"Get Out, You Damned"
Yet another novel by that Renaissance man, Saddam Hussein, is out. Entitled Get Out, You Damned (or "Begone! Oh Cursed One"), it's being serialized in the London-based Saudi newspaper, Asharq al-Awsat.
According to a CBC report, the novel "describes a Zionist-Christian conspiracy against Arabs and Muslims, with an Arab leading an army that invades the land of the enemy and topples one of their monumental towers, an apparent reference to the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York." The newspaper says it got its manuscript from Saddam's former physician.
This is the fourth work of fiction to be attributed to Saddam (the others didn't feature his name, but only a line informing readers that the work was by "its author"). In the old days, these works were wildly acclaimed by Iraqi critics. Saddam's 2002 masterpiece, The Impregnable Fortress, was praised for "its ability to weave a string of pearls on which love and war are strung together. And the way it celebrates the fundamental human qualities that refuse to allow war to be an interruption of the affairs of daily life bespeak[s] an author with a sensitive heart and mind."
Saddam isn't getting those kind of reviews anymore. Writes the CBC, "Egyptian novelist Youssef al-Qaeed described the works as "naive and superficial," adding that "They look like political leaflets."
Thanks to: ArtsJournal
More: Daniel Pipes, citing Saad Hadi, "a journalist who had a hand in the production of Saddam's novels," writes that "Saddam's favorite novelist was Ernest Hemingway, in particular The Old Man and the Sea, whose style he tried to emulate." Hadi says that Saddam would "sit in his state room and recount simple tales, while his aides recorded his words."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Hadi says that Saddam would 'sit in his state room and recount simple tales, while his aides recorded his words.'"
Was he sitting on the can, a la LBJ?
Neocon lies! Saddam didn't support 911. You neocon scum!
You know, gassing his own people was one thing, but churning out bad Hemmingway knock-offs? Maybe the war wasn't such a bad idea after all.
*Sigh* Has anyone ever claimed that Saddam wasn't pleased about the 9/11 attacks?
I see another John Cusack vehicle on the horizon, where a Baghdad literary agent is intrigued by the "rage" in the unfocused writing of a younger Saddam, while toddlers Uday and Qusay are torturing small animals and lighting things on fire out in the courtyard.