Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Bargain Ban

Jacob Sullum | 10.5.2004 11:29 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Daniel Steiner, the Florida limo service operator who was punished for charging too little, has taken his case to federal court, arguing that Hillsborough County's regulations infringe upon his 14th Amendment right to earn a living.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Gatekeeper Anguish

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason. He is the author, most recently, of Beyond Control: Drug Prohibition, Gun Regulation, and the Search for Sensible Alternatives (Prometheus Books).

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (8)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. thoreau   21 years ago

    One interesting aspect to this story is that a lot of his business involves taking elderly disabled people to medical appointments. The cost of specialized transportation is a very real part of the cost of caring for the elderly and disabled, and so this case should be of interest to people who lament the lack of affordable care.

  2. thoreau   21 years ago

    NoStar-

    Good point. And by the time they were done making quality transport "affordable" the bills would probably be even higher than what this guy's competitors are currently charging.

    There's nothing so cheap and efficient that the gov't can't make it more expensive anyhow.

  3. BigPhil   21 years ago

    "... fighting the arbitrary dictates of local transportation regulators ..."

    I spend twelve years in various aspects of the taxicab business. You can't appreciate "arbitrary" until you meet a taxicab inspector.

  4. Tingy Wah   21 years ago

    Honestly, the Free State Project would be better off trying to populate, then completely de-regulate, a city or municipality. There's plenty of state shrinking to be done on a local level, and the goal of overwhelming an area with libertrians would be made easier.

  5. Mark Draughn   21 years ago

    BigPhil, tell us some stories.

  6. Curtis   21 years ago

    Thanks for a great item of true interest. This fellow has my strongest support. To bring from the link...
    "Sandefur added, "This case exemplifies the problem warned about by President Ronald Reagan when he observed that '(t)he Founding Fathers knew a government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they knew when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose.'" (((-- Citation: Ronald Reagan, Televised address to the nation, October 27, 1964.)))

    Sandefur noted that former Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas once called the fundamental right to earn a living to be "the most precious liberty that man possesses."

    Whenever a Daniel Steiner goes down in the face of bad law, the public suffers.

  7. NoStar   21 years ago

    Tingy Wah,
    I like your suggestion, but I have spent my adult life looking for a libertarian woman to procreate with. I am attracted to intelligent women, and that seems to be the problem. The ones I find attractive to are too intelligent to fall for a schmuck like me.

  8. Pro Libertate   21 years ago

    Gee, I'm so glad that the Big Guava is protecting me from myself so effectively--keeping me six feet away from dangerous women at nude bars, watching every move I make, every breath I take in Ybor City, and keeping limo drivers from introducing price competition into the Bay Area (that's the Tampa Bay Area for you terribly confused Californians).

    I like Tingy Wah's suggestion--there's an awful lot of craziness going on in municipalities around the country, and it would be a lot easier to affect what they are doing than to "take over" a state. Here, it would make sense just to get a libertarian into the City Attorney's office. For instance, the six-foot rule was blatantly unconstitutional at the time it was enacted and should've never gotten past the City Attorney. The city was saved the mucho dinero it would've lost violating the First Amendment by a rather surprising about-face by the U.S. Supreme Court. Too bad, really, because a few dollars ripped out of the coffers might've gotten their attention.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Judge Dismisses RICO Charges Against All 'Cop City' Defendants

Joe Lancaster | 9.9.2025 4:35 PM

Trump's 'Department of War' Rebrand Might Be His Most Honest Move Yet

Jacob R. Swartz | 9.9.2025 4:21 PM

Milei Coalition's Loss in Buenos Aires Calls Argentine Libertarian Movement's Strength Into Question

César Báez | 9.9.2025 4:00 PM

Hyundai Raid Shows Trump Can't Deport His Way To a Manufacturing Boom

Autumn Billings | 9.9.2025 3:00 PM

The GAIN AI Act Looks More Like Protectionism Than National Security

Tosin Akintola | 9.9.2025 2:45 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300