Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Sampling Error

Julian Sanchez | 9.8.2004 4:47 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has ruled that sampling is illegal, even when the sample in question is an essentially unrecognizable snippet. The case at issue here involved a two-second, three-note P-Funk lick that had been altered and looped.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Is "the al-Qaeda throne" Empty?

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (21)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. anonymous coward   21 years ago

    Well, that does it. Everything that’s happened over the past few years, I was ready to put up with, but this is too damned far. It’s time for violent revolution. B-boys of the world, unite!

    P.S. I’d settle for Californian secession in a pinch.

  2. isildur   21 years ago

    Doesn’t this have wider implications for all derivative art? I saw an exhibit once that was a large novel that had almost every line of every page burned away. The artistic merit was questionable, but it seems like this ruling suggests that even that piece would be illegal.

    I’m sure there are countless other examples of derived art; do they now all become illegal?

  3. Pavel   21 years ago

    Well it’s about time. Those negroes have been getting away with stealing the white man’s music for far too long.

  4. Patrick   21 years ago

    Oh well. There goes industrial & industrial dance music (i.e. a huge majority of what I listen to).

  5. Patrick   21 years ago

    Doesn’t this have wider implications for all derivative art?

    Good point. Most literature steals themes and sometimes direct words from previous literature.

  6. Jason Ligon   21 years ago

    I think the decision said sampling was okay as long as appropriately obvious props are given.
    Props in the form of a shout-out have been designated ‘safe-harbor’.

    The P-diddy clause, I think.

  7. Patrick   21 years ago

    I’m sure the only acceptable props is a large check made out to the record company?

  8. clarityiniowa   21 years ago

    “Derivative” is a polite term for electronically cutting and pasting actual passages from someone else’s creation and selling it as original. Frankly, I would rather see rappers, hip-hop artists and purveyors of other forms of electronica having to come up with their own beats as opposed to stealing someone else’s.

    The epitome of sampling was Vanilla Ice’s tragic “Ice, Ice Baby.” The David Bowie/Freddy Mercury cut “Under Pressure” from which the hook for that travesty was taken isn’t among my favorite pieces of music, but it was hauled several hundred rungs down the dignity ladder by the audio theft of the signature bass line and piano riff. It is significant that even Mr. Van Winkle himself, now in retirement, appears to be embarrassed by his former crime.

  9. clarityiniowa   21 years ago

    I assume you avid bloggers wouldn’t mind me cutting and pasting entire passages from your best work without attribution and foisting them off on an unsuspecting public as my own work, hmmm?

  10. clarityiniowa   21 years ago

    Finally, consider Rick James’ “Superfreak.” Having been liberally sampled for both “Der Komissar” and MC Hammer’s “You Can’t Touch This,” it would seem in retrospect that all the artists involved in that three-way transaction have come to bad ends. Coincidence? I think not.

  11. J1   21 years ago

    To Patrick:

    I hear ya. Bye Bye Skinny Puppy and Frontline Assembly.

  12. J1   21 years ago

    Forgot to add:

    Industrial bands were sampling WAY before Hip-Hop and Rap, but they were using movie dialogue and sounds rather than other pieces of music. Throbbing Gristle et. al. were sampling in the 70’s.

    J1

  13. Greg   21 years ago

    I assume you avid bloggers wouldn’t mind me cutting and pasting entire passages from your best work without attribution and foisting them off on an unsuspecting public as my own work, hmmm?

    Attribution is entirely irrelevant to copyright law. What you’re describing is an ethical issue called plagiarism. Plagiarism is not a crime however.

    Oh, and oops, I seem to have just done what you described. Should I be guilty of copyright violation now?

    For more information on this topic read up on your history:

    http://www.negativland.com/intprop.html

  14. Neb Okla   21 years ago

    I guess we won’t be seeing any more quotes of previous court rulings in new court rulings anymore…

  15. Ernie Longmire   21 years ago

    Falco’s “Der Kommissar” doesn’t sample “Super Freak”, and I don’t think After The Fire’s cover does either…here, let me check…spinning up the ol’ iPod here…nope, it doesn’t. It’s just a similar bassline. Falco didn’t sample much, and certainly not during the Ponger years (81/82). Hell, hardly anyone outside of hip-hop did back then — white folks didn’t catch the bug until they could do it by pushing buttons and a Fairlight rig would have set you back deep into six figures at the time.

    Plus M.C. Hammer got Rick James’ permission for the sample he used on “Can’t Touch This”, so *ppphphpt*.

  16. Only Ed   21 years ago

    Jeesuz H, what the hell is so hard about making your own damn music? What does it say about the alleged artist (and his fans) when the alleged artist lifts not a theme or idea but the actual sound waves? He’s no better than the collage (so-called) artist who cuts out cheaply printed snippets of Masters’ reproductions, glues them to a board and then has the balls to call it “original.” The practice of sampling the work of others is nothing more than a moral and intellectual shortcut practiced by tech-savy hoodlums who haven’t a shred of originality. They are aided and abetted by a lazy culture that can’t be bothered with highfalutin notions of “artistic integrity.”

    Oh well, we get the entertainment we deserve.

  17. Andy   21 years ago

    This ruling will have no long-term effects even in Tennessee, let alone nationally, IMHO.

    B-boys of the world unite. This rulin’ goin’ down!

  18. Malak,   21 years ago

    So I guess Les Nessman WAS right. Every rock-n-roller ought to send 10% of their royalties directly to Chuck Berry as compensation for ripping him off . . .

  19. speedwell   21 years ago

    Bach, Beethoven, Haydn, Mozart… all a bunch of crummy no-talent hoodlums who ripped off each other’s music.

  20. joe   21 years ago

    “I assume you avid bloggers wouldn’t mind me cutting and pasting entire passages from your best work without attribution and foisting them off on an unsuspecting public as my own work, hmmm?”

    Which is such an apt comparison. Imagine, someone in Iowa not knowing anything about hip hop and electroninc music!

  21. dhex   21 years ago

    gee, you think?

    if only ed can explain how a sampler works, i’ll cut him some slack (there are legitimate criticisms of the puffy school of pay as you play)

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Tariffs Are Breaking the Manufacturing Industries Trump Says He Wants To Protect

Eric Boehm | From the July 2025 issue

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!