Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Copyright Crackdown, Part XXXVII

Jesse Walker | 7.22.2004 9:47 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The INDUCE Act, a bipartisan bill sponsored by Sens. Leahy and Hatch, is a sweeping measure to punish people who "induce" copyright infringement as though they commited the infringement themselves. George Pieler explains just how bad an idea that is.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Do Bears Have Knuckles?

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (8)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Douglas Fletcher   21 years ago

    Somebody ought to tell this Leahy character to f*** off.

    Why is Orin Hatch always in on these supergoofy restrictive copyright bills?

  2. kwm   21 years ago

    I can?t help but think this bill is headed for sound defeat. The technology sector of business is larger than the copyright owners one. And it has much more lawyer money.

    Furthermore, it can be easily proven that any US law won?t stop the proliferation of P2P software. Move all downloading offshore, and you?ll make it even harder to stop.

    The entertainment industry should just do with P2P as they did with DART ? collect $5 per subscriber, to cover any incidental loss. I?m sure Kazaa can make enough legit money to pay $5 per person, and still make a profit.

    But again, over broad laws have a way of being shot down. (Usually.) At least over broad laws that will cost billions of dollars to a large trade group. I'm sure even Micro$soft would oppose this bill.

  3. kmw   21 years ago

    As writers Nir Boms & Erick Stakelbeck reported recently in National Review Online, ?Since 9/11, over a dozen privately owned, pro-democracy radio stations have emerged in freedom-starved countries like North Korea, Syria, Iran, and Cuba.? Will support for these efforts, which clearly may use copyrighted material, have to stop for fear of prosecution for inducement?

    Boms and Stakelbeck mean well, but it is the height of hubris to think that American laws apply to North Korea, Syria, Iran, Cuba or any other sovereign nation. And if US lawmakers think this will help fight worldwide piracy, perhaps someone should explain geography, and national borders.

  4. Shawn Smith   21 years ago

    Douglas Fletcher,

    Perhaps the Honorable Senator Hatch likes the $159,860 contributed to his campaign by the TV/Music/Movies industry. Also, because of the increase in lawsuits this legislation is likely to cause, the $451,751 given by lawyers and law firms doesn't hurt. Oh, and it's for the children.

  5. Chuck   21 years ago

    kmw--

    The way I read the article, I thought Pieler's point was that the legislation would allow any American contributors to or investors in these stations to be prosecuted as "inducers", not necessarily the stations themselves (see the preceding paragraph in the article). Clearly the stations aren't subject to U.S. law, but if they depend on support from Americans to keep going, as they may well do, this could be a problem.

  6. rst   21 years ago

    Come on Jesse, it's for the kids. And who knows better what's good for your kids than a bunch of glorified lawyers who can't even sufficiently fund education or do anything about juvenile recividism other than create wards of the state?

    The rhetoric is getting rather thin these days. Look through the smokescreen and there's our vaunted members of Congress, bent over for the RIAA while the MPAA gives the reacharound.

    Once there was a bill that read if Congress was decimated the state governors would pick our Senators. Fuck that, I say we have a party.

  7. Highway   21 years ago

    And again, Paul Sarbanes is in on some crummy legislation. Hooray for Maryland. *sigh*

  8. Volcanoes   21 years ago

    An interesting read! I'll consider what you said over my christmas holidays. I want Volcanoes for Christmas!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Florida Plans To Deputize 9 National Guardsmen as Immigration Judges To Increase Deportations

Autumn Billings | 7.2.2025 4:08 PM

The Tax Bill Rewards States for Higher Rates of Food Stamp Fraud

Eric Boehm | 7.2.2025 3:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!