How Things Might Go Wrong
The CIA's National Intelligence Council has put out its forecast on the world circa 2020, entitled Mapping the Global Future. I've only skimmed the interesting read, but I was struck by a pessimistic passage that Matthew Yglesias flagged:
A slow-down could result from a pervasive sense of economic and physical insecurity that led governments to put controls on the flow of capital, goods, people, and technology that stalled economic growth. Such a situation could come about in response to terrorist attacks killing tens or even hundreds of thousands in several US cities or in Europe or to widespread cyber attacks on information technology. Border controls and restrictions on technology exchanges would increase economic transaction costs and hinder innovation and economic growth. Other developments that could stimulate similar restrictive policies include a popular backlash against globalization prompted, perhaps, by white collar rejection of outsourcing in the wealthy countries and/or resistance in poor countries whose peoples saw themselves as victims of globalization.
Emphasis in original. I'm not so worried about "widespread cyber attacks" or "white collar rejection of outsourcing," but you don't need to be a pessimist to imagine there'll be another horrible terrorist attack one of these years.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
...led governments to put controls on the flow of capital, goods, people, and technology that stalled economic growth.
Not to beat the deadhorse of historical analogies, but my basic theory of the Roman Empire's collapse is based on the economic measures that came in the 200s which limited these very things. 🙂
Whatever. I'm moving the hell out to Montana.
The state of CT just had a false EAS alarm telling everyone to evac the state. Fun.
Sounds like loads of fun, Jeff!
"Attention, residents of Connecticut. Please panic and clog all outgoing major roadways immediately."
Yeah, that wouldn't be a disaster.
Having driven through CT, I'm confident it's an attempt to boose ticket revenue.
Wow. The fake CT evacuation may be the funniest thing I've seen so far in 2005.
http://www.wfsb.com/Global/story.asp?S=2886640
Who says Connecticut was boring??
Anyone read Richard Clark's article in this month's Atlantic?
my basic theory of the Roman Empire's collapse is based on the economic measures that came in the 200s which limited these very things. 🙂
which were similarly made desirable by a wider mindset among the roman people, imo, that was exactly a pervasive sense of economic and physical insecurity. how very interesting and sad.
If there ever is a nuclear attack on Europe or the U.S., we can kiss our civil freedoms goodbye. If freedom is viewed as a suicide pact, the people will willingly, in fact demand, to give up their freedoms. Preventing such an attack is absolutely essential to maintaining a free society.
John,
The whole Constitution not being a "suicide pact" explained here: http://slate.msn.com/id/2060342
I'm not so worried about "widespread cyber attacks" or "white collar rejection of outsourcing,"
I'll join you on the widespread cyber attacks, because I've seen the skills of your average Islamic IT pro, and until Microsoft comes out with a "Bring Down the IntarWeb" wizard, they're not going to do much damage.
But you're not worried about white collar rejection of outsourcing? I argue against rejection of outsourcing every day (as a public matter, for private companies I generally point out that offshoring, at least, puts more of a burden on management than they're used to), but that doesn't stop me worrying about failing in that effort.
Smoot-Hawley passed just after one of the freest parts of our history. I'd love to hear an argument of why that can't happen again, but it deserves more at this point than a passing mention.
I don't know, I'm still waiting for the year 1960 to happen like they said it would at the New York World's Fair (1933?).
I think the reason Rome collapsed is that they began turning into Italians.
The New York World's Fair was 1939.
I went to the one in 1964. It had more of the same.
Yeah, where are the flying cars?