Another Difference Between American Newspapers and British Newspapers
My local daily would never begin an article with the phrase, "The strange case of the homosexual necrophiliac duck."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Read it here:
http://www.nmr.nl/DSA8-243.pdf
Not even the New York Post?
"When Wild Animals Go Wilding."
Sounds like these ducks must watch an awful lot of porn.
If I had the story, I would not hesitate to write that lede.
My editor may not see the humor, though.
Somewhere, someone is masturbating to this article.
Jeffrey Dahmer has been reincarnated as a duck.
Homosexuality does not exist in animals! It runs counter to biological programming and/or God's will! Only deviant humans are capable of *choosing* sick sexual practices! La! La! La! I can't hear you!
Actually, Hysterical, we've known about gay seagulls for decades.
Oops, wrong link! And slanderous, too, as far as I know -- that's just the way hip musicians looked in the 'Eighties.
Time magazine article about gay seagulls. Lesbian, to be specific. That's right -- "hot lesbo gull-on-gull action!"
Oh, crap! Now my Fly United poster is rape-porn.
Kevin