political or consular cover, have served
    in Rome. They didn't name him, but they did every
    thing but; they burned yet another source; will
    Cannistraro and Johnson, McGovern et al; cry foul;
    how about Krugman, Kristoff and co. These folks
    are starting to make Linda Foley's and Sra. Guilena suggestion, seem probable

  12. Jim Henley   21 years ago

    They didn't name him, but they did every
    thing but; they burned yet another source; will
    Cannistraro and Johnson, McGovern et al; cry foul;
    how about Krugman, Kristoff and co.

    Corriere Della Serra already named the CIA station chief and the other dozen indictees. The American papers are complying with the letter of the Agee Law, but to no purpose: that cat is now a formerly bagged cat.

  13. Ken Shultz   21 years ago

    "Opposition politicians in Rome have asked the parliamentary intelligence oversight committee to question Interior Minister Giuseppe Pisanu and Defense Minister Antonio Martino about whether they were aware of and had approved the operation, known in CIA parlance as an "extraordinary rendition."

    I'm curious as to what extent, if any, Berlusconi was complicit in this.

  14. wlpeak   21 years ago

    What a crock.
    The entire story is sourced from the Italian Court and everyone just assumes it must be true.
    They must be CIA because....well....The Italians said so!

    And Oriana Fallaci must be a racist! 'cause, well, she said mean things about Islam.

    I hate to break it to you all but this evidence is not. Oh, and FYI, just because it might seem to be advantagous to the US to capture this thug, doesn't mean the US did the grab. We have plenty of allies out there. And even if the US did it, the CIA isn't the only organization that does this sort of thing.

    Anyway it begs the question, the CIA they can find but terrorists...

  15. Mr. Nice Guy   21 years ago

    I don't know why this is an issue. Bentlys retrofitted with secret technology don't come cheap, you know, and Q is always pissed off that they aren't returned in one piece, if at all.

  16. R C Dean   21 years ago

    I thought "extraordinary rendition" was when we use clandestine means to dump terrorists on other countries, not when we use clandestine means to grab terrorists from other countries.

  17. zach   21 years ago

    i tend to believe that the italians are full of shit by default.

    anyway kwais, i think he was being sarcastic about the morale thing...

  18. zach   21 years ago

    also, as jealous as i am about the use of my tax dollars, i would rather they be spent on something like this than given to terrorists as ransom.

  19. gaius marius   21 years ago

    I thought "extraordinary rendition" was when we use clandestine means to dump terrorists on other countries, not when we use clandestine means to grab terrorists from other countries.

    usually, mr dean, the grabbing is part 1, the dumping part 2.

    mr wlpeak, the cia makes no bones about extraordinary rendition -- which is no longer extraordinary, by some measures. it's a post-9/11 strategy. it's up to the reader, i suppose, to judge whether or not america should be disappearing people a la the good old totalitarian fear states of old.

  20. zach   21 years ago

    since we never, ever did it during the cold war.

  21. Peter K.   21 years ago

    i tend to believe that the italians are full of shit by default.

    I see no reason not to trust the Italians on this.

    (Although for some reason, the mere mention of Italians always bring to mind a guy riding around on a scooter saying "Ciao".)

    Opponent of the Iraq War, former CIA employee, and author of Imperial Hubris, Michael "Anonymous" Scheuer thinks renditions are a great idea and work wonderfully. He's wrong on both accounts.

    I believe it was Justice Louis Brandeis who said governments that break laws breed contempt for law.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Affordability' Politics Is a Major Opening for the Free Market Message in the New Year

Christian Britschgi | 12.31.2025 3:35 PM

If You Give a Bear a Badge, Will It Respect Your Rights?

Jacob Sullum | 12.31.2025 3:10 PM

The Big Lesson of the 2020s? Don't Ignore the Economists.

Eric Boehm | 12.31.2025 1:00 PM

Study: Short-Form Video Isn't Rotting Your Brain

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 12.31.2025 12:24 PM

DHS Says REAL ID, Which DHS Certifies, Is Too Unreliable To Confirm U.S. Citizenship

C.J. Ciaramella | 12.31.2025 12:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks