Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Who?

Charles Paul Freund | 2.9.2005 6:29 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

He "says he 'admires' Newt Gingrich more than Bill Clinton." He thinks that "Christian-right big Ralph Reed 'created a real success' with the right." He believes that "Clinton led the Dems into complacency and defeat." So who is this guy? Hint: He's pro-gun and a budget balancer, too. Give up?

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: A New Kind of Mandatory Belt Law

Charles Paul Freund is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (11)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Ira Weatheral   21 years ago

    Without looking, I'd guess Dean.

  2. Ken Shultz   21 years ago

    EEEEeeeEERRRrrrrrRRRAAAaaaaaaaaAAAhhhhhhhhhhHHHhhhh!

  3. jimmy   21 years ago

    how come nobody has ever mentioned that dean raised more campaign money on the internet than anyone ever had, but had squandered virtually all of it before the new hampshire primary was even held? if the dems want someone like that to run their party apparatus, who am i to complain?

  4. Pavel   21 years ago

    "All I can say is, the Democratic Party is clearly endorsing doctor-assisted suicide"

    Heh!

    Even if it was true, it beats their current focus-group driven suicide by a longshot.

  5. Henry   21 years ago

    Judging by his enemies, he must have SOMETHING going for him.

    What it is, I don't know.

  6. Douglas Fletcher   21 years ago

    Everyone else knows that cleaning up the stables Terry McAuliffe is leaving behind is just a shitty job.

  7. joe   21 years ago

    jimmy, at one time, Dean was not just leading in the polls, but dominating. Given that situation, his smartest strategy was to go for inevitability - to put the race away before anyone voted. He came close, too.

    So no, I don't think his heavy front-loading of his spending is necesarily proof that he doesn't know how to run a campaign.

  8. Larry A   21 years ago

    Pro-gun? Maybe Dean's "moderate," for a Democrat. But "pro?"

    Anyone who can claim that Maryland has a high crime rate, and therefore needs tough gun control, is ignoring the fact that Maryland has prided itself in having the toughest gun control of the fifty states for the last two or three decades. And it still isn't working. Only a true believer in the mantra that gun control prevents crime could use Maryland's example with a straight face.

    The other half of Dean's policy is that Vermont has a low crime rate, therefore the government can "allow" the state to have "lax" gun control. Hardly a ringing endorsement of the Second Amendment.

    Never mind that, if gun control is necessary to control crime why does Vermont, which has always had "lax" gun control, continue to have one of the lowest crime rates in the nation?

    Judging by his favorite talking point, Howard Dean is not reasonable on gun control, if you define "reasonable" as "using reason."

  9. Stevo Darkly   21 years ago

    Judging by his enemies, he must have SOMETHING going for him. .... What it is, I don't know.

    I will say this: The man makes one hell of an onion dip.

    http://www.deansdips.com/

  10. David T   21 years ago

    He was also pro-NAFTA (much as he tried to explain that away during the 2004 campaign). And unlike John Kerry, he backed the *first* Gulf war. Oh, and in 2000 he denounced the caucus system for strengthening "the extremes" in both parties.

    So who is the "real" Howard Dean--the centrist governor of Vermont in the 1990s, or the favorite of the antiwar Left in the 2004 primaries? I suppose he would argue that there is no contradiction, and indeed one does not have to be a left-winger to oppose the war in Iraq. But the problem is that *within the Democratic Party as of 2003* the people who hated Bush for the war tended to be left-wing on other issues as well, so Dean to appeal to them basically ran way from or tried to explain away the more "conservative" aspects of his governorship, and started bashing the DLC--which previously had regarded him very favorably.

  11. Morat   21 years ago

    David T: You might be better off actually asking far left liberals why a fairly conservative Democrat appealed to them.

    I'll give you a hint: It starts with "B" and ends in "alls".

    I knew a LOT of damn near Green party Dems that loved Dean, and a bunch of "I'd vote Republican if they weren't so hung up on sex" conservative Dems that loved Dean.

    Dean appealed to the left by standing up against the War -- not "war in general" but the "crock of lying shit Bush sold, that everyone knew was shit, but that spineless Dems voted for anyways". The pacifists were voting for Kuninich. The conservatives liked him because they frankly believed he'd do his damndest to straighten out the fiscal mess Bush left.

    The rest of us just liked him because it was refreshing to see a Democrat trying to kick a Republican's ass instead of kissing it.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's 'Great Healthcare Plan' Has Promise but Should Add More Freedom for Americans

J.D. Tuccille | 1.19.2026 7:00 AM

This 1996 Law Protects Free Speech Online. Does It Apply to AI Too?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the February/March 2026 issue

Brickbat: Don't Look Down Under

Charles Oliver | 1.19.2026 4:00 AM

How the FCC Became the Speech Police

Jacob Sullum | From the February/March 2026 issue

Why Can't New York Get Rid of 2-Person Subway Crews?

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 1.17.2026 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks