The Institute for Justice reports that the Supreme Court today vacated a 2004 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit that said the "Got Milk?" advertising campaign violates the First Amendment rights of dairy farmers who are forced to pay for it even though they object to the message that all milk is pretty much the same. The reversal was expected in the wake of last week's Supreme Court decision upholding the "Beef: It's What's for Dinner" campaign–although it was not inconceivable that, after ruling in 1997 that forcibly funded peach ads were constitutional, deciding in 2001 that generic mushroom ads were unconstitutional, and determining last week that beef-boosting ads were constitutional, the Court would change its mind yet again.
Woman Sentenced to 12 Years in Prison for Selling $31 of Marijuana Lands Back in Jail for Court Fees
Fines continued to pile up for almost a decade.
Plus: Attacks on Saudi Arabia unlikely to raise U.S. oil prices
Comedy, meet cancel culture
Brett Kavanaugh Faces a New Accusation in The New York Times, but the Alleged Victim Didn't Confirm It
Plus: Andrew Yang opts out of cancel culture, Andrew Cuomo wants to crack down on flavored e-cigarettes, and more...
"Controlled choice" is supposed to fix inequality in New York public schools. It might make everything worse.