Take It With a Grain of Salt
The Center for Science in the Public Interest has filed a lawsuit demanding that the Food and Drug Administration stop treating salt as an ingredient "generally recognized as safe." CSPI wants the FDA to force food manufacturers to reduce the salt content of their products. It also wants the government to require conspicuous warning labels for foods with high salt content and force restaurants to disclose the amounts of salt in their dishes.
CSPI calls salt a "silent killer," blaming it for 150,000 deaths a year. But as Steve Milloy, proprietor of junkscience.com, noted last year, the science concerning salt's impact on hypertension remains equivocal, and there is scant evidence that the general population would benefit from consuming less. Gary Taubes reviewed the long-running debate over salt's health effects in a 1998 Science article that is still well worth reading.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
[I]CSPI wants the FDA to [B]force[/B] food manufacturers to reduce the salt content of their products.[/I]
Wow, jumping right past the labels and just forcing them to stop using it, that would change the way foods taste, what ever happened to just encouraging people to exercise?
CSPI wants the FDA to force food manufacturers to reduce the salt content of their products. (I wanted to put the quote in italics and 'force' in bold, but standard html tags don't work?)
Wow, jumping right past the labels and just forcing them to stop using it, that would change the way foods taste, what ever happened to just encouraging people to exercise?
In the future:
The Center for Science in the Public Interest has filed a lawsuit demanding that the Food and Drug Administration stop treating beef as an ingredient "generally recognized as safe."
The Center for Science in the Public Interest has filed a lawsuit demanding that the Food and Drug Administration stop treating egg as an ingredient "generally recognized as safe."
dante - try using lower case i's and b's inside the brackets.
Case doesn't matter. But you have to use greater-than and lesser-than symbols instead of brackets.
Also, use "" instead of brackets.
Thanks, Jesse. I was trying to enclose the greater-than and less-than symbols in quotes. I should have known better.
If all food is regulated to taste bad, we'll solve our obesity problem. Or we could make furniture uncomfortable, forcing people to move around. Or maybe eliminating all electric appliances and pretty much anything with a motor...hand-wrung laundry and walk to your job swinging a pick.
So much pleasure to reduce, so little time.
Remember sodium and chlorine from high school chemistry?
Any combination could NOT be fit for human consumption!
Plus, if you examine salt carefully, it has sharp corners and edges!
wooo!
Oops, I didn't say what I meant to say, even as I was typing the correct thing. Didn't get much sleep last night. :/
I've got some nice NaCl rocks for sale -- only $5 a gram. The best stuff, smuggled in from Canada -- you won't fine purer sodium choride this side of the border. Your taste buds will explode.
Also available: Hand-blown glass shakers, blue with a white umbrella painted on.
joe will undoubtedly show up and accuse us of dismissing the risks of salt because the nannies on the other side are upset about it. Not quite so:
I recall reading an issue of Science several years ago that had an article on salt. The basic gist seemed to be that there was no consensus: It certainly wouldn't hurt to err on the side of caution and limit your sodium if you're worried about hypertension, but there's no smoking gun data in favor of the NaCl-hypertension link.
I don't think it's very useful to quote Steve Milloy's material. He's got some funny ideas about statistics and epidemiology. He debunks a lot of bad science, but he mixes that with attacks on scientific studies that reflect poorly on many industrial interests. This makes his stuff unconvincing in an argument.
Guither, Just don't sell that stuff in 'Jersey, that's my corner.
YO! Nickle bags here! Nickles!
Purest crystals on the planet!, All natural!, Organic!, harvested from the sea in Atlantic City by oppressed gamblers seeking carfare home.
I can see it now. Special licenses for tropical fish stores and public aquariums, with barbed wire fences and gaurds to keep out undesirables, import restrictions, gaurded convoys, etc. Just like they do for Coca leaves and the byproducts in and out of that plant in Maywood, NJ. that is licensed to import and process the stuff for pharaceuticals and cola flavoring.
Wait'll they get to chocolate, then you'll REALLY see a rebellion!
HAH!
Tom
Did the CSPI skip health class the day the teacher told them that salt can be found in the cuisine of all human cultures, because it is a biological necessity?
Watch your coffee, tea, and softdrinks!!! If CSPI is going after salt, no doubt caffeine is next. Talk about your buzzkill.
And why haven't they forced the FDA to list a bacon cheeseburger as a "cholesterol delivery device" yet?
Paging Mr. Bahnzaf...
Rob
Hey, how come so many dangers are known as "the silent killer"? How come we never hear about the dangers of:
Chainsaw Juggling: The Noisy Killer
The Center for Science in the Public Interest's new slogan:
"Food kills."
joe will undoubtedly show up and accuse us of dismissing the risks of salt because the nannies on the other side are upset about it.
Ah, yes. The foodnannies are coming to scold us again. Where's Evan Williams when you need him?
I call dibs on "The Foodnannies" for my band name. It's offically in writing now.
I can't believe they are wasting their time on salt when they could be going after the biggest killer of all -- oxygen.
(1) Most food I buy already lists the salt content.
(2) If they reduce the salt content, people will just reach for the salt shaker.
The Burger Abuse enforcement regime may not be that far away. (parody)
>>we could make furniture uncomfortable, forcing people to move around. Or maybe eliminating all electric appliances and pretty much anything with a motor...
I was discussing "food addiction" with a friend of mine in a carpool yesterday. Radio ad: "I was addicted to food. Then I took wonderdrug X, and now... (good things happen)."
Come to think of it, if I don't it food, I get irratible and weak, and eventually die. Yeah, it wouldn't suprise me to see the CSPI go on a "food kills" campaign, with TV ads like the TRUTH ads against smoking.
Seriously though, what motivates CSPI? Do they just think all of these things are seriously bad for people, or is there some industry they are backing by going after everyone else?
Look, just skip to the logical end and pass a law saying you must get a government permit in order to die. Anyone not getting such a permit must pay a huge fine. The permit is good for only 30 days, so if you don't die in that period, you must re-file. Such a burdonsome and punitive system would surely deter most deaths.
There. Problem solved.
What I want to know is when are they going to do something about dihydrogen monoxide. Not only hasn't this subtstance been linked to obesity and poor health, it has been found in a large percentage of violent felons. This is a dangerous substance and I think the Federal government should develop a large beauracracy to control it.
I refuse to listen to these guys about salt until then can tell me for certain if eggs are bad or good for you. Those Egg Council guys have my head spinning.
The Center for Science in the Public Interest's new slogan:
"Food kills."
Comment by: Franklin Harris at February 25, 2005 02:06 PM
Franklin, you must learn to be as subtle as our bureaucratic friends.
Phrase it this way:
Food is a gateway drug. It leads to the consumption of liquids, especially if the aforementioned food has too much salt.
Rarely has any human, observed to be consuming food and the, as it were, harder stuff, liquid, survived more than 120 years.
Jennifer,
Did you ever take a lick at one of those 10 by 10 inch blocks put out for cattle?
I have, and I think my tongue was too smoothe and sissy and homo sapiens to get the full effect.
Still I could see how cattle could get into it.
For them, though it is a "box," it is thinking outside their box.
From their point of view, it's grass... been there, done that. I'm gonna put my tongue upside that yellowish thing and see if it sticks. I really don't care...
Bovine saltilinguious.
How is this going to affect the regulation of cum-swallowing? It's salty you know....