Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Cheney Gets Served

Jesse Walker | 7.20.2004 5:03 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

The New Yorker gives the first full account of the infamous Leahy-Cheney exchange on the Senate floor.

[Thanks to Bryan Alexander for the tip.]

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Any Sufficiently Advanced Technology ...

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Paul Z   21 years ago

    What a great piece! I’m laughing a certain lower posterior portion of my anatomy off!

  2. michael   21 years ago

    That’s the funniest thing I’ve read all week. Cheers!

  3. jon   21 years ago

    Rumble in the Rotunda! The Asskick in the District! The Roundhouse in the Upper House! Oh screw it, I’m no Don King.

    Was it on Pay-Per-View or C-Span?

  4. Mo   21 years ago

    This explains why Don King signed up for the Bush campaign. On a side note, why has there been almost nothing said about Don “convicted for manslaughter” King working for the reelection campaign. Why the heck would the Bush camp sign him on? Seems sorta off.

  5. yonker   21 years ago

    If the New Yorker can write more pieces like that, I can stop reading The Onion. Their ad whoring has just gotten out of hand lately, and they aren’t quite funny enough for me to forgive it.

  6. kmw   21 years ago

    Mr. Cheney . . . responded with a barnyard epithet, urging Mr. Leahy to perform an anatomical sexual impossibility

    I’m guessing the “impossibility” depends on your definition of “fuck.”

    On that note, I’m going to back away from this discussion now… Slowly…

  7. R C Dean   21 years ago

    kmw – I suspect that the “impossibility” arises from the instruction to fuck “yourself.” Although I once know someone who could lick the tip of their own nose, so depending on Leahy’s degree of horsitude, I guess it could be possible.

  8. grylliade   21 years ago

    kmw – I suspect that the “impossibility” arises from the instruction to fuck “yourself.” Although I once know someone who could lick the tip of their own nose, so depending on Leahy’s degree of horsitude, I guess it could be possible.

    Pshaw. Everyone knows that debauched women prefer libertarians on account of the size of their parts, whereas the pure Democrat, man or beast, is below the average of Republicans. No honest Democrat would take his women-folk to the Libertarian Convention on account of the huge attractions and enormous temptations there and thereby offered to them.

  9. thoreau   21 years ago

    The political leanings of the anti-fun coalition lead me to conclude that the best parties will be hosted by couples in which the husband is a Democrat and the wife is a Republican.

  10. Shem   21 years ago

    Grylliade, I always sort of suspected that Republicans and Democrats would have been switched in that. After all, there has to be some reason the male contingent of the Anti-Fun crowd comes down so consistantly on the side of the GOP.

  11. Shem   21 years ago

    The female contingent of the anti-fun coaition comes down more or less equally on both sides of the aisle. Steinem to the left of them, Chenny to the right, into the jaws of death, rode the 600.

    Personally I’m inclined to agree with Thoreau.

  12. Shem   21 years ago

    That’s Lynne Cheney, by the way. In case it wasn’t totally obvious.

  13. R C Dean   21 years ago

    Shem, a better indicator of which side lacks, umm, gravitas, might be which side the female contingent of the Anti-Fun contingent sides with, doncha think?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War

Matthew Petti | 6.6.2025 4:28 PM

Marsha Blackburn Wants Secret Police

C.J. Ciaramella | 6.6.2025 3:55 PM

This Small Business Is in Limbo As Owner Sues To Stop Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 6.6.2025 3:30 PM

A Runner Was Prosecuted for Unapproved Trail Use After the Referring Agency Called It 'Overcriminalization'

Jacob Sullum | 6.6.2025 2:50 PM

Police Blew Up This Innocent Woman's House and Left Her With the Bill. A Judge Says She's Owed $60,000.

Billy Binion | 6.6.2025 1:51 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!