Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password
Reason logo

Reason's Annual Webathon is underway! Donate today to see your name here.

Reason is supported by:
Justin Emsoff

Donate

Cheney Gets Served

Jesse Walker | 7.20.2004 5:03 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The New Yorker gives the first full account of the infamous Leahy-Cheney exchange on the Senate floor.

[Thanks to Bryan Alexander for the tip.]

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Any Sufficiently Advanced Technology ...

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Paul Z   21 years ago

    What a great piece! I'm laughing a certain lower posterior portion of my anatomy off!

  2. michael   21 years ago

    That's the funniest thing I've read all week. Cheers!

  3. jon   21 years ago

    Rumble in the Rotunda! The Asskick in the District! The Roundhouse in the Upper House! Oh screw it, I'm no Don King.

    Was it on Pay-Per-View or C-Span?

  4. Mo   21 years ago

    This explains why Don King signed up for the Bush campaign. On a side note, why has there been almost nothing said about Don "convicted for manslaughter" King working for the reelection campaign. Why the heck would the Bush camp sign him on? Seems sorta off.

  5. yonker   21 years ago

    If the New Yorker can write more pieces like that, I can stop reading The Onion. Their ad whoring has just gotten out of hand lately, and they aren't quite funny enough for me to forgive it.

  6. kmw   21 years ago

    Mr. Cheney . . . responded with a barnyard epithet, urging Mr. Leahy to perform an anatomical sexual impossibility

    I'm guessing the "impossibility" depends on your definition of "fuck."

    On that note, I'm going to back away from this discussion now... Slowly...

  7. R C Dean   21 years ago

    kmw - I suspect that the "impossibility" arises from the instruction to fuck "yourself." Although I once know someone who could lick the tip of their own nose, so depending on Leahy's degree of horsitude, I guess it could be possible.

  8. grylliade   21 years ago

    kmw - I suspect that the "impossibility" arises from the instruction to fuck "yourself." Although I once know someone who could lick the tip of their own nose, so depending on Leahy's degree of horsitude, I guess it could be possible.

    Pshaw. Everyone knows that debauched women prefer libertarians on account of the size of their parts, whereas the pure Democrat, man or beast, is below the average of Republicans. No honest Democrat would take his women-folk to the Libertarian Convention on account of the huge attractions and enormous temptations there and thereby offered to them.

  9. thoreau   21 years ago

    The political leanings of the anti-fun coalition lead me to conclude that the best parties will be hosted by couples in which the husband is a Democrat and the wife is a Republican.

  10. Shem   21 years ago

    Grylliade, I always sort of suspected that Republicans and Democrats would have been switched in that. After all, there has to be some reason the male contingent of the Anti-Fun crowd comes down so consistantly on the side of the GOP.

  11. Shem   21 years ago

    The female contingent of the anti-fun coaition comes down more or less equally on both sides of the aisle. Steinem to the left of them, Chenny to the right, into the jaws of death, rode the 600.

    Personally I'm inclined to agree with Thoreau.

  12. Shem   21 years ago

    That's Lynne Cheney, by the way. In case it wasn't totally obvious.

  13. R C Dean   21 years ago

    Shem, a better indicator of which side lacks, umm, gravitas, might be which side the female contingent of the Anti-Fun contingent sides with, doncha think?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Webathon 2025: Dec. 2 - Dec. 9 Thanks to 767 donors, we've reached $533,725 of our $400,000 $600,000 goal!

Reason Webathon 2023

Donate Now

Latest

Why I Support Reason with a Tax-Deductible Donation (and You Should Too!)

Nick Gillespie | 12.7.2025 8:00 AM

Trump Thinks a $100,000 Visa Fee Would Make Companies Hire More Americans. It Could Do the Opposite.

Fiona Harrigan | From the January 2026 issue

Virginia's New Blue Trifecta Puts Right-To-Work on the Line

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 12.6.2025 7:00 AM

Ayn Rand Denounced the FCC's 'Public Interest' Censorship More Than 60 Years Ago

Robby Soave | From the January 2026 issue

Review: Progressive Myths Rebuts the Left's Histrionic Takes

Jack Nicastro | From the January 2025 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

HELP EXPAND REASON’S JOURNALISM

Reason is an independent, audience-supported media organization. Your investment helps us reach millions of people every month.

Yes, I’ll invest in Reason’s growth! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREEDOM

Your donation supports the journalism that questions big-government promises and exposes failed ideas.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks