Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

John Banzhaf's Head Just Exploded

Julian Sanchez | 7.23.2004 2:09 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Drinkable donut.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Door-to-Door Felons

Julian Sanchez is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (21)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Dylan   21 years ago

    John Banzaf Your Head A Splode

  2. thoreau   21 years ago

    Head exploding?

    Isn’t the sort of thing that Banzhaf feeds on? (pun intended) Now he has one more target for lawsuits!

  3. Malak   21 years ago

    Mmmmmmmmmmmm . . . doughnut

  4. Andy   21 years ago

    I bet it’ll be nasty.

    LOL

  5. jean   21 years ago

    Rick Barton: carbs (good, bad or indifferent) eventually end up as glucose or equivalent, which is what insulin works on. Glucose is what fuels the brain. W/o some kind of carbs in the diet, no fuel for the brain…

  6. kmw   21 years ago
    • Comment by: thoreau at July 23, 2004 02:30 AM

    Cripes, thoreau… Do you ever sleep?

  7. speedwell   21 years ago

    Now, now… a milkshake is everything a donut is except the flour. Don’t believe me? Try adding two-thirds cup to two cups or so of self-rising flour and bake the result in muffin cups.

  8. Highway   21 years ago

    He blowed up REAL good!!!

  9. Mark   21 years ago

    Once again, the corprate class has come up with a way to exploit the masses. By aggressively advertising their addictive, high-sugar products, they are directly attacking the health of the nation.
    Where are the FDA and the FTC when you need them? Perhaps a pre-emptive lawsuit.

  10. TWC   21 years ago

    *chuckles*

    No matter how many times you guys use that ‘head explodes’ gag as a header it still makes me smile.

    Must be the visual….

  11. TWC   21 years ago

    It’s not just coincidence that Krispy Kreme is headquartered in WINSTON SALEM.

  12. Eric II   21 years ago

    “The Winston-Salem, N.C.-based company said it currently does not have plans to introduce low-carb versions of the new drinks.”

    Thank you.

  13. MrBungle   21 years ago

    Speedwell, that’s a great idea!!!

  14. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    It sounds kinda gross. BTW, there is a no human health requirement for carbs. Protein and fat, yes, but not carbs. Now, there are foods that contain carbs that are good for you…fruits and veg.

    Do you know what the one test result that people who are over a hundred y.o. have in common? Not low cholesterol. Low insulin! This correlates to lower blood sugar levels. Be healthy…Eat less carbs. And, eat many more antioxidants.
    Live long and prosper.

  15. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    I meant the drinkable donut, sounds kinda gross, not speedwell’s concoction.

  16. ol   21 years ago

    Anything that gets Banzhaf’s panties in a bunch is A-OK by me.

  17. Evan Williams   21 years ago

    Rick Barton:

    Read this article for a more complete look at your rather simplistic notion that “we don’t need carbs”. Carbs are fuel, the most efficient fuel source for the body. Fat, while more concentrated, is not as efficient. Also, there are good carbs, complex carbs, that come from natural, unrefined sources (whole wheat, oats, etc.) that are good sources of long-burning fuel (thus preventing extreme spikes and drops in the Glycemic Index), and which are also excellent sources of fiber (which is very necessary as well).

    “Eat less carbs” isn’t the best of statements. “Eat better carbs” would be a better way of putting it. Eat a sweet potato instead of white bread. Eat whole-wheat cereal instead of cap’n crunch. But the simplistic notion of Mr. Atkins’ “less carbs = good” is not something to live by, in the long term. Like I said, read the article I linked to above.

  18. Mo   21 years ago

    The only good thing about the War on Obesity is the blowback.

  19. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    Evan Williams,

    I stated the fact that carbs are not required for a healthful existence, but protein and fats are.

    Your link is contra the Atkins diet, which I’m not really into. It included the passage: a growing body of evidence is mounting that carbohydrate restriction can accelerate weight loss in the short term, but it has yet to be proven that it keeps the fat off in the long run. This is not too Damning.

    You wrote:
    thus preventing extreme spikes and drops in the Glycemic Index

    You’re a bit confused here. The glycemic index is a relative rating of how much different foods raise blood sugar levels. Oats have the lowest GI number of the whole grains and are a much better choice than wheat.

    If we cut out rice, potatoes, pasta and most breads, we will eat less carbs. I eat carbs only if they are BOTH not too high on the glycemic index and high in antioxidants. But, will take a higher GI for lots of antioxidants BTW, sweet potatoes meet my criteria. Most (but not all) veg and fruits do as well.

    Also, use lots of cinnamon. It makes cells more receptive to insulin so you produce less of it; also it is an antioxidant.

  20. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    Gratuitous New Wave link: It’s Missing Persons!

    http://www.cathedralstone.net/Pics/MissingPersons.jpg

    http://tinyurl.com/42j25

  21. Rick Barton   21 years ago

    jean,

    Fats and protein also wind up as glucose, do they not? Note; I’m not advocating abstaining from carbs. I’m just saying that we can survive with out them and that health tends to be optimized by eating less of them than most folks do.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Tariffs Are Breaking the Manufacturing Industries Trump Says He Wants To Protect

Eric Boehm | From the July 2025 issue

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!