Free As In Talking Beer
In Technology Review, Lawrence Lessig and Richard Epstein are debating intellectual property, free software, and digital rights management.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is just one essay. After about five minutes of trying to figure out where the rest of the debate is, I gave up. For a technology magazine, these folks sure do have piss-poor navigation on their site.
SP: There's three links in my post, each going to a different essay.
Sandy,
The "freedom" to be required to put my changes back into the commons?
Only if you wish to distribute the work you derived from already GnuGPL-covered code. If you don't like those terms, don't derive work from GnuGPL-covered code. It's copyrighted, not patented, so it shouldn't be too hard coming up with your own implementation, maybe even by translating the algorithm to another computer language. Because you can look at the code, it may even be able to give you ideas that you wouldn't have with proprietary solutions.