Polling Palestinians
As we've recently been reminded, there's no such thing as a perfect opinion poll, even in an over-polled society like ours. Accurate polling can present even greater challenges in the Middle East, however, and the more democratic events that occur in the region, the more those problems will matter. The story of the election of Mahmoud Abbas to the presidency of the PA, for example, featured as a subplot his failure to beat the exit-poll spread.
In the Middle East (and elsewhere), the widespread phenomenon of preference falsification can be exacerbated by cultural behavior. Many Arabs regard it as a matter of politesse to tell interlocutors what they want to hear. This is not necessarily an issue of telling or hiding the truth, but a reflection of circumspection, a response intended to put people at their ease and help maintain an easy social exchange. Whatever the motivation, however, it rather complicates the issue of measuring actual public opinion.
That's what made the last pre-election poll by The Palestinian Center for Public Opinion interesting: PCPO sought a way around opinion circumspection. According to the Center's director, Dr. Nabil Kukali (quoted in a PCPO email on Jan. 7), "response to the poll question about the choice of the presidential candidate was conducted in a secret way. The respondents were [given a 'ballot' and] asked to put a mark on the right side of the candidate's name and to drop the 'voting-sheet' into a closed box, specially designed for that purpose. Every respondent was requested to vote honestly in the same intent as he/she would do on Sunday, the 9th of January, i.e. on the Election Day. The poll is said to be considered as pre-voting."
It appeared to be a clever idea, but something went wrong. The PCPO poll, released Jan. 7, measured Mahmoud Abbas' support at only 51.8 percent, more than 10 percentage points below his reported percentage of votes two days later in the actual election. (I am assuming the election and vote count to have been honest and accurate, since I have no reason not to.) Anyway, back to the ME opinion drawing board. In the meantime, people continue to cite and argue over poll results in the region, especially in Iraq, as if those results meant something. Maybe sometimes they do, and sometimes maybe not.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe the 10% voted differently because there were fears that votes for the actual election wouldn't be as safe to have a differing opinion as the poll. Just a thought.
I'm in the habit of falsifying just about any poll I'm asked to participate in (unless there are likely criminal sanctions).
I guess I look at it like it's not just OK, but appropriate, to lie to some super-powerful institution asking questions to which they don't need to know the answer.
Of course my wife doesn't quite see it that way. She expects me to always be truthful to at least one super-powerful institution.
Let's take a poll: How many of you lie when asked to participate in a poll?
😉
Let's take a poll: How many of you lie when asked to participate in a poll?
I usually choose the most outlandish repsonse, which, is tougher to do now that polling has because so black and white.
It used to be much easier to eff around with the pollsters.
Was Zogby involved in any of this?
There is no such thing as public opinion. There are votes, but that's not public opinion either. Votes have whatever effect they're meant to have, not an opinion.
Public opinion is a fiction, like the ``comfort'' that they measure in car commercials.
The media like it.
cdunlea, Did you ask because Zogby is muslim? Perhaps he would be the pollster to figure out how to ask a question in a neutral fashion that will get unguarded answers.
Personally, I think it would take years of cultural change.
Zogby, like 75 percent of Arab Americans, is Christian.
No, I wasn't aware about his religion. I only was commenting because of his exit polling predictions like Kerry winning the election with 310 EVs.
Maybe I'm cynical, but I'd put the difference down to ballot-stuffing.
Meaning Abbas is the legitimate victor, but his margin of victory is illegitimately inflated.
Just a theory.
Eight out of ten people have never been surveyed.