Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

But Which One Is He Endorsing?

Tim Cavanaugh | 10.29.2004 7:10 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Transcript of bin Laden's pre-election pitch. Reaction from Bush. Reaction from Kerry. Blast from the past moment: This whole thing is about the U.S.S. New Jersey?

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Praising Us Violates IP!

Tim Cavanaugh
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (20)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Ruthless   21 years ago

    From Whack-O-Sama's point of view, he just wants to be understood.
    Should we be asking whether he prefers Prince Bandar over Prince Ali Baba?
    All here should be so fortunate as moi to have a friend by the name of Abdul.
    Whack-O-Sama is stating his grievances as clearly as anyone here can. Somewhere, other than al Jazeera, the "enemy" needs to start on the road to de-demonification.
    He's reaching out for Christsakes!

  2. Bill   21 years ago

    It does seem like Osama is reaching out. It's so weird! He must see how a murderous bastard like Arafat became loved by so many. Maybe he's trying to be the next terrorist-turned-euro-celebrity.

  3. Fodderstompf   21 years ago

    If I recall correctly, this blog has a commenter or two who knew that the bearded one was dead. Would they like to comment on the news?

  4. Gorp   21 years ago

    I haven't commented on bin Laden before but I figured it was 98% certain the scumbag was dead. How sure are we that the tape is authentic? It sure as hell doesn't sound like any of his previous utterances, either in style or in substance.

  5. Ruthless   21 years ago

    Da Woild According to...

    Give it up Gorp.

    Back to what passes for your drarrwing board.

  6. Curtis   21 years ago

    If he's "reaching out" as some suggest, the question is: why? This was not a strong statement either in language or tone (given the norm). It actually seems that he's hoping to backtrack a bit. I think he gets it now that the twin tower attack unleashed a relentless hound in the USA, which he may not have fully expected. All guesswork, btw.

  7. Curtis   21 years ago

    For what it's worth (more subjective, sheer speculation), my reaction to the tape, and upon reading the transcript that didn't change, was that he had shown a great sign of weakness.

  8. Al Franken   21 years ago

    He's not a bad person, gosh darn it!
    He's smart. Islamists like him, and he just wants to be loved.

  9. Curtis   21 years ago

    Sorry, Tim, but I neglected to address the question. OBL spoke more of Bush (all of which was negative) and that likely means Kerry would be the lesser evil, but Bush can't really use the "endorsement" to his advantage and neither can Kerry. For all we know, another attack is on the way before the elections. OBL is basically appealing to the US public and is saying neither of these fellows is doing the right job by you.

  10. Jon   21 years ago

    Maybe he's endorsing Nader.

  11. crimethink   21 years ago

    Is anyone here cynical enough to not be surprised when HS raises the threat level to red for schools, churches, and govt buildings in large cities on Nov 2? 😉

  12. Crazy Fear Monger   21 years ago

    Or another attack is on the way after the election - as "punishment".

  13. Gorp   21 years ago

    Ruthless

    Have you seen the tape? Seriously, how sure are we that the tape is authentic? We've had numerous bogus audio tapes before. Has it been authenticated yet by impartial experts?

  14. berg   21 years ago

    I thought Bush's response was more dignified than Kerry's. Kerry is getting quite comical with his, "I will personally hunt down and strangle every terrorist" line, especially in combination with his other "We must form coalitions with France, Germany and the rest of the world" position.

  15. Mike G   21 years ago

    I have seen reports that it's fuzzy and entirely in longshot, which means that it could well be dubbed-- or a double. I think the rush to assume it IS him is a bit premature. Maybe it is, maybe the odds even favor that position-- but given the history of fakery of messages from him so far, why should we blindly assume it has now stopped? I mean, Laurence Olivier was just in a Hollywood movie....

  16. chilly   21 years ago

    This totally helps Bush. This is the October Surprise everyone was waiting for. UBL WANTS Bush elected. Why? Because Bush will continue to invade muslim countries (Syria anyone?) and kill muslim citizens. This is EXACTLY what UBL wants. At the same time Bush will be destroying our freedoms here at home. It's the same reason Bush doesn't really want to catch UBL. They need each other. It's a classic co-dependent relationship. BTW, I think Kerry sux too.

  17. Curtis   21 years ago

    CFM makes a good point. (I'm not convinced that the whole thing is authentic, but it "appears" to be.) The "conciliatory" approach could well be followed by an attack as punishment. OBL ain't a nice guy -- I'm not about to sit at a table and "reason" with him.

  18. boyroy   21 years ago

    Osama has to be for Bush. Bush provides the Christian Crusader Osama needs to fight. Hard to promote religious fanaticism without a fellow fanatic.

    With Kerry, America gets all reasonable with other countries and goes back to exporting your seductive civilization. Look at Europe, China, and India, most of the population of the world, remove a few ethnic twists, and you got the States. Muslims bombing around in SUVs exchanging text messages with the hotty two lanes over aren't going to be big on strapping on gelignite and heading out to the bar mitzvah.

    Coming from an oil rich region that is already really secular, gives me mixed feelings about the American election. I like Americans. The whole ugly American thing has been replaced by nice folks in RVs, who want to help me get satellite radio in Canada, and fellow business idiots, willing to compare company ethics programs. But oil over $50 a barrel, a government willing to let us steal your markets and bring hockey back home, gives me goose bumps.

  19. kwais   21 years ago

    Fodderstomp,
    I also didn't say so on the blog, but I was convinced that 1st Force had guides some bombs down on the cave where he was two years ago.

    I was wondering why they were keeping that shit a secret.

    Apparently I was wrong. Well, its not the first time.

  20. David Tomlin   21 years ago

    We know the tape is authentic because the White House says so, and they didn't waste any time.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Should the
Civilization Video Games Be Fun—or Real?

Jason Russell | From the June 2025 issue

Government Argues It's Too Much To Ask the FBI To Check the Address Before Blowing Up a Home

Billy Binion | 5.9.2025 5:01 PM

The U.K. Trade Deal Screws American Consumers

Eric Boehm | 5.9.2025 4:05 PM

A New Survey Suggests Illicit Opioid Use Is Much More Common Than the Government's Numbers Indicate

Jacob Sullum | 5.9.2025 3:50 PM

Judge Orders Tufts Grad Student Rumeysa Ozturk Be Released on Bail From Immigration Detention

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.9.2025 3:17 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!